Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Russia v Ukraine


Bjornebye
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

If we had announcements of US, Canada, EU leaders talking about how they're trying to work on negotiations as much as they've gone on about sanctions and shipping in weapons in recent days maybe we would've got further towards resolving this.

I am gonna break it to you gently - we aren't doing anything.

And as difficult as that is to accept there is absolutely zero chance that Putin gives two fucks about what media is reporting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Because he's going on about putting nuclear forces on high alert and we're not stopping to see if all of the sanctions we've already put in place are having any effect. There's constantly more and more every single day.

 

And this isn't even bringing into it the tons of weapons we're openly talking about shipping in, again with new announcements every single day. I don't think it's helping calm the situation down.

 

If we had announcements of US, Canada, EU leaders talking about how they're trying to work on negotiations as much as they've gone on about sanctions and shipping in weapons in recent days maybe we would've got further towards resolving this.

Jesus, are you seeing the same things everyone else is? Russia were never going to be mollified by anything but putting Ukraine under its jackboot. Why else park half it's army on it's borders and say 'nothing to see here, just parking my tanks...'? 

 

This cunt needs dealing with and this excuse for a state he's head of needs putting into line. Russia is still 40 years behind the West in almost every regard thanks to this regime. Apart from natural resources, Russia offers literally nothing the world wants as it cannot understand world markets or what they demand. The only states it can meaningfully engage with are similar backward quasi-feudal juntas that kowtow to Moscow and sucks Putin's cock. You can't level with these kinds of people because their deep-rooted inferiority complex causes them to over flex what little 'might' they have. This invasion being a classic case in point. 

 

These sanctions will see a developmental apartheid putting Russia even further behind the rest of the developed world. As there is no apparatus within that country to stop the current regime, it will continue along an isolationist path and the rest of the world will have to continue to deal with it. Without meaningful change from within Russia, t's not looking good medium-long term at all. and sadly it'll be the Russian people who suffer most. As always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I'm saying is that I'd prefer some more focus on negotiations, no matter how much people think they won't work. Sometimes for the sake of saving lives, both sides can concede one or more things (I'm not saying it has to be Ukraine being neutral) to reach peace. That's all I want. After days of Russian forces taking the damage they have done maybe they'll be more likely to try and find a way out of this that ends the fighting.

 

I'm not even suggesting anything strange, just that both sides try to negotiate more. There's supposed to be talks on the Belarus border shortly, if they don't work out hopefully they can try again soon to see if anything changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

All I'm saying is that I'd prefer some more focus on negotiations, no matter how much people think they won't work. Sometimes for the sake of saving lives, both sides can concede one or more things (I'm not saying it has to be Ukraine being neutral) to reach peace. That's all I want. After days of Russian forces taking the damage they have done maybe they'll be more likely to try and find a way out of this that ends the fighting.

 

I'm not even suggesting anything strange, just that both sides try to negotiate more. There's supposed to be talks on the Belarus border shortly, if they don't work out hopefully they can try again soon to see if anything changes.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

All I'm saying is that I'd prefer some more focus on negotiations, no matter how much people think they won't work. Sometimes for the sake of saving lives, both sides can concede one or more things (I'm not saying it has to be Ukraine being neutral) to reach peace. That's all I want. After days of Russian forces taking the damage they have done maybe they'll be more likely to try and find a way out of this that ends the fighting.

 

I'm not even suggesting anything strange, just that both sides try to negotiate more. There's supposed to be talks on the Belarus border shortly, if they don't work out hopefully they can try again soon to see if anything changes.

"More focus on negotiations."

 

I mean, honestly. What does that even mean?

 

If someone breaks into your house and starts kicking your dog, you don't wring your hands and try to convince him it's a bad idea! You call the coppers and start physically fighting him to get him to stop!

 

Once he's in handcuffs or unconscious on your floor, THEN you can start figuring out what happened, why, and how you can work to prevent it next time. Right now, though, it's time to stop the violence that's occurring, and the only way to do that is to convince the one fomenting the violence that he can't succeed.

 

Can you at least admit that Russia is at fault here? That their unprovoked attack was completely and totally unjustified and that they, or at least their political leadership, must be held to account for what they've done? Or are you going to do some sort of whataboutism and "try to see it from their point of view?"

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ne Moe Imya said:

"More focus on negotiations."

 

I mean, honestly. What does that even mean?

 

If someone breaks into your house and starts kicking your dog, you don't wring your hands and try to convince him it's a bad idea! You call the coppers and start physically fighting him to get him to stop!

 

Once he's in handcuffs or unconscious on your floor, THEN you can start figuring out what happened, why, and how you can work to prevent it next time. Right now, though, it's time to stop the violence that's occurring, and the only way to do that is to convince the one fomenting the violence that he can't succeed.

 

Can you at least admit that Russia is at fault here? That their unprovoked attack was completely and totally unjustified and that they, or at least their political leadership, must be held to account for what they've done? Or are you going to do some sort of whataboutism and "try to see it from their point of view?"

That sounds really sensible. Pity this doesn't seem to apply to the Palestinian occupation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Ne Moe Imya said:

"More focus on negotiations."

 

I mean, honestly. What does that even mean?

 

If someone breaks into your house and starts kicking your dog, you don't wring your hands and try to convince him it's a bad idea! You call the coppers and start physically fighting him to get him to stop!

 

Once he's in handcuffs or unconscious on your floor, THEN you can start figuring out what happened, why, and how you can work to prevent it next time. Right now, though, it's time to stop the violence that's occurring, and the only way to do that is to convince the one fomenting the violence that he can't succeed.

 

Can you at least admit that Russia is at fault here? That their unprovoked attack was completely and totally unjustified and that they, or at least their political leadership, must be held to account for what they've done? Or are you going to do some sort of whataboutism and "try to see it from their point of view?"

 

If trying to have talks to stop this so that lives are saved is so useless then Ukraine and Russia wouldn't have talks taking place shortly, it should always be worth trying if it has a chance of working. And of course Russia are at fault here, they invaded Ukraine.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sugar Ape said:

Loooong thread but some of it is interesting though I did nearly fall asleep by the end of it. 
 

 

Excellent points made, and it worries me. Putin could be unhinged enough to do mad shit because he looks so fucking stupid thinking he could just walk into the Ukraine and take what he wanted. 
 

Clearly the Ukraine is a very different beast to 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

All I'm saying is that I'd prefer some more focus on negotiations, no matter how much people think they won't work. Sometimes for the sake of saving lives, both sides can concede one or more things (I'm not saying it has to be Ukraine being neutral) to reach peace. That's all I want. After days of Russian forces taking the damage they have done maybe they'll be more likely to try and find a way out of this that ends the fighting.

 

I'm not even suggesting anything strange, just that both sides try to negotiate more. There's supposed to be talks on the Belarus border shortly, if they don't work out hopefully they can try again soon to see if anything changes.

The West has had 67 years to do the right thing with negotiations.

 

Let’s give history a ‘nod’ ey? More proper and open all encompassing communication between the leading powers of the day, may have created a very different world, leaving no room for the likes of Putin to come to power. There are similarities to the rise of Hitler.
 

The paranoia of Putin, and possibly the Russian people to a point, is based on a long history. In 1955, just 10 yrs after the end of WW2, NATO invited the X Nazi regime, Germany into the NATO fold. Twenty seven million Russians died in that global conflict - and some would argue that had the Russians failed to hold Stalingrad, the war could have been even more devastating. To then see a new NATO inclusive of Germany just a decade later, I think, would have had a profound effect on the Soviet leadership and probably its people. It was a kick in the teeth.

 

Then you had a situation post 1991 (capitalist takeover of the communist regime) where the average lifespan of the soviet people dropped by 6 years in just 6 six years between 1991-97. Total Social and economic disintegration, while the West looked on.

 

Enter Putin.


The analogy here is the reparations inflicted on Germany in 1918, sowing the seeds of the rise of Hitler. I’d argue that the post WW2 history including the end of the USSR and Yeltsin’s (some would say illegal) manipulation, sowed the seeds of the despot Putin.

There has been zero real negotiation between the two Empires since the fall of Berlin in 1945. Churchill wanted to go after the soviets immediately. The paranoia of both sides has been palpable for much of the 20th century and it hasn’t diminished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rouble all-time-low. Russian cenbank raises interest rate from 9.5% to 20% - little effect so far. $600 bn in foreign exchange reserves & declining (suggestion that $10 bn was taken by end of last week by general public) - US/EU actively trying to seize these reserves. Invasion estimated to be costing Rus $15 bn a day. Do the maths on how long this madness can go on for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Alex_K said:

Rouble all-time-low. Russian cenbank raises interest rate from 9.5% to 20% - little effect so far. $600 bn in foreign exchange reserves & declining (suggestion that $10 bn was taken by end of last week by general public) - US/EU actively trying to seize these reserves. Invasion estimated to be costing Rus $15 bn a day. Do the maths on how long this madness can go on for.

Those mad cunts would just print more money and say fuck all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Because he's going on about putting nuclear forces on high alert and we're not stopping to see if all of the sanctions we've already put in place are having any effect. There's constantly more and more every single day.

 

And this isn't even bringing into it the tons of weapons we're openly talking about shipping in, again with new announcements every single day. I don't think it's helping calm the situation down.

 

If we had announcements of US, Canada, EU leaders talking about how they're trying to work on negotiations as much as they've gone on about sanctions and shipping in weapons in recent days maybe we would've got further towards resolving this.

I’m sure conversations are happening, but when you’ve got one coked up lad shouting the odds all over your mates chip shop, trashing the place, handing your mate a hammer through the door to shut the fucker up seems a reasonable thing to do

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chrisbonnie said:

Those mad cunts would just print more money and say fuck all. 

Presumeably the central bank hiking interest rates will have a knock on effect with mortgages. If that is the case, a lot of russians are going to suddenly question their support for Putin's war.

 

In fact, it started at the weekend. It'll get even higher this week.

 

https://www.reuters.com/business/russias-vtb-hike-mortgage-rates-by-four-percentage-points-153-2022-02-27/

 

Quote

MOSCOW, Feb 27 (Reuters) - Russia's No. 2 lender VTB (VTBR.MM) will hike mortgage rates by four percentgae points to 15.3% from Feb. 28, it said on Sunday, with harsh new Western sanctions forcing the bank to reconsider its mortgage lending parameters.

"Due to the sharp rise in interest rates on the market we are also temporarily suspending the processing of refinancing" operations, VTB said in a statement.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, M_B said:

Presumeably the central bank hiking interest rates will have a knock on effect with mortgages. If that is the case, a lot of russians are going to suddenly question their support for Putin's war.

 

In fact, it started at the weekend. It'll get even higher this week.

 

https://www.reuters.com/business/russias-vtb-hike-mortgage-rates-by-four-percentage-points-153-2022-02-27/

 

 

Now this is the sort of value-add conversation points that are good to see in this thread. Yes, precipitous times for Rus asset owners. Don't see how there is any way back here while Putin remains in charge: only going to get worse without serious reconciliation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FB source (Tom Cooper) summary as per everyday now, split it in two so it is easier to read.

 

Part 1

 

Good morning everybody!

Today, 5th day of the war in Ukraine, I’ll continue the coverage of events over the last 24 hours, and answer a few questions, too. There’s too much activity on the diplomatic/international plan: the mass of that is useless babbling. Sufficient to say that the West – plus Japan and South Korea – have imposed massive sanctions upon Russia, blocking de-facto all the trade, all the Russian assets abroad, and all the cooperation in a mass of other fields (space, sports etc.). Let me concentrate on military developments instead.

 

STRATEGIC LEVEL

Putin has put his nuclear forces on ‘special alert’, as ‘deterrence’ against ‘aggressive statements by the NATO’. There was no reply from the USA and/or NATO – and that’s good that way. Better to avoid engaging in a spiral of escalation with a bully.

 

AIR

The EU – repeat for emphasis: the EU – is intending to donate old MiG-29s and Su-25s of different NATO-air forces to Ukraine. Sounds logical: Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria etc. are still flying MiG-29s, for example. Ukrainians can fly such jets, even if their communications and IFF have been significantly modified over the time. Still, I consider this for useless political decision in style of, ‘we must do something’. It’s going to make Ukrainians happy, no doubt, but, jets in question are 40 years old and ‘bent’ from all the training over the years, and some of installed equipment (especially IFF and radios) is not going to be ‘compatible’ with the Ukrainians. On top of that, it’s near pointless, because of the massive Russian superiority, and hiding fighter jets is anything else than easy. Thus, I’m curious to see if and how anything of this kind might be realised.

 

‘Hiding fighter jets’ brings me to a question several have asked yesterday. That is: how does the Ukrainian Air Force operate? In the night prior to the Russian aggression, it dispersed its aircraft and helicopters on airfields in the west and south of the country. A few are at ‘official’ air bases, but the mass is at minor airfields. Even then, Ukrainians are keeping them 1000-4000 metres away from any runways, well-concealed. Thus, except for destroying many of old, ‘stored’ – actually: abandoned – jets left behind, the Russians hit less than a handful of Ukrainian combat aircraft and helicopters on the ground.

 

For the Russians,´finding these jets is anything else than easy. Because Ukrainian S-300s are still operational, the Russians can’t freely move their handful of precious Tu-214R reconnaissance jets equipped with SLARs. They can’t bring them closely enough to find Ukrainian jets on the ground. Thus, they have to wait for Ukrainians to fly.

Now, MiG-29 and Su-25 were built for operations from ‘primitive’ facilities, can use even grass runways. That far, no problem. Where there is a massive problem is the command and control of such a ‘force’: what jet is where, which one to scramble in what case, and, hand on heart, one can’t just scramble a jet and send it ‘to attack whatever enemy it finds’, nowadays. Jets are moving very fast. What’s ‘here’ one moment, is ‘there’ the next, and thus easier to completely miss than to find. Moreover, the Russians are ‘hiding’ their aircraft with massive volumes of electronic warfare, and thus any Ukrainian jets that are airborne but do not have very specific targeting information, only serve as targets for the enemy. Especially, MiG-29 needs good support from the ground control to operate effectively: it needs ground control to tell the pilot where is the target and what is it doing. Unsurprisingly, Ukrainians have already lost a number of MiG-29s – to Russian interceptors, to surface-to-air missiles and other Russian weapons.

By now, Ukrainian Air Force can operate only in the west and the south, where the Russian air defence- and electronic warfare assets have not yet been deployed, are too far away, or are yet in the process of development. This is why we only see videos of Ukrainian Su-25s attacking advancing columns of the Russian Army, and then, primarily, in the south, where the battlefield is ‘still fluid’. When doing so, they are facing a full range of air defence means, from AKM assault rifles to S-400s (ASCC/NATO-codename ‘SS-21 Growler’). Unsurprisingly, they’re flying very low, to limit detection and exposure – and still suffering heavy losses: at least 3 Ukrainian Su-25s were shot down yesterday and this morning. Apparently, all their pilots were killed.

 

Why such losses? Fast- and low-flying jets operating in the skies ‘saturated’ by enemy aircraft and air defences are ‘perfect targets’ for own air defences, too – as there is no way for ground troops well-supplied with MANPADs to say which is Russian and which is Ukrainian, while Russian aircraft are better-protected by countermeasures. Unsurprisingly, at least one of three Ukrainian Su-25s lost yesterday and today was shot down by own troops.

Generally, when you see a video shown a jet over Ukraine these days, you can gauge the following: if flying low, it’s Ukrainian. Only Russian Su-25s are flying low: all others are operating at medium and high altitudes.

Operations-wise, the Keystone Cops in Moscow claim the destruction of over 1,150 military targets in Ukraine, and have, for the first time ever, admitted suffering casualties – but without providing any kind of figures. They also declared ‘total aerial superiority’ in the skies, indicating there must be a reason why they’re as happy (probably shot down some Ukrainian MiG-29s and/or Su-27s).

The whole afternoon, Russian forces deployed in Belarus continued firing 9K720 Iskander (ASCC/NAtO-codename ‘SS-26 Stone’) tactical ballistic missiles at Ukraine. One, after the other.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part Two

 

NORTH
Despite announcements of ‘massive aerial onslaught’ and reports about ‘Russian attacks on Kyiv’, the area around the Ukrainian capitol is relatively quiet. Actually, the Russians are trying to push a mass of their mechanised units down the corridor along the Dnepr River, an they are widening that corridor towards the west. So much so, roads north of Kyiv are choke-full of Russian military vehicles (see attached sat-photos taken by Maxar). The same is valid for north-eastern approaches to Kyiv.
 
EAST
The Russians are both pushing their forward units in between Chernhiv and Kharkiv (both of which are meanwhile encircled), and rushing (or at least towing) additional units into this gap. Russian Army units deployed in this area are suffering the worst losses so far, definitely have very poor morale, and a bare minimum of supplies. That’s why I say ‘towing’: many of involved combat vehicles are broken or out of fuel. Many are abandoned by their crews for mechanical breakdowns; others because their crews are shocked by Ukrainian resistance. This is why the Russian advance on Kyiv from this direction is now lagging days behind the schedule.
That said, yesterday morning (27 Feb 22), there was another ‘thunder run’ by a Russian mechanised forces – this time into downtown Kharkiv. Stretched along major roads in between densely built neighbourhoods, this was hit by defenders, suffered losses and was forces to retreat. The city remains under Ukrainian control.
West of Kharkiv, the Russians reached Okhtyrka, but were repulsed when trying to enter the town. They then turned around and continued in direction of Poltava.
This is all classic Soviet/Russian tactics: advance on urban centres, check if they’re protected, and if not, by-pass them.
Sumy is still under Ukrainian control, but surrounded by the Russians from three sides, while the mayor of Kupianks simply handed out the town to the Russians.
In Severodonetsk (population about 110,000), the last night, somebody hit the giant Azot fertiliser plant (owned by an Ukrainian oligarch, but financed by the Russians), causing a detonation comparable to the Beirut blast. Right now, I’ve got no further details.
Further east: any reports about the Russians making no territorial gains in Donbas are nonsense. Ukrainians are holding out on most of the LOC, but withdrew from Shchastya to Sievierodonetsk (about 20km), and have lost Donske. Thus, their frontline was breached. Ukrainian officials have announced the recapture of Volnovakha, yesterday evening, but I have my doubts about this.
Mariupol is now surrounded from the west and the east and there are first reports about the Russians running probing attacks.
 
SOUTH
This area remains a ‘mechanised-force-commander’s paradise’ – for the Russians are continuing their rapid advances over the flat, frozen steppe in northern and eastern direction, there are lots of ‘meeting engagements’, air- and artillery-strikes, there is a major bridgehead with Russians trying to punch over Dnepr towards West, and at least on that side, the Ukrainians are counterattacking with everything at their disposal.
The Russians have completed the occupation of the southern bank of Dnepr from the Black Sea up to around Zaporozhye. Their troops are not yet inside Zaporozhye, though. The reason is the Russian bridgehead at Nova Kakhovka, from where they’re trying to assault Mykolaiv, while hit by Ukrainians from both flanks. Ukrainians are defending Kherson and Mykolaiv, and bringing in additional forces from the north. Their Su-25s and TB.2s remain highly active over this battlefield.
On the north-eastern side: the Russians are pushing on Zaporozhye, have reached Tokmak (not sure if they’ve taken it), and are attacking on Mariupol.
 
CONCLUSION
The classic Soviet/Russian military doctrine envisages campaigns of this kind to be run so that the Russian forces first ‘tie’ the enemy by numerous attacks on a wide frontline. Then, once the enemy has committed its reserves, and/or its strategic reserve is localised, the Russians are to deploy their major force (‘operational group’) for the main blow. This is how the theory goes ever since back in 1944.
….and is one reason why Gerasimov is only now rushing his ‘best’ units into Ukraine.
Other are as follows:
Strategists like him are always keeping about a third of their force in reserve. After all, and even if the NATO would never attack into Belarus, he can’t ignore the deployment of NATO forces in the Baltic states and Poland. He knows he couldn’t face such a threat with ‘B-class’ units, like the mass of those already involved in Ukraine. That’s why ‘A-class’ – ‘crack’, ‘elite’, ‘best-trained/equipped’ units are still kept back, whether deployed in Belarus or in western Russian Federation.
The main penetration into Ukraine took place in the ‘wrong’ part of the country: the south. It’s complex and taking time to get heavy, mechanised units to Crimea and then drive them all the way to the frontlines.
…which is why I have my doubts about Western reports along which the Russians have already deployed ‘three quarters’ of their available forces. They might have the intention to, eventually, do so, but about 50% of their troops available for this operation, are still not on the frontline.
Finally, one observation regarding official Ukrainian claims: as much as those released by the Keystone Cops are little more than a laugh, the longer this war goes on, the more are the Ukrainian releases about military developments reminding me about Armenian claims from the Second Nagorny Karabakh War of 2020. They simply can't be trusted.
Ah yes and: can one expect from the Russians to try linking-up with Russian-occupied Transnistria in Moldova? Yes, 1000% sure. This is definitely one of Putin's war aims. This is why his forces are pushing so hard on Mykolaiv: in order to reach Odessa (up to 80% of the population are Russians), and then Transnistria.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst almost everyman and his dog in world applauds the Ukraine people's bravery in face of the might of the red army, public schoolboy and British journo Tom Harwood thinks they've been a bit soft, he then goes on to give the Ukraine people some combat advice.

 

 

It's hard to tell what's a parody account or not on twitter these days but I've checked and Harwoods is real.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...