whiskey nose

[shouter]

Now call me paranoid, but is there some real dirty tricks involving him and the Suarez case? I can't shake my thoughts on this and it goes back to the scandalous post match interview he gave after our game with them. Now to me the timing of this interview is key. Did he conduct this interview after knowing that Evra had made the allegation against Suarez. Because to me that interview was a scandalous attempt to plant a seed into the minds of referees and opposing fans alike that Suarez is a diver and a cheat. Now I don't know or rather I do know how he got away with that statement because in my mind it worked.

 

Since then Suarez has hardly had a decision go for him and opposing fans have given him even more stick than he was getting previously. Now we get to the FA. We now know that one of the panel was Dennis smith who is a close personal friend of Ferguson and was even credited with saving his job. Conflict of interest dosent even come close. Not to mention the chief exc of mufc working for the FA and you just can't say that any decision made by that panel was any way impartial. It even makes you wonder who was realy driving all this in the end,what with the fa being determined to hit back at blatter and fergusons drive to hurt us and esp our star player than you realy have to say the whole thing stinks to high heaven.

 

I think lfc know what is going on to which is why we are not taking this lying down and seem to want to fight this all the way. Anyway just wanted to get a few things of my chest.

[Jack the Sipper]

I've just posted in the Mirror thread a page from the Mirror's '25th anniversary interview' with the cunt, published in the days following Evra's initial claim against Suarez. The topic on which Fergie chooses to talk about? How racism is back and is ruining our game. As you'll see in the thread, the headline is next to a picture of Suarez - who hadn't even been charged at that point.

 

Does anyone believe that the cunt's decision to argue that racism is back and ruining our game was based on anything other than the fact that a Liverpool player had been accused of making a racist remark to a Man U player?

[shouter]

I've just posted in the Mirror thread a page from the Mirror's '25th anniversary interview' with the cunt, published in the days following Evra's initial claim against Suarez. The topic on which Fergie chooses to talk about? How racism is back and is ruining our game. As you'll see in the thread, the headline is next to a picture of Suarez - who hadn't even been charged at that point.

 

Does anyone believe that the cunt's decision to argue that racism is back and ruining our game was based on anything other than the fact that a Liverpool player had been accused of making a racist remark to a Man U player?

 

Yeah I'd forgotten about that. He's defo behind some of this. Got all the press like maddock holt etc licking his balls. Love to see mobile phone records of his and Dennis smith in the last couple of weeks.

[RedPaul]

You're not paranoid, I fully believe he is behind what is a concerted campaign, but it will never be proven, and anyone who suggests it will just be called a crazy fool who believes in conspiracy theories.

[Elite]

He's such an horrible fucker.

 

Control freak who the media are scared of.

[Lurtz]

Can anyone explain to me why the club didn't action its right to veto the panel?

[Barzini]

Can anyone explain to me why the club didn't action its right to veto the panel?

 

The only reason I can think of is we thought we had a watertight case with no chance of being found guilty. In that instance, asking for a change to the panel would look as though we maybe we were worried about the outcome and therefore indicating a possible case to answer.

 

Fuck knows, just speculation on my part but we've possibly misjudged the situation horribly here and should have been a lot more wary about the outcome.

[RedPaul]

Can anyone explain to me why the club didn't action its right to veto the panel?

 

We naively thought Luis would get a fair hearing? We didn't want to rock the fa's boat? Fuck knows, but it's come back to bite us.

[Jim MM]

Can anyone explain to me why the club didn't action its right to veto the panel?

 

Maybe they didn't know. I didn't until last week and I doubt the FA would have sent the club a resumé outlining the panel's previous associations. Maybe LFC should have dug a bit deeper.

[Manny]

I've just posted in the Mirror thread a page from the Mirror's '25th anniversary interview' with the cunt, published in the days following Evra's initial claim against Suarez. The topic on which Fergie chooses to talk about? How racism is back and is ruining our game. As you'll see in the thread, the headline is next to a picture of Suarez - who hadn't even been charged at that point.

 

Does anyone believe that the cunt's decision to argue that racism is back and ruining our game was based on anything other than the fact that a Liverpool player had been accused of making a racist remark to a Man U player?

 

Reminds me of when the "Respect" campaign reached its zenith, and he started chirping on about the importance of respect to officials, and how he always instructed his players to offer nothing but the utmost consideration towards them, and they never hassled officials, before the game with us. 30 minutes in? One of our players is dismissed from the game.

 

He sets the narrative and the FA/Media follow. He's a shitty-kecked, horrible, drunken old cunt.

[navbasi]

You're not paranoid, I fully believe he is behind what is a concerted campaign, but it will never be proven, and anyone who suggests it will just be called a crazy fool who believes in conspiracy theories.

 

As Rafa once stated. "You cannot have an impartial Football Association when members of that board are also executives at Manchester Utd football club"

[piscinin]

We naively thought Luis would get a fair hearing? We didn't want to rock the fa's boat? Fuck knows, but it's come back to bite us.

 

Or we knew, given the way the charge was worded that technically Suarez was guilty and so the FA would find him guilty regardless.

 

The only way Suarez was going to get off, is the same way the tramp always gets off, by the charge not being made in the first place. As in the case of Evra calling Luis a "South American". Just as guilty, but no charge.

 

How to this day nothing has been done about the fact that he exercised control over a 3rd party i.e. Stoke in getting them to recall their players from preston is all the proof you need that the system is not fit for purpose.

[shouter]

In my opinion.no one who works at the FA should have an active role at a premier league club. Rafa was bang on about gill but he got laughed at because between the FA and half the club managers being In the tramps back pocket he made sure Rafa was made to look like he was Loosing it, but he was 100% right.

[TheDrowningMan]

The Fake Socialist will be dead soon, let him have his last hurrah. He knows that it's more or less impossible that another elite trophy will be entering the cabinet under his watch, so he has to get his kicks in another ways.

[shouter]

The Fake Socialist will be dead soon, let him have his last hurrah. He knows that it's more or less impossible that another elite trophy will be entering the cabinet under his watch, so he has to get his kicks in another ways.

 

Ha ha, the fake socialist. I like that.

[satmann]

The silent from united says it all, they would have responded. Looks like fergie told the media last night not to print anything. Hes definitely behind this .

[BRAP]

That twat knew straight away we had a special player on our hands, he would of been for us what Cantona was to them, and he knew it, thats why he destroyed his reputation as a diver and a Racist, I hope some day we will be able to have the last laugh however I think he will be off to the big wine shop in the sky sooner than we think

[FieldingMellish]

 

“As I was sayin to Patrice...jus call him a South American...the FA are too thick to realize that as racist...they jus see things in black 'n' white...we'll get him...heheheh”

[Jairzinho]

Can't be too long now.

[WaltonRed]

I think The King knows who's behind it hence backing Luis all the way

[Guest San Don]

Those bastards down the east lancs are up to something. They've kept very quiet since the 'judgement' was released.

 

I dont recall a press release from them that their player had been 'vindicated.' Zilch, nada schtum. Nothing at all. They are up to something and we need to keep an eye on them bastards.

[Gym Beglin]

Why would he? We're not that big a threat.

I want to believe, but I just can't.

[Newport]

This smear campaign is a sign of acknowledgement. He always does that to someone who's a threat to them.

[WaltonRed]

He'll die thinking of us, which in a way will be victory enough.

[Iceman]

To paraphrase ... "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled, was making people think he doesn't exist."

 

It's so obvious slur is pulling strings. The puppetmaster. Cunt.