Barrington Womble

hahaha. i haven't wound my neck in about scott, i just put him on ignore because he's a bellend. to be clear FSG are absolute and utter cunts. i hope this helps.

This link gives the premier league top 60, we don't have one in the top 10. I dunno what city have done, but a few years back I saw a similar one of these where they had I think 8 players earning more than any Liverpool player and 12 more than everyone more than our top 3 (which was just after we gave mo, mane and firmino pay rises). It would seem they've given them pay cuts! Fucking chilwell 190k! This list also has thiago Silva on 110k, which is substantially less than the other, but maybe the 1st one is a year old when he was still on PSG cash. https://amp-thenationalnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.thenationalnews.com/sport/football/the-60-highest-paid-premier-league-players-1.1156323?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_ct=1624395330152&amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=16243952883997&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thenationalnews.com%2Fsport%2Ffootball%2Fthe-60-highest-paid-premier-league-players-1.1156323

De Ligt is the stand out one, the rest less mental (well maybe Siva too is fucking mental). It's easy to see why Juve are fucking skint, with that, Ronaldo and fuck knows who else.

He was 7th in defenders. Reported in quite a few places, although they could be copying each other. 1. Matthijs de Ligt - £416,000-a-week 2. Thiago Silva - £300,000-a-week 3. Lucas Hernandez - £250,000-a-week 4. Gerard Pique - £220,000-a-week 5. Marquinhos - £216,000-week 6. Samuel Umtiti - £210,000-a-week 7. Virgil van Dijk - £200,000-a-week 8. Sergio Ramos - £200,000-a-week 9. Marcelo - £200,000-a-week 10. Harry Maguire - £190,000-a-week

And I'm assuming plus isn't good?

According to a few reports online he's the 7th highest in the world on 200k per week. But I'm pretty sure he doesn't earn that much - there were loads of reports he was going to sign a 2nd contract, but I'm not sure he ever did.

They're talking like Rafa going there is a done deal, have I missed something?

Don't think I've ever clicked through to sports witness before. Fuck me, some real eye AIDS on there. I must have had to swipe away about half a dozen adverts just to read the one line that was in the tweet!

I don't let her dictate, hence why she moans. As I say, the it's the same with you "don't post speculation on the speculation thread because I don't like it, they're all rags". On the fucking rag more like it.

The City might be a law unto itself, but it shouldn't alter UNESCO's decision making. It's almost like money has talked and UNESCO are happy London is a.living breathing city whereas on our side we're supposed to live in a museum.

we've had that other fucking corrupt imbecile running the city for years UNESCO have been pissed off for ages. The city should have worked with UNESCO years ago to make this palatable. Spot on. Look at the sky line behind the houses of parliament - that London eye monstrosity, but it appears that's alright. High rise after high rise going up in the city and london bridge areas as a backdrop to the Tower of London and Tower Bridge. I think they've done a decent job with some of the high rises in the City, they are unusual and interesting. But there's absolutely no doubt they're at odds with the Tower of London. Yet this stadium is about 2 fucking miles from the 3 graces in an area that is a complete fucking dump. nobody seemed arsed when we built a fucking carpark and the Malmaison between the liver building and waterloo warehouse. in fact those shit apartments on the waterloo dock site blocking the view of the warehouse. yet all of a sudden there's a stadium about 2 miles away in waste land, which on the face of it looks to be a good design and good quality, yet all of a sudden it's an issue? It's fucking nonsense and screams of the right palms not being crossed or something else at play.

Maybe you should read your own posts. You sound like my bird when I have stayed in the pub too long. Lots of people are likely to only post stuff that supports their point of view. As I posted earlier, some will do that. Some will post all they see. Some will post just when it's fantasy stuff because they'd sooner live in a fantasy world than a real one. I don't really know why people would expect much different.

I can't see how Everton's ground impacts anything. Those docks will never be used as docks again. It's a fucking shit hole. As long as the design is relatively sympathetic to the surrounding area (and I think the bloos have done a decent job), I can't see what the issue is.

Here's a message for you as you clearly seem to be fuming. This thread will be full of lots of speculation. Some of it will say "there'll be no more players coming in". Some will link us with mbappe, haaland and kane. Some people may post things that are more attuned with their expectations of the summer. Some people will only post wild mental speculation that seems fun to imagine to them. Some people will post just anything they trip upon, this is where you put speculation. But if they're all rags in your opinion, you may find your blood pressure will have a greater level of normality if you stay clear of this thread. Because of course I expect you to be as angry at the next mbappe story in a "rag".

It's just a story. I put loads from the echo on here, including the shite they say like "real Madrid open the door to LFC move for mbappe". It's a fucking transfer speculation thread, which is why it's thousands of posts long and not just 3 posts saying "spiffing, the paper of record has declared Konate is now an LFC player, but it's behind a paywall". It seems to me your issue is because the echo are saying something potentially negative, hence your "rag" comment, which I would prefer was saved for one specific paper.