Barrington Womble

Exactly. And I find it quite astonishing that some on here think a thread titled "go fuck yourselves fsg" expects the types of posts in here not to be negative about them but rather fsg you don't need to fuck yourself, my mouth is wide open for a big gobble.

No.

I like it though, don't you?

Can't wait for all the FSW out shouts from GoT

Does anyone really believe we're after those players? I don't see anyone suggesting sell Salah to buy these guys. I see them suggesting sell Salah to buy the random players like Sarr and bassouma we're always linked with, with the idea we might get a 2 or 3 for 1. The only ones who mention the likes of mbappe are the fsg flag waving dickheads who go "we're keeping our powder dry for a big one next summer"

Mersey region authority? Is that effectively the metro mayor's office? 1.3bn boost to economy, on a 350m build of which 45m comes out of the local economy? And a large portion will be steel, no doubt delivered from uncle uzzie steel co. They must include every penny they take in match day revenue over what they take today for decades.

Hahaha, is he still banging on about protests? Just about every time I see someone quote him, this is the only thing he talks about. You could almost believe he was the one pushing it, just so he could dig people out. On the city thread, someone has posted an article from medium which talks about city and ultimately their fans identity fussion. This fucking melt illustrates our version of that perfectly.

There's nothing to argue with there at all. Which is why sovereign money shouldn't be allowed into the game. The game itself (by that I mean the governing bodies) are defenceless against them. It's not just on the pitch they become unstoppable, they break and fracture the institutions off it. While I don't think think abramovic was good for the game, at least the sporting project appeared to be a motivator and his sportswashing element was just to perhaps legitimise himself. We're stuck with all this now and I don't really see how we ever rid the game of it.

There's 2 different target audiences though aren't there. The domestic one. The international one. The domestic one, as we have seen, has brainwashed the city fans and then the rest of the country seem pretty made up with the set up as long as it stops us (or I guess the Salford team too if they were to challenge). The anything but Liverpool stuff when we won the league was strong. The international one from what I can tell, couldn't give 2 fucks. In the main it seems all about winning and nobody really cares how or why, as real Madrid proved for years with their cheating. The main objective seems.to be "we're not really cunts, how can you not believe us, look how much we love sport". I would say there would have been a much bigger reaction (like ESL) to city dodging ffp with UEFA or the subsequent refusal to cooperate with the PL if anyone really gave a shit. The only people up in arms about them are teams like us who can't compete with them but could otherwise. Sportswashing works.

It's a good job your pet hate isn't people who flounce off. Oh and fsg are cunts.

I just thought the idea of var was to get to the correct decision. It's not like he blew the whistle between his imagined push in the back and when walker just went through him. I really can't see why they can't award it - the VAR is definitely there to give what the ref missed.

Isn't that exactly what VAR is supposed to do, pick up on the shit the onfield referee misses?

Or fuck it off and if refs like moss can't keep up with play and they haven't got a var to bail them out, then they can be sacked and a younger and more in shape ref can take their place.

the problem i have with ineptness is i don't see how 2 officials can continually keep being inept. so i can accept moss is unfit and struggles to keep up. then if as a result he is too far away, give nothing and let the VAR pick up on what you have missed rather than just fucking guess, which is what he did on Saturday. Then, somehow the VAR contrives to completely reverse this decision (all this nonsense about they look at the video themselves, they're already guided by the VAR) - it just seems too often than not there is an outcome they want and will do anything they can to get it. For what reason? I have no fucking idea, but last season when VAR was re-running every situation until it found something when it suited and then glossing over things when it didn't, screams of there are other things at play. Now it might be subconscious biases. It might be Mike Riley has instructed them to be on the lookout for x, y or z. It could be anything other than what is should be, which is completely impartial refereeing.

no point to a re-vote now. we'd get fucked going back in to the EU at this point.