Financial Results for Year to May 31st 2021

[Scott_M]

3 minutes ago, Jarvinja Ilnow said:

You misunderstand me, I was being serious: I love a great set of accounts more than football.

Don’t we all. Remember, I support FSG, not LFC. 
 

I’m got some Kleenex, baby oil and a framed picture of John Henry ready for the Swiss Ramble breakdown later on.

 

Gobble.

[Scott_M]

1 minute ago, dockers_strike said:

Nah, disagree mate. Match day revenue was down 95% from £70m to £3m. Think that equates to over 13% of turnover.

 

Guess we'll have to wait and see it ticket prices go up but Id say using the shite as a reasoning isnt a great one.

I get all the figures, to me, they don’t justify any increase for next season.

[TheRedMachine]

1 hour ago, Daisy said:

No you regularly used that as an argument to defend FSG lack of spending. We threw away a league title defence for no reason. 

What a crock of shit.

[TheRedMachine]

FSG out brigade are weirdos.

[TD_LFC]

1 hour ago, Daisy said:

No you regularly used that as an argument to defend FSG lack of spending. We threw away a league title defence for no reason. 

Not sure signing Kabak permanently instead of loaning him would have made that much difference.

[TD_LFC]

42 minutes ago, Scott_M said:

Don’t we all. Remember, I support FSG, not LFC. 
 

I’m got some Kleenex, baby oil and a framed picture of John Henry ready for the Swiss Ramble breakdown later on.

 

Gobble.

Might have to steady yourself, don't think the full accounts get posted to Companies House for a few months yet. It was early May last year.

[dockers_strike]

5 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

Might have to steady yourself, don't think the full accounts get posted to Companies House for a few months yet. It was early May last year.

I think they get posted at the same time? Companies have (or had last time I was involved) 9 months after year end to lodge accounts with CH.

 

Companies House provisions allow full accounts not to be released to the public while abbreviated ones, which contain less commercially sensitive info, are available.

 

There might be some delay however in the relevant info being hosted on the CH website? No doubt one of the forum experts will be along to correct, if Im wrong!

[TD_LFC]

Maybe they'll be on tomorrow then.

 

[Edit] Just checked, last year the announcement on the website was the 27th April with the accounts posted on CH on the 7th May.

 

So next within the next few weeks.

[Kevin D]

59 minutes ago, Mook said:

It's not that weird, if the team is winning, the support is happy & not particularly arsed about the accounts.

 

Failing to sign a legitimate CB last January cost us the league title. It was an absolutely scandalous decision.

[Jarvinja Ilnow]

54 minutes ago, Scott_M said:

Don’t we all. Remember, I support FSG, not LFC. 
 

I’m got some Kleenex, baby oil and a framed picture of John Henry ready for the Swiss Ramble breakdown later on.

 

Gobble.

I lie my spreadsheets clean. Each to his own, though.

[Jarvinja Ilnow]

1 hour ago, TD_LFC said:

If they'd managed to get Konate in the January instead of having to wait we'd be further in the red and people would have been happier (yet also angrier that the accounts look worse).

 

It's a weird balancing act.

 

 

 

[TD_LFC]

3 minutes ago, Kevin D said:

 

Failing to sign a legitimate CB last January cost us the league title. It was an absolutely scandalous decision.

Aww you changed it to legitimate.

[Strontium]

1 hour ago, Josef Svejk said:

I'm thoroughly pissed off we don't owe £2bn to a Russian oligarch. 

 

Just turn the central heating up to full for a few days, job done.

[Numero Veinticinco]

Is this the set of accounts that finally proves how much money FSG have been illegally skimming off the top, or nah? Been waiting for that one for years. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

2 hours ago, Daisy said:

No you regularly used that as an argument to defend FSG lack of spending. We threw away a league title defence for no reason. 

Yeah. If we'd signed a top quality left-back, midfielder and forward that Summer, we might have got somewhere.

#FSGOut.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Two pages in and still no pictures of yachts; this place has gone to the dogs.

[dockers_strike]

43 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

Maybe they'll be on tomorrow then.

 

[Edit] Just checked, last year the announcement on the website was the 27th April with the accounts posted on CH on the 7th May.

 

So next within the next few weeks.

Soz, out of juice at the moment but will be back. EDIT appears I got a fast charge top up!

 

Yeah, the absolute backstop date is 9 months after accounts year end but they can file and release them any time they want in between if they wish.

 

I dont know why but lots of companies leave it until almost the last minute to do so. That and any operational needs can lead to the actual date of release moving about a little.

[Pony Princess]

15 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Two pages in and still no pictures of yachts; this place has gone to the dogs.

I saw this picture of an otter and thought you might enjoy it x 

 

[Harry Squatter]

Quite good when you compare it to a lot of other clubs. Even Bayern Munich are having to cut costs and possibly sell players. 

 

This season Liverpool should make a lot of money from gate revenue as we've had 5 extra cup games at Anfield with the possibility of another if we beat Norwich. Also received the maximum prize money from the CL having won all seven games and barring a massive collapse will get more money for getting to the last 8.

 

I think the standard chartered deal is up next season so Liverpool should be asking for a lot more than the current £40m a season.  Let's hope this Nike deal starts paying dividends. More success means more sponsors wanting to associate themselves with you.

[3 Stacks]

1 hour ago, Kevin D said:

 

Failing to sign a legitimate CB last January cost us the league title. It was an absolutely scandalous decision.

Are we pretending that Leipzig would have let us sign one of their players before playing them in the Champions League? Or that it was advantageous to try to do that?

[Bruce Spanner]

Has anyone shown any decency yet and resigned? 
 

Bunch of absolute fucking chancers.

[Bjornebye]

Does this mean Mbappes not coming? 

[Lee909]

2 hours ago, 3 Stacks said:

Are we pretending that Leipzig would have let us sign one of their players before playing them in the Champions League? Or that it was advantageous to try to do that?

 

Exactly this

I've said before,the moment t we drew Leipzig we weren't getting the CB we wanted. It was always likely to be a loan deal. 

[dockers_strike]

2 hours ago, Harry Squatter said:

Quite good when you compare it to a lot of other clubs. Even Bayern Munich are having to cut costs and possibly sell players. 

 

This season Liverpool should make a lot of money from gate revenue as we've had 5 extra cup games at Anfield with the possibility of another if we beat Norwich. Also received the maximum prize money from the CL having won all seven games and barring a massive collapse will get more money for getting to the last 8.

 

I think the standard chartered deal is up next season so Liverpool should be asking for a lot more than the current £40m a season.  Let's hope this Nike deal starts paying dividends. More success means more sponsors wanting to associate themselves with you.

Exactly this.

[Trumo]

5 hours ago, Scott_M said:

Possibly, but we do tend to follow The Ev’s lead on increases.

 

Ah, that narrows down who Kenwright was quoting then.