Tony Moanero

Getting a pointless answer in the Pointless final. Les Sealey just won me £2,500!

No. The synthetic biscuit flavour would interfere with that of the actual biscuit.

Nah, I used to be a secret lemonade wanker, but I’m semi-retired now.

Nah, not for me, Rem. I like to eat my biscuits, not drink them. Plus, I’m not really a big tea drinker. I tend to just dunk my biscuits and lash the remainder of the tea down the sink.

It’s all about opinions, I guess, for me Collymore had a lot more natural ability and was a better all round footballer.

Early 40s, but I grew up watching old footy videos. We had all manner of official club history and cup final videos and not just Liverpool ones. My dad is a proper anorak and used to attend football memorabilia fairs, so we had all sorts of videos that you didn’t see in ordinary shops. With regard to Emile Heskey, I have to disagree, mate. Heskey had a very effective partnership with Michael Owen, especially during the 2000-01 season, but on his day Collymore was a far superior player. Creativity, in my opinion, wouldn’t be a problem. Both full-backs were more than capable of getting forward. Ronnie Whelan was a much better player than he was/is given credit for. Collymore, of course, could drop deep when required.

Maradona and Mario Kempes Maradona and Daniel Passarella

Loads of inaccuracies on Transfermarkt. Yeah, Heighway was primarily a left-winger. Boss little compilation video, this.

In my opinion, the criticism that Dynamite has too many left wingers is a bit harsh. Peter Thompson was two footed and could comfortably play on the right. Billy Liddell, by all accounts, was capable of playing in a number of positions, including centre-forward. That said, I’m not keen on Kevin Sheedy as a centre midfielder.

When I was a kid, I had the 1974 FA Cup Final on video and watched it many times. Such a pity that Alec’s Lindsay’s goal was incorrectly disallowed, as it was a belter.

Galling? Fuck me! Why is it strange? People have always moaned about things that they like being changed.

People who say they’re interested in “the arts” when in reality they go the theatre from time to time, make homemade Christmas cards and read Martina Cole books.

The actors change, the character doesn’t. James Bond is James Bond.

James Bond’s character isn’t in keep with the 21st Century? Sound, just go back to making Bond films set in the 50s, 60s or whatever. Want a new character that is more in keeping with modern times? Sound, come up with something new. Of course, there probably isn’t the desire for this, as the James Bond franchise is incredibly lucrative.