Rushies tash

Yeah, I've been called out on that already. I must admit, I can't remember that much about him playing, just that the defence was largely shit at the time.

6/4 on that him being mentioned at all for the job will prompt more BBC left-wing bias nonsense.

Looking past the hypocrisy, I can understand wanting to acknowledge a foreign fan base to build revenues etc. but what is with their fucking obsession with being the first do do anything? I guess they weren't the first team with an American player or they'd be bleating about that as well. In fact, their 'biblical' lineage goes back as far as erm, 1992. I wonder as well, if their 'passionate fanbase' managed to fill a 100k stadium on a pre season tour? Great comment below this tweet about someone celebrating a shit that morning being less weird than this.

He was a great sweeper, so probably best suited to being the centre of a back three rather than playing in a back four. I think most players were largely awful under Souness.

Funnily enough, my memories of Mark Wright are largely positive. Maybe the problem is my memory...!

I never took to him. He played well enough for Wimbledon, but I think my memory of him is tarnished by the performances of our team at the time.

He was. But the club should've known that before they signed him. Like they should have known Dicks, Scales, Piechnik, Kvarme, Walters, Saunders etc. weren't good enough before we signed them.

I don't really blame him for being who he was. I blame our recruitment at the time and basically the way the whole club was being run. Utter shambles.

Nope. Doesn't really go past players anymore and can't shoot. He'd also more than likely get labelled a diver as soon as he pulled the kind of shite he gets away with at City.

So he should be - they love playing against teams with a high line so they can just twat it up the field for the likes of Rashford to chase. I wouldn't be surprised to see us a little deeper on Sunday.

That's the ball they'll be looking for all day long on Sunday.

The ref abandoned the game and the result awarded to City. Regardless, other results went against Utd meaning they'd have gone down anyway.

If you spoke to some, hooliganism started and ended with us in 85.

Invading the pitch in an effort to get a match abandoned? That'd never happen these days. Not without some serious sanctions. Oh, wait...

Utd looking to hit early long balls against Atalanta's high line. Can see them doing the same on Sunday.