Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

The first part - the power in history has always been with the Church. They were the original politicos.

 

In italics - you live in the UK and you think religion is way down the list?

The power in history has always been with the ruling classes.  Religions and their followers have, at various times (to the present day) been persecuted by the ruling classes; sometimes in the name of another religion, sometimes in the name of none.  Rulers keep their subjects in line by enlisting them in the greatest battle of all: the battle between "Us" and "Them".  Sometimes they use religion to define Us & Them. To blame religion for all these centuries of violence and oppression is like blaming hammers for the Yorkshire Ripper murders.

 

(And, yes, I live in the UK and this forum has more influence on my daily life than all the religions combined.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

The power in history has always been with the ruling classes.  Religions and their followers have, at various times (to the present day) been persecuted by the ruling classes; sometimes in the name of another religion, sometimes in the name of none.  Rulers keep their subjects in line by enlisting them in the greatest battle of all: the battle between "Us" and "Them".  Sometimes they use religion to define Us & Them. To blame religion for all these centuries of violence and oppression is like blaming hammers for the Yorkshire Ripper murders.

 

(And, yes, I live in the UK and this forum has more influence on my daily life than all the religions combined.)

 

I think you would have to be extraordinarily naive to not realize throughout the fat end of history the ruling class and the church were one and the same.

 

Who is the head of the Church of England anyway?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheHowieLama said:

 

I think you would have to be extraordinarily naive to not realize throughout the fat end of history the ruling class and the church were one and the same.

 

Who is the head of the Church of England anyway?

I think you'd have to be extraordinarily... something not to realise that I acknowledged that.

 

The head of the CofE is the King.  Do you know how much impact Jug-Ears has on my daily life?  Less than the GF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Er...?

 

What impact do you think the CofE has on my daily life?

 

What impact do I think the Monarchy/Church have had on shaping the current state of the UK, in turn, just about everything in your daily life?

 

Alot. I already said that. Do you think austerity was a political concept before it was a religious one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

What impact do I think the Monarchy/Church have had on shaping the current state of the UK, in turn, just about everything in your daily life?

 

Alot. I already said that. Do you think austerity was a political concept before it was a religious one?

You're wrong.  There's next to nothing in my daily life that is shaped by religion. The economic policy of austerity certainly has no religious basis.

 

Do you live in the UK?

 

(The fact that the CofE was founded following a political spat between Henry VIII and the Catholic Church sort of reinforces my point: it's all about power politics; religion is secondary, at best.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

You're wrong.  There's next to nothing in my daily life that is shaped by religion. The economic policy of austerity certainly has no religious basis.

 

Do you live in the UK?

 

(The fact that the CofE was founded following a political spat between Henry VIII and the Catholic Church sort of reinforces my point: it's all about power politics; religion is secondary, at best.)

 

 

First I think you have started to conflate religion with the Church and it's actions.

 

On the bold - passing the hat amongst the peasants was austerity for centuries. The concept of austerity is literally rooted in the Church and was co opted by the gubmint, guilt trip and all.

You may want to think that the religious folks have had no effect on the policies of the past, shaping the current and will continue to - moreso than any other outside influence - but I disagree. No biggie.

 

Live there? Fuck no, it's freezing half the time.

US for me and I have no reservations about acknowledging the massive influence the Church folks have had on this country, past and present. Roe v Wade was just repealed man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that, in the UK, we don't have anything like the religious fundamentalist lobby that is so powerful in the States.  We have an established church, but (apart from things like Easter & Christmas holidays and shit telly on a Sunday morning) it's really easy to ignore.

 

The austere living promoted by the early Christian communities was all about looking after each other and looking after those worse off than themselves.  (You could call it proto-Socialism.). Economic austerity - as practised by ruling classes either in the name of religion or in its absence - is the opposite of that: it's just all about power and greed.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Horrible to think things like this still happen in the world:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/nov/22/jim-irsay-dui-arrest-white-billonaire-prejudjice
 

Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay said his March 2014 arrest for driving under the influence was a result of prejudice against him for being white and wealthy.

 

The longtime NFL owner spoke about the circumstances of his arrest in an interview with the HBO show Real Sports that aired on Tuesday. Irsay later pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of operating a vehicle while impaired after initially facing four additional counts of possession of a controlled substance.

 

“I am prejudiced against because I’m a rich, white billionaire,” Irsay told HBO’s Andrea Kremer. “If I’m just the average guy down the block, they’re not pulling me in, of course not.”


 

Asked how he thinks it sounds for a white billionaire to claim that he’s a victim of prejudice, Irsay stood by his remarks.

 

“I don’t care what it sounds like,” Irsay said. “It’s the truth ... I could give a damn what people think how anything sounds or sounds like. The truth is the truth, and I know the truth.”

 

Police in the Indianapolis suburb of Carmel pulled Irsay over after observing a man in a Toyota Highlander driving slowly, stopping in the roadway and failing to use a turn signal. Authorities discovered various prescription drugs in Irsay’s vehicle along with more than $29,000 in cash.

 

A toxicology report showed Irsay had the painkillers oxycodone and hydrocodone as well as alprazolam, which is used to treat anxiety, in his system at the time of his arrest. Officers on the scene said he had trouble reciting the alphabet and failed other field sobriety tests.

 

The NFL suspended Irsay for the first six of his team’s games the following season and fined him $500,000.

 

Irsay claimed that when he was asked to take a field sobriety test and looked unsteady walking, it was because he had just had hip surgery. Asked why he pleaded guilty if he had been profiled, Irsay said he just wanted to get it over with.

 

The Carmel police department said in an emailed statement to the Indianapolis Star: “We are very sorry to hear that comment about our officers and our department. We have a very professional agency consisting of officers that strive to protect our community with integrity and professionalism.”

 

The 64-year-old businessman also told Real Sports that he has gone to rehab for addiction 15 times and that he once nearly died of an overdose, adding that “addiction and alcoholism is a fatal disease.”
 

Irsay’s father, Robert Irsay, built his fortune through a series of successful heating and air-conditioning companies before purchasing the Baltimore Colts and controversially relocating the team to Indiana in 1984.

 

Jim Irsay has owned the Colts since 1997, when he emerged victorious from a legal battle with his stepmother over the ownership of the team following the death of his father.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

My point is that, in the UK, we don't have anything like the religious fundamentalist lobby that is so powerful in the States.  We have an established church, but (apart from things like Easter & Christmas holidays and shit telly on a Sunday morning) it's really easy to ignore.

 

The austere living promoted by the early Christian communities was all about looking after each other and looking after those worse off than themselves.  (You could call it proto-Socialism.). Economic austerity - as practised by ruling classes either in the name of religion or in its absence - is the opposite of that: it's just all about power and greed.

We do have 21 bishops in the house of lords, mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

One of those times where you realise how badly passive, personable hosts will just let people editorialise in the very worst way without challenge. All about keeping an open mind, of course.

 

It's the racist murder of Anthony Walker, he's dismissing as a "scrap", the rat.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Fucking grim.

 

 

 

Horrible little twat. 

 

28 minutes ago, Pidge said:

 

One of those times where you realise how badly passive, personable hosts will just let people editorialise in the very worst way without challenge. All about keeping an open mind, of course.

 

It's the racist murder of Anthony Walker, he's dismissing as a "scrap", the rat.

 

Another horrible twat. I used to listen to that James fells podcasts a bit earlier this year but he does have some utter cunts on and when he has the cunts on he generally ends up coming across like one himself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...