Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

Why would you say obviously?

 

When you call a supporter of a certain team a Hun is that racist?

 

You're looking at the wrong bingo word. Of course there's a racial element to it but it's not racist.

 

Now, look for examples of sectarian bigotry on here and you will find it easily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

That all Muslims are the same race?

It would be directly implied if Islamophobia is racist. Otherwise it couldn't be right?

 

In my book being prejudiced to someone because they are muslim is racist. I might be wrong, you could have a different definition. Ask a few of the racists on here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Was he? Must have a had a shit lawyer. I've been to plenty of Old Firms and been around Celtic supporters all my life, not one has ever aligned the term "hun" with any religious association. 

 

He appealed the religious prejudiced ruling and lost. The ruling was made by Scottish folks so they must be clued in.

 

Their words:

 

"The fact that the word 'hun' is used as a derogatory term to describe supporters of Rangers FC, who are perceived to be predominantly of the Protestant faith, is, in our view, a matter of judicial knowledge."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheHowieLama said:

 

He appealed the religious prejudiced ruling and lost. The ruling was made by Scottish folks so they must be clued in.

 

Like I said, I don't see a racial element to the word. Have you got a link to the case? Passed me by. Ta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

 

Like I said, I don't see a racial element to the word. Have you got a link to the case? Passed me by. Ta

 

What I said:

Hun certainly has a religious connotation.

 

You do see a racist element to the words fenian and taig though right?

 

https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/10/09/news/scottish_judges_uphold_conviction_that_football_fan_s_hun_insult_was_sectarian-3682467/#:~:text=His legal team attempted to,are believed to support Rangers.

 

“Whatever the historical origins of the word, in its modern usage well informed persons in the west of Scotland recognise that when used in a footballing context, the word has now been adopted as an abusive sectarian term used to cause offence to those of the Protestant faith, not simply as a reference to a supporter of Rangers FC.

"It is, in that respect, no different to the use of the term 'fenian' as a form of sectarian abuse to describe Celtic supporters who are perceived to be predominantly of the Roman Catholic faith.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

What I said:

Hun certainly has a religious connotation.

 

You do see a racist element to the words fenian and taig though right?

 

https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/10/09/news/scottish_judges_uphold_conviction_that_football_fan_s_hun_insult_was_sectarian-3682467/#:~:text=His legal team attempted to,are believed to support Rangers.

 

“Whatever the historical origins of the word, in its modern usage well informed persons in the west of Scotland recognise that when used in a footballing context, the word has now been adopted as an abusive sectarian term used to cause offence to those of the Protestant faith, not simply as a reference to a supporter of Rangers FC.

"It is, in that respect, no different to the use of the term 'fenian' as a form of sectarian abuse to describe Celtic supporters who are perceived to be predominantly of the Roman Catholic faith.”

 

It's a matter of opinion isn't it. That said< I agreed not to use it on here anymore when someone went crying to Dave. It offended them so I rightly agreed not to use the term. It's not really a term I use lightly anyway. "the word has now been adopted" smacks of "We don't like it so let's say it's religious despite it stemming from a newspaper article and not making any fucking sense religiously" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

Doesn't that make criticism of only a select few government's racist?

Seems a strange pov.

 

No, I think you could be prejudiced against any national or ethnic group.

 

Okay, let's try a thought experiment. Is it racist to arrest thieves?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bjornebye said:

 

People are questioning the death toll figures coming out of Gaza. People question a lot of things. It's not an exclusive thing against Jewish people no matter who much you try to spin it that way. 

 

Also, what's the harm in people wondering what was on the t-shirt? Do you think that Stuart Seldowitz should be jailed for his racism as well? 


How did I know this wouldn’t get an answer. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

No, I think you could be prejudiced against any national or ethnic group.

 

Okay, let's try a thought experiment. Is it racist to arrest thieves?

 

Before we do the experiment why have you changed the word at the base of the conversation?

 

The reply was:

 

I don't agree that criticism of a government's actions cannot be racism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

Before we do the experiment why have you changed the word at the base of the conversation?

 

The reply was:

 

I don't agree that criticism of a government's actions cannot be racism.

 

It was my understanding that racism encompassed prejudice against a person because of their racial, ethnic or national background.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

On another topic I doubt that Seldowitz will be charged.


I doubt he will also. What was the term used earlier? Different rules for different groups? Now imagine if somebody said that regarding Jewish people. Would that be anti-Semitic? 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

So it's not racist to be prejudiced against a person because of their racial, ethnic or national background? I have to say, that would be a minority opinion.

 

Ethnic/ National background? That is the question we are discussing.

 

Folks in the US/UK all share a national background yet can certainly be racist towards one another.

 

Leave the minorities opinions out of this....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

Ethnic/ National background? That is the question we are discussing.

 

Folks in the US/UK all share a national background yet can certainly be racist towards one another.

 

Leave the minorities opinions out of this....

 

To me, this is confusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...