Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Russia World Cup 18


Bjornebye
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't think England have the better players at all.

 

Croatia's forwards are more experienced, intelligent, and work much better as a collective. Excellent right back (for both teams), and Lovren and Vida seemed to work well as a pair. And, obviously, their midfield is on a completely different level.

 

Southgate definitely made mistakes though. The biggest of which was playing a one man centre midfield, as Alli and Lingard were largely a complete waste of space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Looks to have been about as good a World Cup as we could have hoped for.

 

Lovren and Henderson aside none of our players have really stacked up loads of games/minutes.

 

No injuries.

 

A lot of our rivals best players are stuck out there for the maximum possible time.

 

Ingerlund squad full of Spurs, Mancs and Belgium same with key Chelsea players too....France has a couple of Chelsea as well.

 

Gonna be some real disruption to those teams at start of season assuming they will be looking at 3 weeks holiday then you are talking back at clubs just 1 week before season starts.

 

Could work out very nicely for us that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should change the format of the WC to the one used in that Nike advert a few years back. Three-a-side played in a cage on a converted oil tanker. One rule - first goal wins. Losers have to jump off the ship and swim home. Just park it in the middle of the Pacific.

Said during the match someone should tell Southgate they changed the rules so if there's a shootout and it's level after all the players have had a go it comes down to the Coaches, watch his colour drain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think England have the better players at all.

 

Croatia's forwards are more experienced, intelligent, and work much better as a collective. Excellent right back (for both teams), and Lovren and Vida seemed to work well as a pair. And, obviously, their midfield is on a completely different level.

 

Southgate definitely made mistakes though. The biggest of which was playing a one man centre midfield, as Alli and Lingard were largely a complete waste of space.

 

 

I think Croatia are a far better team front to back.  Our midfield was rubbish once they blew themselves out; Croatia realised they couldn't chase around forever, so England played right into their hands, and effectively invited Croatia to attack at will.  Modric and the other Croatian midfielders were superb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think England have the better players at all.

 

Croatia's forwards are more experienced, intelligent, and work much better as a collective. Excellent right back (for both teams), and Lovren and Vida seemed to work well as a pair. And, obviously, their midfield is on a completely different level.

 

Southgate definitely made mistakes though. The biggest of which was playing a one man centre midfield, as Alli and Lingard were largely a complete waste of space.

Lingaard regularly ran more metres than any other player, and completed the most sprints, but agree he was ineffective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought England played really well first half but then after that they were poor and ended up reverting to type and playing long balls.

 

I’d expect them to get better over the next few years if they keep on the same path.

 

England's performance against Iceland in Euro 2016 was one of most astonishingly inept things I have ever seen on a sporting field. Their inability to keep the ball was so total that you wondered whether it was deliberate. I know The Owl was stinking the place out - no doubt he warned the players beforehand about how Iceland were formidable opponents - but this has been a feature of England for years now. So it was a surprise to see England against Colombia and Sweden, and in the first half against Croatia, succeeding at such Maradonaesque stuff as passing the ball ten yards to a teammate in plenty of space. I think the burden of expectation got to them in the end and any discipline that Southgate drilled into them crumbled. Still, they've shown they are capable of doing the basics and they might blossom in the less high-octane atmosphere of the European Championships.

 

Ah, who am I kidding? The scumbag press will have marked all their cards before the first ball is kicked that England Expects and they'll wilt accordingly. Cue another 52 years of hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always wonder when a player is immobile with an injury like Trippier was, and there aren’t any subs left and it’s a huge game, is there any role he can play on the pitch? Even standing static on one wing so the opposition at least have to think about him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep thinking it was mostly the mentality, character, psychology.

 First half went exactly as I expected from Croatia and I think England expected to see the game out safely after that little break in play around 65 minutes whilst Croatia were beginning to despair and the goal was like an adrenalin shot straight through Uma Thurman's heart. England than felt collective unconsciousness coming to the fore and transforming into an ineffectual individual id of every player thus affecting the trans-substiation from nailed on finalists into bottlers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the problem comes when he has the ball.

I thought he was pretty decent. Certainly more dangerous than Sterling when he’s near the opposition’s goal.

 

I thought Alli stank the place out for the whole tournament, one goal aside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought he was pretty decent. Certainly more dangerous than Sterling when he’s near the opposition’s goal.

 

I thought Alli stank the place out for the whole tournament, one goal aside.

Don't forget good whinging and diving.

 

Granted I don't like him anyway, but he was in uber cunt mode for the whole match last night.

 

I was fuming watching the cunt moaning and falling over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always wonder when a player is immobile with an injury like Trippier was, and there aren’t any subs left and it’s a huge game, is there any role he can play on the pitch? Even standing static on one wing so the opposition at least have to think about him?

 

I was once left up front for 30 minutes ' To act as a nuisance ' in a Zingari League game when we had no subs and subsequently found out I had broken my ankle in 2 places.

 

And had to pay £2.50 subs for the privilege.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think England have the better players at all.

 

Croatia's forwards are more experienced, intelligent, and work much better as a collective. Excellent right back (for both teams), and Lovren and Vida seemed to work well as a pair. And, obviously, their midfield is on a completely different level.

 

Southgate definitely made mistakes though. The biggest of which was playing a one man centre midfield, as Alli and Lingard were largely a complete waste of space.

Personally I do think we have got better players but I can see why people disagree. They’re a level above anything else England had played though and my point is still the same. I can’t remember the last time in a knockout game England beat a team that was as good as them or better than them on paper never mind getting beat by teams that are worse. They never over achieve and it’s always down to the managers doing stupid things. They had good enough players to beat Croatia but didn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...