Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

£10m a month interest?


dave u
 Share

Recommended Posts

"a daily rate of 9 per cent per year"

 

How does that work?

 

It means they charge the equivalent of 9% a year. But its calculated daily like interest in a normal savings account.

 

The interest is actually

 

9/365 % per day.

 

Or 9% of the average daily balance of the outstanding debt, per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Rory Smith still reporting a debt of 237m today. After Chris B story yesterday all the Liverpool fans in the Dailys should be building on what Chris B wrote yesterday and said live on air on Talksport on Saturday night to crank the pressure up even more.

 

I can't believe that they would all be so foolhardy not to act on this. It seems like they are 'cutting the owners some slack' by not acting on the story that Chris B broke yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rory Smith still reporting a debt of 237m today. After Chris B story yesterday all the Liverpool fans in the Dailys should be building on what Chris B wrote yesterday and said live on air on Talksport on Saturday night to crank the pressure up even more.

 

I can't believe that they would all be so foolhardy not to act on this. It seems like they are 'cutting the owners some slack' by not acting on the story that Chris B broke yesterday.

 

 

Why don't you start a campaign to make Bascombe manager, or play up front with Torres, or chair the board?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If these two cunts could currently pass the Premier Leagues Fit and Proper Owners test, than anybody can. There should be ongoing assessments as to the suitability and fitness of ownership.

As I've said before, physical harm is the only thing that will sort these two out. Kidnap them and their fucking Sons and torture the cunts. Beat them up badly every day until the take over is complete. Then when it is, shoot them and leave them in a field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest The Chimp

Cheers Dave. And a bit off topic but for any Aussies on here; Liverpool's greatest goals on One HD (Aldo has just scored against Forest in the semi).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The debt as of 31st July was £266m, We have to pay £7.5m on 15/8/10 and another £7.5m on 31/8/10.

 

Do you know what that consists of? Interest only (for what period if so), refinancing costs, anything else?

 

If there is no sale of the club by that date the debt on the club will be £282.4m.

 

If we make the above payments, how does the debt go up with roughly the same amount? What is the link to the sale (apart from the obvious, new owner pays off the debt)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's more in the vicinity of £40 million per year.

 

Still a lot of money though.

 

Plus the debt rearrangement fees which were £30m last time (for, what, six months? twelve?). So that's at least £70m a year. Plus the compound interest on the 'loans' made by the cowboys.

 

Atk is right. if the takeover doesn't happen, we're no longer viable as a club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick point on this. Just because we are paying £10m a month, doesn't translate to £120m a year as the extension was a six month one, and runs out in October. In that six month period, we are paying £10m a month, meaning the debt will have risen by £60m since April. It's already much more than the 237m being reported in the Telegraph today.

 

The agreement is there to force a sale (as well as for RBS to line their pockets of course), and although it looks like we're close to that happening, you have to be wary about the report by Mullock in the Sunday Mirror saying the owners will fight the sale in court. Mullock gets his info from the Hicks camp, so it tells you that they don't plan on going quietly.

 

It really is a fucking scandal, I'm disappointed that more isn't being made of it by the press to be honest.

 

I'm hoping that SoS are looking into it and are preparing to get some kind of statement out, as they are in the best position to then get the national and local media on it.

 

If they aren't gone by October, God knows what will happen. If they get another deal like this one, or worse, we're genuinely, seriously fucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick point on this. Just because we are paying £10m a month, doesn't translate to £120m a year as the extension was a six month one, and runs out in October. In that six month period, we are paying £10m a month, meaning the debt will have risen by £60m since April. It's already much more than the 237m being reported in the Telegraph today.

 

The agreement is there to force a sale (as well as for RBS to line their pockets of course), and although it looks like we're close to that happening, you have to be wary about the report by Mullock in the Sunday Mirror saying the owners will fight the sale in court. Mullock gets his info from the Hicks camp, so it tells you that they don't plan on going quietly.

 

It really is a fucking scandal, I'm disappointed that more isn't being made of it by the press to be honest.

 

I'm hoping that SoS are looking into it and are preparing to get some kind of statement out, as they are in the best position to then get the national and local media on it.

 

If they aren't gone by October, God knows what will happen. If they get another deal like this one, or worse, we're genuinely, seriously fucked.

 

Depends on the terms they agreed to Dave as to whether or not they contest the sale.

 

When they got the extension for the loan on RBS they will have obviously needed to sign a contract it seems agreeing to the board having the say on the sale.

 

If they then decide to contest the sale of the club then obviously they are in breach of the terms and would have to suffer the consequence of that.

 

If they do contest the sale though i would imagine RBS are still in a position to ask for the debt to be repaid and therefore the owners would have to find the money for that as well as the expenses for the court battle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If they aren't gone by October, God knows what will happen. If they get another deal like this one, or worse, we're genuinely, seriously fucked.

 

I agree, these figures look worringly "out of business" like if they're here much longer. Or "at best" every asset we've got sold in January and we get relegated.

 

I'll know no doubt get called hysterical but people need to look at the figures, we cant go on like this, it's not do-able.

 

We desperately need RBS's help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We desperately need RBS's help.

 

Another 6 months extension on £10m/month interest? No thanks.

 

We need to get sold, that is the only way out.

 

And keep everything crossed the new guy(s) will be better than C&A.

 

Our current position is un fucking imaginable - just shows RBS are also cunts who are focussed on getting as many millions as possible out of us before they lose our interest. Also, worryingly, shows they probably are willing to extend the deal as long as we pay their huge interests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another 6 months extension on £10m/month interest? No thanks.

 

We need to get sold, that is the only way out.

 

And keep everything crossed the new guy(s) will be better than C&A.

 

Our current position is un fucking imaginable - just shows RBS are also cunts who are focussed on getting as many millions as possible out of us before they lose our interest. Also, worryingly, shows they probably are willing to extend the deal as long as we pay their huge interests.

 

Think you've completely missed the point of what I was saying. We need their "help". Not loans.

 

They can squeeze the owners out and we need them to do just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regards this claim regards the debt from Bascombe.

 

We are in the sale process and news of the debt being £10m a month means that Gillett and Hicks are desperate to sell.

 

Do you not think that if Bascombe had printed a pack of lies that Gillett and Hicks would not have their lawyers onto it.

 

Bascombe had been specific at where the figure of £10m a month comes from and it could quite easily be denied and court action taken if it was false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick point on this. Just because we are paying £10m a month, doesn't translate to £120m a year as the extension was a six month one, and runs out in October. In that six month period, we are paying £10m a month, meaning the debt will have risen by £60m since April. It's already much more than the 237m being reported in the Telegraph today.

 

The agreement is there to force a sale (as well as for RBS to line their pockets of course), and although it looks like we're close to that happening, you have to be wary about the report by Mullock in the Sunday Mirror saying the owners will fight the sale in court. Mullock gets his info from the Hicks camp, so it tells you that they don't plan on going quietly.

 

It really is a fucking scandal, I'm disappointed that more isn't being made of it by the press to be honest.

 

I'm hoping that SoS are looking into it and are preparing to get some kind of statement out, as they are in the best position to then get the national and local media on it.

 

If they aren't gone by October, God knows what will happen. If they get another deal like this one, or worse, we're genuinely, seriously fucked.

 

If this is true, and bascombe is hardly blemish free, then why would other journos just report what he's saying without their 'sources' confirming it or seeing the 'evidence' atk has?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...