*Shakes head* Everton again.

[Arniepie]

3 hours ago, Harry Squatter said:

Been blocked by both his accounts. They are such cry baby shithouses on Twitter. They like to give it out but as soon as you reply, even without being abusive They block you. I've been blocked by evertonians that I've never had any interaction with on Twitter. Theybare the biggest creases going.

he used to come out with all sort of stuff about hillsborough. I think he got threatened a few times so he just relentlessly tweets about us being cheats now 

[Bobby Hundreds]

I hope they go bust and I've never ever wanted that before but after their reaction to all this shit, fuck them. Cheats. Stand behind them for cheating! what about Leicester and the like who paid the full price for Evertons cheating. Trying to rub our faces in it when they had Uncle Uzzy in the background, no morals involved there from high horse FC.

[Scott_M]

2 hours ago, DalyanPete said:

Interesting stuff.

My take on it,

another part of the shites defence is,

Why punish us when the rules are getting changed anyway?

Well pardon fuckin me, yes rules can and will change but until that point those rules stand.

 

 

Based on what they’ve been charged for, it would be interesting to see if they would pass or fail those rules. 

[Scott_M]

From 11 years ago. Almost as if the rules and consequences have been there all along…

 

[Strontium]

35 minutes ago, Scott_M said:

From 11 years ago. Almost as if the rules and consequences have been there all along…

 

 

I do find it interesting that transfer spending has more or less quadrupled in that time, but the £105m limit has remained the same.

[sir roger]

2 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

I do find it interesting that transfer spending has more or less quadrupled in that time, but the £105m limit has remained the same.

 

Ours hasnt

[Scott_M]

[Scott_M]

20 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

I do find it interesting that transfer spending has more or less quadrupled in that time, but the £105m limit has remained the same.

If revenue has increased that much in said period (like ours has) then it shouldn’t be an issue. 

[Strontium]

18 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Ours hasnt

 

Yes, I think it's pretty safe to assume we are never going to fall foul of spending rules.

[Scott_M]

[Carra_is_legend]

3 minutes ago, Scott_M said:

He is spot on there.

 

The club have led the fans down the garden path and the stupid cunts are so thick to not understand it. They should be absolutely fuming at the ownership and board, not keep spouting some bullshit about corruption.

[Anubis]

 

Should point out this guy seems pretty pro-City, but he does seem to have read the Everton judgement inside out.

[Denny Crane]

2 hours ago, Barrington Womble said:

 

The latest UEFA rules have moved away from the FFP that has been used previously and gone to this new sustainability model (with some formal tariffs for non-compliance). As of this season clubs are now allowed to spend just 70% of their turnover on agents fees, amortisation (trading profit included in this) and salaries. There are two preparation seasons, this where clubs will be allowed 90% this season and next, where they will 80%. And just as importantly, there are time limits around submission and non-submission would mean exclusion from next season. 

 

In this context, it is much tighter financial control and allows less scope for bottomless pockets to spend wildly. Obviously there are different challenges around enforcement with people like city who will inflate sponsorships. But that was true of the last regulations. 

 

Theis looks a lot of scope for oil rich clubs they can spend widely,  just get fined. PSG are apparently in the second time breach. The below is the new disciplinary guidelines from Uefa. I  suspect PSG would have to execeute somebody at HT to get kicked out of Europe as they can pay the fines. 

 

[Bobby Hundreds]

1 hour ago, Anubis said:

 

Should point out this guy seems pretty pro-City, but he does seem to have read the Everton judgement inside out.

That 40 million pre planning allowance better be added on and for their outright petulance and utter cheek to be claiming they are the victims in all of this their covid losses should be adjusted to the league average add that on too, not for the fairness to Everton but to every club that was affected by Covid but still didn't use it as a chance to fraud the league.

[Anubis]

This guy won’t be popular among his bretheren.

 

[Anubis]

So the clowns tried to claim the loan was for the stadium having lodged a document with companies house that categorically stated it wasn’t.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Just now, Anubis said:

So the clowns tried to claim the loan was for the stadium having lodged a document with companies house that categorically stated it wasn’t.

They are special.

[Anubis]

Also, predicting they’d finish 6th. LMAO.

[Arniepie]

It is mad how the ire has gone from being directed at the club,like the past couple of seasons,to the premier league,when the club even acknowledge they are in the wrong.

 

bloo logic. 

[Babb'sBurstNad]

Have to say I find it a bit odd Carra telling them hard truths, when he was front and centre pushing the "teams tried to leave the league and got less of a punishment" lie.

[littletedwest]

4 hours ago, Strontium said:

 

Yes, I think it's pretty safe to assume we are never going to fall foul of spending rules.

We'd probably be the first club sanctioned for being mingebags

[Anubis]

 

 

 

 

“We’re sexy and we know it!”

[Chocoholic]

What would the Everton Board do?

 

1 hour ago, Anubis said:

So the clowns tried to claim the loan was for the stadium having lodged a document with companies house that categorically stated it wasn’t.

 

Everton, aren't we?

[Lee909]

1 hour ago, Anubis said:

 

 

 

 

“We’re sexy and we know it!”

 

He's does realise a transfer ban doesn't stop teams buying your players?

 

Also who the fuck do they have the top 6 would want other than Braithwaite and possibly Onana. 

[Mudface]

Nicely done.