Dominic Solanke

[Ginny]

Best player to pull on the red shirt since Gerrard, Kenny and Suarez

[Bamo]

Maradona-Messi-Aguero-Pogba-Solanke

Pongolle and Le Tallec were ahead of Ronaldo and Tevez in the under 17 World cup I recall.

[alles ist gut]

Won more than the rest of our team already

 

Disgraceful disrespect to Wisdom's league & cup double in Austria

[VERBAL DIARRHEA]

Says it all about the level of both Ojo and Ejaria that they can't get into the starting XI.

 

Solanke has had a quiet game so far.

 

Josh Onomah looks a beast. Spurs have got a hell of a player there.

To be fair Ojo totally changed the semifinal when he came on.

[jimmycase]

chelsea set to demand £10m for solanke at any tribunal according to some newspaper reports. Cant see the club being too impressed about that.

[Lee909]

They'll start stupidly high amd we will go low

 

6ml i reckon

[VERBAL DIARRHEA]

They can ask what they want the Tribunal set the fee. We pYed 6.5m with 1.5m add ones and a 20% sell on for Ings, who was a PL regular with an England cap. Probably 6/7m with add ons.

[jimmycase]

They can ask what they want the Tribunal set the fee. We pYed 6.5m with 1.5m add ones and a 20% sell on for Ings, who was a PL regular with an England cap. Probably 6/7m with add ons.

 

And fees have inflated massively in the last 12 months dont forget. Wouldnt surprise me if it's a straight fee that the tribunal do award them £10m.

[VERBAL DIARRHEA]

And fees have inflated massively in the last 12 months dont forget. Wouldnt surprise me if it's a straight fee that the tribunal do award them £10m.

I would pay 10m as he's well worth it. Worst case scenario you sell him for double in a few years.

[Ne Moe Imya]

These things tend to be briefed to the journos long before it happens, and they are pretty well known to everyone before the player moves.  You think clubs would risk signing someone if there was a chance it was 2m and a chance it was 10m?

 

It will be marginally above 3m now that Chelsea have had a chance to get the 10m figure out there, but it will be much closer to 3 than 10.

[jimmycase]

These things tend to be briefed to the journos long before it happens, and they are pretty well known to everyone before the player moves.  You think clubs would risk signing someone if there was a chance it was 2m and a chance it was 10m?

 

It will be marginally above 3m now that Chelsea have had a chance to get the 10m figure out there, but it will be much closer to 3 than 10.

 

Really? I think with Ings costing what, £6m plus sell on, that a tribunal will use that as a starting figure then consider how much fees have been inflated by the tv income.

 

If chelsea are looking for straight cash with no sell on, I think they'll get £10m award. If they want a sell on clause, they'll probably get around £8m with 20% sell on.

 

Im not bothered if we do end up paying £10m for him though.

[Grinch]

I would pay 10m as he's well worth it. Worst case scenario you sell him for double in a few years.

That's a million miles off the worst case scenario.

 

He'll probably end up in the lower leagues like most reserve players too.

[VERBAL DIARRHEA]

That's a million miles off the worst case scenario.

He'll probably end up in the lower leagues like most reserve players too.

In your opinion. In mine he has real quality and will at worst be a good squad player or be sold at a profit. We got 15m for Ibe who is crap.

[an tha]

10m?

 

No chance....5 tops.

 

Kid has never even played a top flight game in England - not even a game at championship level.

 

Ings had over 100 games and 40 goals for Burnley including a full season in the top flight where he scored 11.

[VERBAL DIARRHEA]

5m would be nice, he in my opinion is going to be a good player. Player !

[TheHowieLama]

We can hope for the best worst case scenario certainly.

[TheHowieLama]

Well someone told me yesterday
That when you throw your love dosh away
You act as if you just don't care
You look as if you're going somewhere

But I just can't convince myself
I couldn't live with no one else
And I can only play that part
And sit and nurse my broken heart

Solanke

Solanke

Solanke

Solanke

[Cardie]

It's worth refering to how the PFCC assess the compensation, and it's structure.

 

"PFCC hearings require each club to provide evidence to support their valuation of the player in question. In making its judgment the committee will take into account the costs of both clubs in operating a Football Academy or Centre of Excellence, as well as the age and playing record of the player, the length of time he was registered with his original club, the terms offered by both clubs, the status of the two clubs, the substantiated interest shown by other clubs in acquiring the registration of the player and any amounts paid by the original club to acquire the player in the first place.

 

Unlike FIFA’s formulaic approach which provides foreign clubs with a fixed tariff for compensation, this domestic process is said to provide the advantage of  allowing greater flexibility in setting the level of compensation according to the merits of each individual case.  The counter to that is that – unlike with the FIFA tariff – there is always inherent uncertainty, and this in my experience can work against players ; particularly lower down the Football League  where clubs often feel that they can not afford to carry the risk of uncertainty.  Or they may simply feel that the signing of a player governed by the PFCC regime is too complex.

 

In deciding on a compensation figure, it is not uncommon for the PFCC to set fees that build as the player becomes more established at first team level.   It has now become quite usual for clubs to receive a basic compensation fee with further payments becoming due on the player’s debut, following a certain numbers of first-team appearances and after international appearances. It is also usual for there to be a sell-on fee should the player be sold at a profit at any point in the future."

 

And also the terms of Ings compensation agreement.

 

"DANNY INGS

 

Danny Ings signed for Burnley as a 19 year old in the summer of 2011 after many years at Bournemouth.

 

It was reported that Burnley had paid a transfer fee in the region of £1 million.

 

Danny appeared 122 times for Burnley in the League, scoring 38 goals, with 11 of those goals coming in the 2014/15 season in the Premier League.

 

Signing for Liverpool in the summer of 2015 as a free agent, the PFCC would ultimately order Liverpool to pay Burnley an initial compensation fee of £6.5 million.

 

Additionally, Liverpool must pay up to £1.5 million based on further appearances and also 20% of any profit they make in the event that they sell the player to another club."

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk

[Paulie Dangerously]

Is it pronounced "Solank" or "Sol-anker" 

 

Just getting my song ready

[Thoth]

It's worth refering to how the PFCC assess the compensation, and it's structure.

 

"PFCC hearings require each club to provide evidence to support their valuation of the player in question. In making its judgment the committee will take into account the costs of both clubs in operating a Football Academy or Centre of Excellence, as well as the age and playing record of the player, the length of time he was registered with his original club, the terms offered by both clubs, the status of the two clubs, the substantiated interest shown by other clubs in acquiring the registration of the player and any amounts paid by the original club to acquire the player in the first place.

 

Unlike FIFA’s formulaic approach which provides foreign clubs with a fixed tariff for compensation, this domestic process is said to provide the advantage of  allowing greater flexibility in setting the level of compensation according to the merits of each individual case.  The counter to that is that – unlike with the FIFA tariff – there is always inherent uncertainty, and this in my experience can work against players ; particularly lower down the Football League  where clubs often feel that they can not afford to carry the risk of uncertainty.  Or they may simply feel that the signing of a player governed by the PFCC regime is too complex.

 

In deciding on a compensation figure, it is not uncommon for the PFCC to set fees that build as the player becomes more established at first team level.   It has now become quite usual for clubs to receive a basic compensation fee with further payments becoming due on the player’s debut, following a certain numbers of first-team appearances and after international appearances. It is also usual for there to be a sell-on fee should the player be sold at a profit at any point in the future."

 

And also the terms of Ings compensation agreement.

 

"DANNY INGS

 

Danny Ings signed for Burnley as a 19 year old in the summer of 2011 after many years at Bournemouth.

 

It was reported that Burnley had paid a transfer fee in the region of £1 million.

 

Danny appeared 122 times for Burnley in the League, scoring 38 goals, with 11 of those goals coming in the 2014/15 season in the Premier League.

 

Signing for Liverpool in the summer of 2015 as a free agent, the PFCC would ultimately order Liverpool to pay Burnley an initial compensation fee of £6.5 million.

 

Additionally, Liverpool must pay up to £1.5 million based on further appearances and also 20% of any profit they make in the event that they sell the player to another club."

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk

At least we wont have to pay any additional fees then

[Cardie]

The question is how they handle inflation. Chelsea didn't pay anything for Solanke so consideration of a transfer fee is out of the window and Ings was more experienced than Solanke so you'd expect his fee to come in below Ings even with add ons.

 

If Chelsea could 'prove' that another club were willing to pay x amount then it could affect the value as could the increase in transfer fee's

 

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk

[Dr Nowt]

Mark Kennedy 2.0. Fuck him into the sea.

[Gym Beglin]

Would like to stop talking about money just for two fucking minutes.

 

The fans are as bad as the owners, and the owners are as bad as the fans.

 

Spending money on players isn't 'optional' when you run a football club that has a worth in the upper hundred millions.

[lifetime fan]

Couldn't give a fuck. 

[Russ Atmosphere]

Has he left yet?