Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Featured: Reds want Johnson to take paycut?


tlw content
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think it's very likely that he is earning 100k plus. Don't forget, half of that is going to be taken in tax before he even sees a penny.

 

It'd still get you quite a few toilet seats though SD.

 

I am worried though that the owners are starting to look like they know the price of everything but the value of nothing.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who 'see's the clubs side' on this....one question.

 

Who do you replace him with? Hes the best right back in the Prem for a start. Martin Kelly? Dont make me laugh, Im his biggest fan and used to know him when we was kids but he's injury prone to say the least and turned out a bit of a knob character wise I hear.

Andre? hahaha Im not even sure he's premiership material a bit Jon Ostemboresque to me thus far, lets hope not but thats all it is, hope.

 

I dont see anyone else, not in our league or anywhere else that could replace him, Daniel Alves? Make a bid and see if he will come for 50 G's.

 

Rodgers seems to know less that the journos about it (Unless he being koi) he's firmly in his plaice isnt he as I dont think he wants to lose him, it will lose him his job? All manner of  

I dont know what Henry is smokin but I want some.thorts running thru me hed.

Or perhaps some potent shit gettin passed around 'Tha Committee'.

 

Its ok, theres plenty of FSG bellwhiffers ready to q up with youtube clips under their arms to tell us there's a big demand for him to be sold and he hasnt been any good for the last 3 seasons etc,etc

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 He's the best right back in the Prem for a start.

Not so.

 

He is a very good footballer, but there are many who could do the job of specialist full back for a fraction of his wages.

 

He is a wing back, who isn't played in that position. He would be far more effective as a midfielder than as a defender where, at the highest level, he is caught out of defensive position too frequently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clyne is a pretty good full back though; I wouldn't pay Johnson anymore than 90,000 per week with his injury record and age.  His contract is up when he's 31, he's a player that relies a long on athletism, whose to say by then he will still be the brilliant player he is today.

 

 

 

If he wants a new deal, he should take a pay cut.  If he hasn't signed on reduced terms by the summer - sell him.  We'd still get about £8-10m for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's very likely that he is earning 100k plus. Don't forget, half of that is going to be taken in tax before he even sees a penny.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAlTOfl9F2w

 

The fact that someone - anyone - on that obscene amount of money gets taxed at no more than 45% is absolutely sickening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Numero Veinticinco

Probably end up selling him for about 6 million and paying double for Nathaniel Clyne because he'll accept 40k per week. These yanks are a disgrace with their obsession over the wage bill.

Yeah, 'probably'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably end up selling him for about 6 million and paying double for Nathaniel Clyne because he'll accept 40k per week. These yanks are a disgrace with their obsession over the wage bill.

 

Why pay 40k per week when we could offer to loan him and pay half his wages........?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...