Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Best Stephen King Book


Sugar Ape
 Share

Best Stephen King Book  

104 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Stephen King Book

    • Carrie
    • Salem's Lot
    • The Shining
    • The Stand
    • The Dead Zone
    • Firestarter
      0
    • Cujo
      0
    • The Running Man
      0
    • The Dark Tower Series
    • Christine
    • Pet Sematary
    • The Talisman
    • Thinner
    • It
    • Misery
    • The Tommyknockers
    • The Dark Half
    • Needful Things
    • Gerald's Game
      0
    • Dolores Claiborne
      0
    • Dreamcatcher
      0
    • The Green Mile
    • Duma Key
    • Under The Dome
    • Other - Please State


Recommended Posts

Doesn't he just have a general idea in mind of where the story is headed and just aims that way, seeing how it unfolds himself as he writes? Sure I read that somewhere.

 

Yeah, he said that in 'On Writing'. One of the funnier books I've read BTW. His inferiority complex and resentment at being tagged a 'storyteller' really comes through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah' date=' he said that in 'On Writing'. One of the funnier books I've read BTW. His inferiority complex and resentment at being tagged a 'storyteller' really comes through.[/quote']

 

I think he's a really great writer as well as storyteller. He can definitely craft a sentence and evoke an image. His characterisation is good too - especially of minor characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've no idea what that means except you disagree.

 

Those are stephen king quotes.

 

I like the tension in how he simultaneously embraces and resents the characterization.

 

And I guess, I'm just more miserly in handing out the not just "great", but "really great" writer epihtet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Those are stephen king quotes.

 

I like the tension in how he simultaneously embraces and resents the characterization.

 

And I guess' date=' I'm just more miserly in handing out the not just "great", but "really great" writer epihtet.[/quote']

 

Or maybe we just define "great" according to different criteria. I much prefer writers who can deliver pace and immersion for me than the literary ponces who win awards. Ostentatiously clever writing leaves me completely cold.

 

That's not to say I don't love some clever writers. James Elroy's prose is as crafted as anyone's but he resolutely rejects poncery.

 

For me, great writing is about the all round experience as a reader rather than simply artistic merit. I'm the same with film too. I'd take Steven Spielberg over, say, Kieslowski, any day of the week. I want to be entertained.

 

That's not to say I can't appreciate the craft of literary writers; just that their books usually bore me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or maybe we just define "great" according to different criteria. I much prefer writers who can deliver pace and immersion for me than the literary ponces who win awards. Ostentatiously clever writing leaves me completely cold.

 

That's not to say I don't love some clever writers. James Elroy's prose is as crafted as anyone's but he resolutely rejects poncery.

 

For me, great writing is about the all round experience as a reader rather than simply artistic merit. I'm the same with film too. I'd take Steven Spielberg over, say, Kieslowski, any day of the week. I want to be entertained.

 

That's not to say I can't appreciate the craft of literary writers; just that their books usually bore me.

 

Seems to me, you and Mr King share a tender spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Seems to me' date=' you and Mr King share a tender spot.[/quote']

 

Nothing tender about it. I just like what I like and also think some stuff is wildly over-praised. I much prefer literary craft in poetry rather than prose as the form far better suits the style in my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Numero Veinticinco
Or maybe we just define "great" according to different criteria. I much prefer writers who can deliver pace and immersion for me than the literary ponces who win awards. Ostentatiously clever writing leaves me completely cold.

 

That's not to say I don't love some clever writers. James Elroy's prose is as crafted as anyone's but he resolutely rejects poncery.

 

For me, great writing is about the all round experience as a reader rather than simply artistic merit. I'm the same with film too. I'd take Steven Spielberg over, say, Kieslowski, any day of the week. I want to be entertained.

 

That's not to say I can't appreciate the craft of literary writers; just that their books usually bore me.

 

I feel the same way, mate. About writing, photography, painting, music, and most other forums of art. I feel the same about TV and Film. Yes, you can learn dactylic hexameter or iambic pentameter, but does that mean I enjoy the content of what you've written? You can learn how to compose a photograph, read the light meter, adjust the f-number, but it doesn't mean the photo of your cat licking its arse is art, or that I want to look at it. Just because you put alliteration into your article, it doesn't mean your pompously pretentious pontifications interest or excite anybody. Who wants a screenplay written to a formula if it's not an interesting subject matter? There are more important components, aren't there?

 

Creativity is a much more significant ingredient. The end result of creativity coupled with passion for the project - whether the project is a song or a book or a film or a picture postcard - is way more interesting for the end-viewer than a bravura display of classical methods. Although, yuh know, that's important too. Fitting your vision into somebody else's dogmatic approach is rarely interesting to me. Creativity, originality, and a subject matter that's actually interesting. That'll do me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing tender about it. I just like what I like and also think some stuff is wildly over-praised. I much prefer literary craft in poetry rather than prose as the form far better suits the style in my view.

 

Fair enough, I don't get your idea of Literary craft because to me, done well, not for the sake of it, it enhances all forms. From poetry to advertisements. Cacophonous constructs to increase tension, varying tempo to match the action, all enrich rather than detract IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, I don't get your idea of Literary craft because to me, done well, not for the sake of it, it enhances all forms. From poetry to advertisements. Cacophonous constructs to increase tension, varying tempo to match the action, all enrich rather than detract IMO.

 

I mean when the craft is prioritised over the entertainment (for want of a better word). I don't find clever writing entertaining for its own sake. For example, Salman Rushdie's novels are beautifully crafted but fucking boring; ergo, he's a poor novelist, in my opinion. Of course I'm aware that I'm therefore not his target audience, but as we're discussing my taste that's irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably been said but the sequel to the Shining is out this year

 

Doctor Sleep. I read an extract from it (published along with an extract from his son Joe Hill's NOS4R2 in a e-short story they wrote together called In the long grass) and thought it was pretty good.

 

Here's King doing a reading from it (about 2 mins 30).

 

King doing a reading of a different section at an event:

 

[YOUTUBE]ATChLGnJLrg[/YOUTUBE]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I just finished book 4 in the Dark Tower series and I've loved them all to this point. It's the only King books I've read so I voted for that series. I've been binge reading up to this point so I needed to take a break from the series. Guess I'll have to check out The Stand at some point.

The "dear reader" at the end of book 4 is brilliant if you're looking for some insight into his own thought about his penmanship. Especially interresting is how all his other novels are somehow tied to the Dark Tower series and it's various worlds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adaptation of 'Under the Dome' starting on television soon.

 

Not a book I have read , any background to it ?

 

Really good book - supposedly really poor TV show. I'd read the book - it's about a small town that has a mysterious dome suddenly appear that cuts it off from the rest of the country - think Lord Of The Flies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...