Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should we withdraw from the Falkland Islands?  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we withdraw from the Falkland Islands?

    • Yes. The islands do not belong to us and we should leave
      33
    • No. The islands are part of the UK and should remain so forever
      72


Recommended Posts

The topic of Malvinas has reared its head again. I previously was strongly against a withdawal but I've now mellowed and can't be arsed with this shit anymore. We should leave. We only fought for these islands to get Thatcher re-elected anyway. Not a good reason for our soldiers to have died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 307
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It would make more sense for it to be independent of both nations really. But of the options offered I'd say we should stay, because the people living there see themselves as British and what they want should probably be the deciding factor. I don't know much about the politics to be honest but it just seems like a dick waving contest to me, the argies can't possibly need them for anything important - it just looks like a cold, barren place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The COLONISTS on the islands, for that is what they are, should leave and settle in mainland UK. All our previous colonists had to do the same whether they liked it or not, once we handed those countries back to the natives. I don't see why it should be any different for the falkland islanders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know the drilling has started but they haven't, err, struck oil yet. I just always assumed the war was about oil though and have associated the falklands with oil since I was a kid.

 

I also recall for some reason the British government making pledges or promises not to drill where as the argentines wanted to and that was some part of the basis for the troubles and the initial invasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The COLONISTS on the islands, for that is what they are, should leave and settle in mainland UK. All our previous colonists had to do the same whether they liked it or not, once we handed those countries back to the natives. I don't see why it should be any different for the falkland islanders.

 

There aren't any indigenous people there though like with the likes of, say, Hong Kong.

 

They were discovered, charted, and settled by the British to use as a base for the exploration of the Pacific, then became a pissing contest with the Spanish. It's not like 'we' ousted anyone and they now want to come back.

 

It's basically the argies saying they want it because it's not far from them, as far as I can tell.

 

If the Spanish had discovered the Isle of Sheppey, explored it and colonised it, I wouldn't have a problem with it still being a Spanish colony, certainly not just because it was 'by Britain'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The COLONISTS on the islands, for that is what they are, should leave and settle in mainland UK. All our previous colonists had to do the same whether they liked it or not, once we handed those countries back to the natives. I don't see why it should be any different for the falkland islanders.

 

So should the Argentinians go back to Spain/Germany or wherever aswell and hand it back to the natives?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God bless the British and there need to keep hold of things that don't belong to them!

 

(although I accept that the issue of "ownership" of the Falklands is a greatly divided one with French, Argentine, Spanish and British all claiming ownership at some point prior to 1833 and the British control and the plantation of British citizens so they could justifably call it their own a number of generations later although I thought forcing everyone to be a British citizen was a bit much, sure it didn't stop Argentina offering full Argentine citizenship themselves though - actually I dont really care)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God bless the British and there need to keep hold of things that don't belong to them!

 

 

No, God bless the right to self-determination, surely?

 

As Paul says, the people of the Falklands overwhelmingly want to remain British, so Argentina's claim to the land would appear to be tenuous at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, God bless the right to self-determination, surely?

 

As Paul says, the people of the Falklands overwhelmingly want to remain British, so Argentina's claim to the land would appear to be tenuous at best.

 

But, but, it's quite close to Argentina! Isn't that how these things work? (300 miles actually, twice the width of the Irish sea)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, but, it's quite close to Argentina! Isn't that how these things work? (300 miles actually, twice the width of the Irish sea)

 

 

Well, Argentina seems to think that's how these things work!

 

The truth is, the Falklands has never even been part of Argentina. Argentina didn't even exist when Britain took control of the Falklands. The claim to the Falklands comes about because the islands were once under the control of the former Spanish colony of the Provinces of the River Plate, which broke up and became Argentina, Uruguay and Bolivia. If we acknowledge that Argentina has any claim upon the islands, then they presumably share that claim with Uruguay and Bolivia.

 

So people who say "give them back" are somewhat mistaken. They have never been Argentina's to have back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as the majority of people living there want to be British, it should remain British. The same applies to Northern Ireland. Once the majority don't feel that way in each case we should pull out immediately and leave them to it, saving ourselves £billions in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as the majority of people living there want to be British, it should remain British. The same applies to Northern Ireland. Once the majority don't feel that way in each case we should pull out immediately and leave them to it, saving ourselves £billions in the process.

 

Aye, Scotland and Wales too while you're at it. Free prescriptions and university courses on my fucking dime. I'll take that north sea oil though, ta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, Scotland and Wales too while you're at it. Free prescriptions and university courses on my fucking dime. I'll take that north sea oil though, ta.

 

The Scots are subsidised by over £2,000 per person per annum. Since when was the North Sea on Scottish soil?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...