martin samuel, matt lipton,dave maddock

[beejay]

On 5 live this morning, the stupid cow of a presenter even managed to bring the Suarez case into a debate on the Stephen Lawrence trial basically saying that racism is still alive and well.

 

That's why we should have taken this further, it's open house on Suarez is the biggest racist in the country and Liverpool are condoning his behaviour. Every pr*ck with a fucking facebook or twitter account has taken this stand the horrible bastards and I can't fist fuck them all

[gumps]

Good OP San Don, agree completely

 

 

It's Maddock again.

A picture of Suarez and then in quotes (making it seem like a direct quote)... 'I called him a negro but i'm innocent'

 

 

 

Fuck me! Maddock has a real hard-on against us hasn't he?

 

"City Smash Kop"

 

"Liverpool demolished"

 

I know we got beat 3-0, but he must have watched a different game to me. Granted we got "demolished" by the same score in the game last year with Woy in charge, but not last nights game.

[Guest San Don]

On 5 live this morning, the stupid cow of a presenter even managed to bring the Suarez case into a debate on the Stephen Lawrence trial basically saying that racism is still alive and well.

 

That's why we should have taken this further, it's open house on Suarez is the biggest racist in the country and Liverpool are condoning his behaviour. Every pr*ck with a fucking facebook or twitter account has taken this stand the horrible bastards and I can't fist fuck them all

 

Cant say Im surprised some imbeciles in the meedja would link Suarez to the Lawrence crime. Guess Im only surprised they didnt link him directly to the fucking crime scene.

 

Buch of shitbags.

Edited January 4, 2012 by San Don
changed 'like' to 'link'

[Randy Marsh]

Good OP San Don, agree completely

 

 

 

 

 

Fuck me! Maddock has a real hard-on against us hasn't he?

 

"City Smash Kop"

 

"Liverpool demolished"

 

I know we got beat 3-0, but he must have watched a different game to me. Granted we got "demolished" by the same score in the game last year with Woy in charge, but not last nights game.

 

I don't doubt that he is a massive ballbag but in his defence he'll have no say in the headlines or sub headlines on the page.

[Guest San Don]

I don't doubt that he is a massive ballbag but in his defence he'll have no say in the headlines or sub headlines on the page.

 

well he could threaten to resign if he's been misrepresented. Oh, wait..........

[TheDrowningMan]

well he could threaten to resign if he's been misrepresented. Oh, wait..........

 

Indeed.

 

That argument holds even less sway than the suggestion that The Sun is staffed by entirely different people nowadays so perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to....(you know the rest).

[LFC64]

On 5 live this morning, the stupid cow of a presenter even managed to bring the Suarez case into a debate on the Stephen Lawrence trial basically saying that racism is still alive and well.

 

That's why we should have taken this further, it's open house on Suarez is the biggest racist in the country and Liverpool are condoning his behaviour. Every pr*ck with a fucking facebook or twitter account has taken this stand the horrible bastards and I can't fist fuck them all

 

Exactly. Suarez ends up synonomous with the issue of racism. How unprofessional have you got to be to make such a lazy link and not stop to think if it is a tad inappropriate? Not surprised though with the standard of journalism we have these days. Dumbing down indeed.

[Randy Marsh]

well he could threaten to resign if he's been misrepresented. Oh, wait..........

 

I wasn't defending the tit, merely pointing it out.

[Guest San Don]

I wasn't defending the tit, merely pointing it out.

 

And I wasnt suggesting you were.

 

I was just pointing out a course of action he could take if he considers his 'article' has been misrepresented.

[stmichael]

the press can all fuck themselves. check out this drivel from the sunday supplement at the weekend on the suarez case. paul smith in particular is a horrible arrogant twat.

 

SkySports Video Player (v09) freewheel live

[piscinin]

Sorry, but if you read articles by those tits you are more stupid than they are. The only power you have over them is to not click on their articles and not buy their papers. Exercise that power.

[LFC64]

Sorry, but if you read articles by those tits you are more stupid than they are. The only power you have over them is to not click on their articles and not buy their papers. Exercise that power.

 

Agree entirely!

[Guest San Don]

Sorry, but if you read articles by those tits you are more stupid than they are. The only power you have over them is to not click on their articles and not buy their papers. Exercise that power.

 

Well if the whole fucking article is reproduced and jpegged on here........

[fowler9]

surely its not legal to put quote marks on something he hasn't said?

[piscinin]

Well if the whole fucking article is reproduced and jpegged on here........

 

Don't fucking read it. It's not hard. You know it's fiction anyway. It's in the english press after all.

[Unrighteous]

The group of them should go suck the remnants of a fuck from a dead man's asshole.

[Unrighteous]

I can't fist fuck them all

 

 

Adorn the proper attire, and you might be able to:

[Cliff T. Beast]

The English media are vile, we know this. Holt, Barclay, Samuel. All of them are disgusting wastes of skin.

 

Best thing to do is not to read the shite they print. I think the vast majority of people on here are clued up enough to see through their agendas. We just sing his name loud and proud every game and even louder when he comes back.

 

I think Kenny's next presser will be interesting

[navbasi]

I don't doubt that he is a massive ballbag but in his defence he'll have no say in the headlines or sub headlines on the page.

 

The headlines are apparently approved by Oliver Holt.

[piscinin]

Well if the whole fucking article is reproduced and jpegged on here........

 

You're pathetic, effete neg was so weak my rep increased. Cheers bud.

[Russ Atmosphere]

The English media are vile, we know this. Holt, Barclay, Samuel.

 

The thing is, because of who they tap information off and who they ghostwrite for, there's barely an independent journalist out there.

 

 

[beejay]

Adorn the proper attire, and you might be able to:

 

OK listen up all you facebook/twitter Suarez-haters, we can do this the easy way and you retract your asinine comments or we can do it the hard way....(putting on gloves)

[ozted]

I reproduce two e-mails I sent to the Daily Mirror before Chrimbo when the Suarez 'verdict' first broke. The first was to their Mailbox - never published; the second to Oliver Holt - never acknowledged.

 

To Mirror Mailbox:

 

 

' I was disgusted by the 'RACIST' headline over David Maddock's article on Luis Suarez's suspension and which was repeated over the rest of his article on Page 62.

Before you accuse me of condoning racism, the Commission found him guilty of using racist taunts on the say-so of the so called victim. The Commission also concluded that Suarez was NOT a racist. Nowhere in the articles by David Maddock, Martin Lipton or Oliver Holt was this FACT mentioned. That is selective reporting at its worst.

 

Who is David Maddock and the Daily Mirror to ignore this finding of the Commission and to arbitrarily label Suarez a Racist for the rest of his career?'

 

 

To Oliver Holt:

 

'I found the headline RACIST over the start of David Maddock's article on the back page of yesterday's Mirror disgusting. I turned to page 62 and found the same banner headline over the rest of his article. Before you shout down from your sanctimonious high horse that I am yet another one condoning racism, let me remind you that the Commission said they did not believe Suarez was a racist.

 

Who does Maddock and the Mirror think they areto scream he IS a racist and by so doing pin this label on him probably for the rest of his career? This finding of the Commisson was also conveniently ignored in your article and in the one by Martin Lipton in yesterday's paper. Nice bit of selective reporting all round.

 

I see in this morning's Mirror (unfortunately my wife still buys it) that you have a dig at '....many [who] have already put Club loyalty first and ignored what is right or wrong'. Ignoring the accuracy of that statement you are presumably getting at Liverpool FC, Kenny Dalglish and Liverpool Supporters. What would you have them do? Hang him?; put him on the transfer list?(There would be plenty of clubs queuing for that); banish him back to Uruguay?; have a captains armband made but with RACIST written on it.; employ him on the car park at Melwood?;....but all the time to be carrying a handbell and chanting 'RACIST'.

 

Come on, at the moment you seem to be occupying the top of the moral high dung heap that is British journalism; what do YOU think Liverpool FC, Kenny Dalglish and Liverpool supporters should do to this man?. Let your readers know rather than this holier than thou sniping at what others (without having the guts to name them) are doing and saying'.

 

 

The trouble with these bastards is that, like politicians, they spout so much shit that they eventually start to believe themselves. The only thing to do is ensure their future visits to Anfield are made as uncomfortable as possible.

[Guest TK-421]

Like turn the heating up in the summer?

[beejay]

I reproduce two e-mails I sent to the Daily Mirror before Chrimbo when the Suarez 'verdict' first broke. The first was to their Mailbox - never published; the second to Oliver Holt - never acknowledged.

 

To Mirror Mailbox:

 

 

' I was disgusted by the 'RACIST' headline over David Maddock's article on Luis Suarez's suspension and which was repeated over the rest of his article on Page 62.

Before you accuse me of condoning racism, the Commission found him guilty of using racist taunts on the say-so of the so called victim. The Commission also concluded that Suarez was NOT a racist. Nowhere in the articles by David Maddock, Martin Lipton or Oliver Holt was this FACT mentioned. That is selective reporting at its worst.

 

Who is David Maddock and the Daily Mirror to ignore this finding of the Commission and to arbitrarily label Suarez a Racist for the rest of his career?'

 

 

To Oliver Holt:

 

'I found the headline RACIST over the start of David Maddock's article on the back page of yesterday's Mirror disgusting. I turned to page 62 and found the same banner headline over the rest of his article. Before you shout down from your sanctimonious high horse that I am yet another one condoning racism, let me remind you that the Commission said they did not believe Suarez was a racist.

 

Who does Maddock and the Mirror think they areto scream he IS a racist and by so doing pin this label on him probably for the rest of his career? This finding of the Commisson was also conveniently ignored in your article and in the one by Martin Lipton in yesterday's paper. Nice bit of selective reporting all round.

 

I see in this morning's Mirror (unfortunately my wife still buys it) that you have a dig at '....many [who] have already put Club loyalty first and ignored what is right or wrong'. Ignoring the accuracy of that statement you are presumably getting at Liverpool FC, Kenny Dalglish and Liverpool Supporters. What would you have them do? Hang him?; put him on the transfer list?(There would be plenty of clubs queuing for that); banish him back to Uruguay?; have a captains armband made but with RACIST written on it.; employ him on the car park at Melwood?;....but all the time to be carrying a handbell and chanting 'RACIST'.

 

Come on, at the moment you seem to be occupying the top of the moral high dung heap that is British journalism; what do YOU think Liverpool FC, Kenny Dalglish and Liverpool supporters should do to this man?. Let your readers know rather than this holier than thou sniping at what others (without having the guts to name them) are doing and saying'.

 

 

The trouble with these bastards is that, like politicians, they spout so much shit that they eventually start to believe themselves. The only thing to do is ensure their future visits to Anfield are made as uncomfortable as possible.

 

Nice try mate.

 

I think it is worth sending in replies, mostly it's water off a duck's ass but some of these journos have surprisingly thin skins and like to believe that their always in the right.