CELEBRITY SEX PESTS

[Barrington Womble]

53 minutes ago, Babb'sBurstNad said:

 

It's all a bit odd. I mean, who pays £35k in an era of free porn and Only Fans?

 

Wouldn't be surprised if when the SEX PEST is finally outed they go to a rival paper and claim they were blackmailed.

 

Seems it wasn't 35k in one hit, it was over a period of time. Depending what the pics are, that could be a bit different to only fans and your pornhub type stuff. 

 

41 minutes ago, Denny Crane said:

 

Another take is -  the BBC said new information came to light in the last few days, quite likely the mother might not have even have known it was illegal and a possible police matter.

 

Wise not to call the bizzies in if your child has a sizable habit and it would more than likely damage the relationship with her child. It looks like this was reported at the time ITV and Schofield were all over the news. 

BBC got a dosier off the family last week they said on breakfast this morning. And the presenter called the victim. 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

I'll be honest I can't think of any man I'd pay 35k to see their ring piece for, particularly as highlighted I could source it for free.

[Denny Crane]

16 minutes ago, Barrington Womble said:

 

Seems it wasn't 35k in one hit, it was over a period of time. Depending what the pics are, that could be a bit different to only fans and your pornhub type stuff. 

 

BBC got a dosier off the family last week they said on breakfast this morning. And the presenter called the victim. 

 

The BBC said they received new information in a statement last week, I think Friday so that ties in. The mother originally contacted them May 19th.

[Redder Lurtz]

Welsh bloke innit. 

[TD_LFC]

1 hour ago, Barrington Womble said:

So is it now confirmed the victim is male? 

 

I think a couple of news reports have accidently mentioned a him, I've just carried it over but have no idea if it actually is or not.

[skend04]

I was going to ask if the photos the BBC presenter bought were worth £35k and then realised the rabbit hole that that particular question takes this thread down is really dark.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sketches will suffice.

[Ezekiel 25:17]

6 minutes ago, skend04 said:

I was going to ask if the photos the BBC presenter bought were worth £35k and then realised the rabbit hole that that particular question takes this thread down is really dark.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sketches will suffice.

Of course they weren't  it was some nobody young lad, not RB14.

[Barrington Womble]

30 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

 

I think a couple of news reports have accidently mentioned a him, I've just carried it over but have no idea if it actually is or not.

 

Someone on kuntsberg also slipped up it was someone in BBC news. Which fits in with the Welsh bloke I suppose. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Make it so.

[redrosetints]

8 hours ago, halewood pete said:

See Osbourne thread …

[TheBitch]

53 minutes ago, Ezekiel 25:17 said:

Of course they weren't  it was some nobody young lad, not RB14.

Do it properly, Zeke. 
 

@rb14

[TheBitch]

[Section_31]

1 hour ago, Ezekiel 25:17 said:

I'll be honest I can't think of any man I'd pay 35k to see their ring piece for, particularly as highlighted I could source it for free.

 

One ring to rule them all. 

[Babb'sBurstNad]

1 hour ago, Redder Lurtz said:

Welsh bloke innit. 

 

Plaid Bymru

[Strontium]

The whole thing feels like a bit of a set-up, you might even say it was a ring sting

 

 

 

 

thanks I'm here all week

[Section_31]

Just now, Babb'sBurstNad said:

 

Plaid Bymru

 

Spaffy taffy. 

[Curly]

13 minutes ago, TheBitch said:

 

[Pete]

I'm a bit confused by all this.  It's legal to have sex at 16 but it's illegal to source pics of under 18's (don't mean little kids as that's twisted)  in states of undress/explicitly posed?  Is this correct? 

[Denny Crane]

7 minutes ago, Pete said:

I'm a bit confused by all this.  It's legal to have sex at 16 but it's illegal to source pics of under 18's (don't mean little kids as that's twisted)  in states of undress/explicitly posed?  Is this correct? 

 

Yes but there is a caveat. If you are in a relationship with the said 16-18 year old then you can take pics as long as you don't distribute. 

[lifetime fan]

2 hours ago, redheart said:

Kay Burley "accidentally" confirmed that the teenager was  male.

 

It narrows the field. 

Think it was Priti Patel who first let that slip. 
 

The same Priti Patel that used to be Home Secretary for fucks sake. 

[clangers]

Whoever it is really needs to learn that the internet is full of free porn rather than spunking 35k on a one to one webcam with a 17 year old....apparently.

[Gnasher]

9 minutes ago, clangers said:

Whoever it is really needs to learn that the internet is full of free porn rather than spunking 35k on a one to one webcam with a 17 year old....apparently.

 

Yeah but we haven't cottoned on to the Internet in Wales yet. Bit behind the times.

[Jairzinho]

Classic huwdunnit, this.

[Guest]

3 hours ago, Gnasher said:

 

Welsh newsreader?

Huw Edwards?

[Gnasher]

3 minutes ago, Shooter in the Motor said:

Huw Edwards?

 

Not sure if I can say.