Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Man City - the new bitters?


Naz17
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, dockers_strike said:

The fans are just a bunch of self entitled moaning twats. The club is owned by a fucking bunch who demand absolute rule in their own country. This is why they are always firing off letters to the football authorities (and Merseyside Police) saying why is this happening, how has no one been arrested etc, etc.

 

Upholders of 'sporting integrity'? Dont make me laugh.

They'll be demanding Klopp and co to be stoned to death when we win the league. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, JagSquared said:

Couldn’t decide whether to put this on the Everton thread (as it has that taxi driver vibe or on here, I reckon it’s city fans as they have lost it). Anyway I’ve Had this on WhatsApp it’s genuinely hilarious. 

 

From a mate of mine (he’s not a footy fan so no bias expected):

City and Chelsea have lodged legal appeals asking for clarification showing various pieces of footage and asking what is going on with Liverpool getting a bias in decisions. Accusations are being made that Richard scudamore wants Liverpool to win the league to spice things up. Apparently a fair few pundits and ex players are aware of it all (think John Leslie the rapist) so it will be a matter of time before it comes out.

Theres whispers a relegated team will sue PGMOL and that will topple the stack of cards“

not sure why they picked John Leslie as an example. I thought our heads were supposed to fall off but it seems everyone else’s has instead.

 

giphy (10).gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Leyton388 said:

This is what 30 plus years of fume and piss taking out of liverpool have done. 30 years with Liverpool looking to finally end our title drought and people cant handle it and are losing their mind. 

In a nutshell. Can give it, can’t take it, need to construct all manner of amusing moral high ground contortions to justify that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Leyton388 said:

This is what 30 plus years of fume and piss taking out of liverpool have done. 30 years with Liverpool looking to finally end our title drought and people cant handle it and are losing their mind. 


In a nutshell.

 

Looking forward to this legal challenge that hasn’t happened. And still none of them can explain WHY the Powers would want us to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folie à deux, shared psychosis,[2] or shared delusional disorder is a psychiatric syndrome in which symptoms of a delusional belief and sometimes hallucinations[3][4] are transmitted from one individual to another.[5] The same syndrome shared by more than two people may be called folie à trois, folie à quatre, folie en famille ("family madness"), or even folie à plusieurs ("madness of several").

 

Recent psychiatric classifications refer to the syndrome as shared psychotic disorder(DSM-IV – 297.3) and induced delusional disorder (F24) in the ICD-10, although the research literature largely uses the original name. This disorder is not in the current DSM (DSM-5). The disorder was first conceptualized in 19th-century French psychiatry by Charles Lasègue and Jean-Pierre Falret and is also known as Lasègue-Falret syndrome.[3][6] The term is from French for "madness of two".

 

This syndrome is most commonly diagnosed when the two or more individuals concerned live in proximity and may be socially or physically isolated and have little interaction with other people. Various sub-classifications of folie à deux have been proposed to describe how the delusional belief comes to be held by more than one person: 


Folie imposée is where a dominant person (known as the 'primary', 'inducer' or 'principal') initially forms a delusional belief during a psychotic episode and imposes it on another person or persons (known as the 'secondary', 'acceptor' or 'associate') with the assumption that the secondary person might not have become deluded if left to his or her own devices. If the parties are admitted to hospital separately, then the delusions in the person with the induced beliefs usually resolve without the need of medication.

 

Folie simultanée describes either the situation where two people considered

to suffer independently from psychosis influence the content of each other's delusions so they become identical or strikingly similar, or one in which two people "morbidly predisposed" to delusional psychosis mutually trigger symptoms in each other.[7]
 

Folie à deux and its more populous cousins are in many ways a psychiatric curiosity. The current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders states that a person cannot be diagnosed as being delusional if the belief in question is one "ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture" (see entry for delusion). It is not clear at what point a belief considered to be delusional escapes from the folie à... diagnostic category and becomes legitimate because of the number of people holding it. When a large number of people may come to believe obviously false and potentially distressing things based purely on hearsay, these beliefs are not considered to be clinical delusions by the psychiatric profession and are labelled instead as mass hysteria.

 

As with most psychological disorders, the extent and type of delusion varies, however it usually mimics the delusion of the inducer and is almost very similar to it.[8] The inducer does not realize that they are making the other person sick but instead think they are helping by alerting the second person of what they deem to be "truth".

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_à_deux

 

 

 

Its now very definitely in mass hysteria territory.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a Birmingham fan over there that wants city to win, but is telling them to scale back on the ridiculous conspiracy theories, and they have no interest in listening to him/her, and plough right on with it. It's like fucking infowars, the hilariously stupid cunts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Barry Wom said:

I seem to remember the settlement did not include any admission of hacking. As for the coach attack, they need to stop Fu king crying about that. Did they lose to wolves because of it? It happens the world over, I don't agree with it myself, but it's not unusual. And cheating for 2 years, is that in relation to the fact they're all dickhead like their boneheaded manager? 

Everybody was Fu King fighting dedededede de dede

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Horus said:

There's a Birmingham fan over there that wants city to win, but is telling them to scale back on the ridiculous conspiracy theories, and they have no interest in listening to him/her, and plough right on with it. It's like fucking infowars, the hilariously stupid cunts.

To be fair, I wouldn't pay any attention to a Birmingham fan on anything either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are City fans constantly invoking the "bus attack" as a reason to have no respect for Liverpool as a football outfit when there is footage of their fans attacking the Manchester United bus in a virtually identical fashion? If they're being logical, surely they should therefore have no respect for themselves?

 

EDIT: this post is also a handy guide to the correct usage of there/their/they're, for any City fans reading

  • Upvote 10
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...