Horus

It was a compliment. Must be tough to manufacture insults from a bit of dry sarcasm, though. Thoughts and prayers.

Well you know best

I don't even think that would change anything. It's not like it would have rules in place like FFP, so although we'd definitely have more cash, so would everyone else, and they've got owners far more likely to allow said cash to be way over spent. Then because we have all the extra cash, buying players from non-SL clubs would be like our current English player tax, on every player in the world.

Saudi's have been busy changing all their info with companies house. NCUK also changed

Newcastle takeover looks as though it's about to go through. There's the 4 CL spots taken up in about 3-5 years.

Looks to me like the club were looking to give themselves cover briefing that no CL footie meant no money, when things were looking bleak. We turned things around and Pearce maybe just jumped to the logical conclusion that CL meant money, but I think they were just using that bad run for their own benefit.

It was FSG reverse psychology. If we'd have finished 5th, we'd have been lining up with Mbappe and Sancho, but because we finished 3rd they were taken off the table.

We can't really bank on Gomez and Matip remaining fit, so this is actually a common sense move.

Look, man, signings just ain't for us.

We're keeping our powder dry for a big summer.

Since winning the CL (according to this list), we have a net spend of £20m more than the ronaldos U18's. Go reds.

As it's on the echo site and they've put a quote in the article, I'd guess it's probably a case of the "inside source told us..."

Seems like a divide and conquer approach to rile up both sides of the fsg debate, to keep us fighting amongst ourselves and leave the focus away from the ownership.

Renato Sanches off to wolves on loan, so looking like the ronaldos will pick up neves.

The no value in January thread, I think you mean.