Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?

[torahboy]

13 hours ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

He's posting in support of her. Hence, one of her supporters. 

 

Anyone else who negs me for highlighting racism will get one back too. I won't be bullied into silence.

No disproportionate response, Bibi. Keep it limited and targeted.

[Pureblood]

13 hours ago, Nelly-Torres said:

Is Rico still being a racist? I'm glad I've filtered out his hatred via the ignore function. 

I get a daily buzz from ignoring his racist views.  100% pure adrenalin.  

[cloggypop]

22 minutes ago, TK421 said:

I get a daily buzz from ignoring his racist views.  100% pure adrenalin.  

I prefer to call it no platforming. 

[Red Phoenix]

He's been ratioed on twitter for this (more comments than retweets, usually means user is getting shit for what they tweeted.) Probably because Sturgeon commented on it and set the Scots on him, haha.

 

 

[Stickman]

47 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

He's been ratioed on twitter for this (more comments than retweets, usually means user is getting shit for what they tweeted.) Probably because Sturgeon commented on it and set the Scots on him, haha.

 

 

 

 

I guess if they're not jumping into bed with Tories then lying war mongers will do....

 

 

 

[Rico1304]

2 hours ago, TK421 said:

I get a daily buzz from ignoring his racist views.  100% pure adrenalin.  

Rent free you flouncing cunt 

[Numero Veinticinco]

16 hours ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

He's posting in support of her. Hence, one of her supporters. 

 

Anyone else who negs me for highlighting racism will get one back too. I won't be bullied into silence.

In what way is negging ‘bullying’ and are you a bully when you happen to neg somebody first or is it just those negging you? Also, in what way does negging silence somebody? It has no impact upon what you can post, where you can post it, or whether your post is displayed. 

 

It’s a red thumb icon. 

[Numero Veinticinco]

16 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

Are you still punching your wife? 

@Nelly-Torres

 

Did I miss something or is he just being randomly nasty with that comment?

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

8 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

@Nelly-Torres

 

Did I miss something or is he just being randomly nasty with that comment?

I've got 87 convictions for domestic violence. 

 

Or, maybe it's your latter suggestion? Yeah, it's your latter suggestion. Pops is on a random one again. 

 

That's paedophilia AND domestic violence he's falsely, and without substance, accused people of now. The shit troll. 

[Numero Veinticinco]

1 minute ago, Nelly-Torres said:

I've got 87 convictions for domestic violence. 

 

Or, maybe it's your latter suggestion? Yeah, it's your latter suggestion. Pops is on a random one again. 

I didn’t know if it was a running gag or something, because that’s a particularly spiteful thing to say. 

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I didn’t know if it was a running gag or something, because that’s a particularly spiteful thing to say. 

Children do such things. Not to worry. 

[Numero Veinticinco]

3 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

I've got 87 convictions for domestic violence. 

[Mook]

2 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

He's been ratioed on twitter for this (more comments than retweets, usually means user is getting shit for what they tweeted.) Probably because Sturgeon commented on it and set the Scots on him, haha.

 

 

It was a bit of a stupid Tweet really, Labour are enough of a joke up here without tweeting stuff like that in the middle of a huge national (UK) crisis. He could win some Scottish voters back by backing the remain campaign but he's acting like he's more interested in something that happened 40 years ago there.

 

Pathetic really & Sturgeon isn't much better.

 

Honestly, this must be the worst tory government in history & the people opposing them might as well not be there. I'd put my mortgage on the horrible cunts winning the next general election.

[Strontium]

1 hour ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

@Nelly-Torres

 

Did I miss something or is he just being randomly nasty with that comment?

 

You must be familiar with the "When did you stop beating your wife?" idiom, surely.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

[Strontium]

39 minutes ago, Mook said:

It was a bit of a stupid Tweet really, Labour are enough of a joke up here without tweeting stuff like that in the middle of a huge national (UK) crisis. He could win some Scottish voters back by backing the remain campaign but he's acting like he's more interested in something that happened 40 years ago there.

 

Who is interested in the future of the country when there are 40 year old scores to settle, eh?

[sir roger]

I assumed he was getting at the fact that the SNP didn't back the Labour proposal last night after he caused himself internal issues going beyond policy on other indicative votes they were keen on.

[Mook]

4 minutes ago, sir roger said:

I assumed he was getting at the fact that the SNP didn't back the Labour proposal last night after he caused himself internal issues going beyond policy on other indicative votes they were keen on.

Sounds like something a woman would do in the middle of a row, cast up something from 40 years ago rather than try to sort the current problem out.

[aRdja]

Just now, Mook said:

Sounds like something a woman would do in the middle of a row, cast up something from 40 years ago rather than try to sort the current problem out.

Tbf, I do that on a regular basis.

[sir roger]

I would assume all the parties will be concentrating on & discussing the likely 3 top ' nearest to success ' indicative votes that will probably get a second go on Monday , but I can't see it is bad politics to point out that the SNP would not show indicative support for a plan which seems to be far better than most on offer for their country.

 

You are up in Scotland , Mook , any idea why they couldn't support it ?

 

Is it a new vote or nothing , now ?

[Anubis]

I think Sturgeon has just hinted they may support it if it's brought back on Monday in Scottish First Minister's Questions, after it was pointed out it was one of the SNP had been promoting throughout the process.

[Rico1304]

1 hour ago, Nelly-Torres said:

I've got 87 convictions for domestic violence. 

 

Or, maybe it's your latter suggestion? Yeah, it's your latter suggestion. Pops is on a random one again. 

 

That's paedophilia AND domestic violence he's falsely, and without substance, accused people of now. The shit troll. 

Come on, even I heard of the loaded question fallacy.  Keep up you stupid boy. 

 

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/loadques.html

[Numero Veinticinco]

46 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

You must be familiar with the "When did you stop beating your wife?" idiom, surely.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

I know what a loaded question is, of course. Now, back to the subject at hand.  It isn’t comparable because, unlike Nelly who hasn’t shown any signs of being a wife beater, Rico has both shown himself to be extremely predjudicial to an entire group of people based on nothing more than their racial and cultural identity, and defended deplorable racism and that has both been shown multiple times upon request and I’m more than happy to do it every time it is asked of me by the man himself. 

[Mook]

13 minutes ago, sir roger said:

I would assume all the parties will be concentrating on & discussing the likely 3 top ' nearest to success ' indicative votes that will probably get a second go on Monday , but I can't see it is bad politics to point out that the SNP would not show indicative support for a plan which seems to be far better than most on offer for their country.

 

You are up in Scotland , Mook , any idea why they couldn't support it ?

 

Is it a new vote or nothing , now ?

What's the Labour plan they're not supporting?

 

Sorry, I've not been keeping up. I Googled it but there's nothing jumping out at me.

[Numero Veinticinco]

2 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

In what way is negging ‘bullying’ and are you a bully when you happen to neg somebody first or is it just those negging you? Also, in what way does negging silence somebody? It has no impact upon what you can post, where you can post it, or whether your post is displayed. 

 

It’s a red thumb icon. 

@Strontium Dog

[Red Phoenix]

2 hours ago, Mook said:

It was a bit of a stupid Tweet really, Labour are enough of a joke up here without tweeting stuff like that in the middle of a huge national (UK) crisis. He could win some Scottish voters back by backing the remain campaign but he's acting like he's more interested in something that happened 40 years ago there.

 

Pathetic really & Sturgeon isn't much better.

 

Didn't agree with it either, don't think they should be arguing on twitter at a time like this.

 

As for what they're not supporting, this doesn't mention the option they passed on but gives their reason for voting like they did, from Guardian live section :

 

Quote

But Sturgeon insisted that her reasoning was that, with options to remain among the amendments, “stopping Brexit altogether must be our top priority”. She added that the option of staying in the single market and customs union was not on the ballot paper last night.

 

Her spokesperson later said that the first minister’s position was that “remain appears to be very much in play”, that there was nothing on last night’s ballot that met the full continued single market/customs union arrangement put forward as a compromise by the Scottish government in 2016, but that the SNP has “not abandoned the potential for compromise”.

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2019/mar/28/brexit-latest-news-live-no-deal-on-12-april-most-likely-unless-mps-back-mays-deal-or-alternative-says-letwin-politics-live?page=with:block-5c9cda50e4b0b4d18bde1d07#block-5c9cda50e4b0b4d18bde1d07