Nelly-Torres

You can't read. Classic. Ha ha. Perfect. Just perfect. Consistency.

Plus, it's disappointing to know she's a trolling, bullying cunt as she was quite fit in Toast Of London.

Nobody accused them of grooming. Well, not in the article that apparently forms the basis for the legal threats. Offering to talk through your differences is fine. Sending loads of tweets to a person who'd asked to be left alone isn't fine. It was ridiculous and people were right to call out the troll for her behaviour. She knew full well what she was doing.

It would appear to link to an article by Shaun Lawson, when Oberman sent about 60 tweets to a 16 year old girl with anxiety issues who asked to be left alone. The solicitor is tweeting loads of people who have shared that article and threatening them with legal action.

And, I see that Rachel Riley and Oberman are threatening a 17 year old girl on Twitter this time, via their solicitor, threatening legal action. Because that's how you carry out pre-action protocol shit, not your standard letter before action, but do it all on Twitter. Because you don't foresee that your blind followers will pile on and harass ANOTHER young woman. Utter scumbags.

Ian Austin is meant to be off, putting the Lib Dems down into fourth place. He has a 22 seat majority. Obviously, there'll be no by-election.

Malaysian asylum seeker. Claim based on his alleged homosexuality. His name is Yew Fook Sam. It's Echo gone Daily Mash. https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/man-whos-not-gay-enough-15857543

Fair points. But, what should the final action be for Hatton and other such members, who may have no other infractions against them? There seems to be no leeway when it comes to clumsy is it/isn't antisemitism, whereas all other forms of discrimination seem to be brushed off with an I was misspoken/sorry if I caused offence/I've come to recognise that my language wasn't appropriate non-apology. As the lines are often blurred, as even acknowledged by the "might be" terminology of the IHRA definition, should it not be enough in cases like Hatton's etc for an apology, a formal warning and some sort of educational programme. For me, that'd be a better solution to help solve the problem of antisemitism, as the current approach still has hints of don't criticise Israel or that's it about it. Save the sterner punishments for the horrible, more clear cut cases and systematic, repeat offenders.

You're pathetically boring. Cunt.

Also, does the IHRA definition depart from the usually accepted rules of justice, particularly that legislation etc shouldn't have retrospective effect? Whether we agree that Hatton's tweet was antisemitic (or not), it was posted in 2012 and the IHRA definition of antisemitism was not adopted by the UK until 2016, or by Labour until 2018.

Ah, it looks like Hatton wasn't a Labour member after all. He'd passed the first stage of the process - panel approval. But, failed the next stage, final approval by the NEC.

This gif feels particularly relevant tonight...

I like his hats.

Poor Derek. It looks like he's fell foul of the don't criticise Israel rule. We need to take a stand against this overly sensitive murderous rogue state.

I'm not as well practiced in the arts of trolling as you. Anyway, this is boring. I'm off to have a look at my sizeable bank balance. In a bit, Enoch.