Keir Starmer

[Numero Veinticinco]

1 minute ago, Gnasher said:

So not the poor people who can only afford to buy the cheaper cuts of meat because its all they can afford to feed their family?

Yeah, Skend, you haslet enabler. 

[Gnasher]

44 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Why are you so upset? You replied with a yawn. Then 40 minutes later in a rage, back again, then again 25 minutes later. Dry your eyes. 

God they're like a sect, they've started to bounce off each other. Insufferable.

[Numero Veinticinco]

1 minute ago, Gnasher said:

God they're like a sect. Insufferable.

Cult*

[Jack the Sipper]

4 hours ago, Gnasher said:

Another strange case of Desperate feeling the coins click.

 

 

 

Whisper it gently but he's 100% correct. Energy companies should really be given fuvk all. Lucky not to be in jail.

 

Dan 'Man of the People' Hodges, the card-carrying socialist when it comes to criticising a Labour proposal that, whisper it quietly, the majority of Tories think is a good idea. Just like you, he would rather see a Truss-led Tory government than a Labour one led by Starmer. 

 

Did you think he was 100% correct when he spent years going after Corbyn at every opportunity and called for Starmer to kick him out the Party, or is it only now he's going after his successor that you agree with him?

 

For what it's worth, I thought he was a Tory cunt whose stated views aren't worth a toss then, just as I think he's a Tory cunt whose stated views aren't worth a toss now. Consistency.

[Numero Veinticinco]

2 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

Dan 'Man of the People' Hodges, the card-carrying socialist when it comes to criticising a Labour proposal that, whisper it quietly, the majority of Tories think is a good idea. Just like you, he would rather see a Truss-led Tory government than a Labour one led by Starmer. 

 

Did you think he was 100% correct when he spent years going after Corbyn at every opportunity and called for Starmer to kick him out the Party, or is it only now he's going after his successor that you agree with him?

 

For what it's worth, I thought he was a Tory cunt whose stated views aren't worth a toss then, just as I think he's a Tory cunt whose stated views aren't worth a toss now. Consistency.

I’m blocked by him. Such a shame. 

[Jack the Sipper]

13 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I’m blocked by him. Such a shame. 

 

It's no big loss. Pretty much everything he posts on any political topic is centred around the fact that Starmer kicked his leader out of the Labour Party. Once you realise that he becomes very boring and predictable.

 

 

[Gnasher]

8 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

It's no big loss. Pretty much everything he posts on any political topic is centred around the fact that Starmer kicked his leader out of the Labour Party. Once you realise that he becomes very boring and predictable.

 

 

Not a cult. Not a bunch of cunts.

[Numero Veinticinco]

12 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

It's no big loss. Pretty much everything he posts on any political topic is centred around the fact that Starmer kicked his leader out of the Labour Party. Once you realise that he becomes very boring and predictable.

 

 

I was talking about the cunt Gnasher was quoting, mate. Funny really, because Gnasher was banging on about how James O'B is a cunt for voting for Johnson for Mayor 15 years ago, but is happy to cite Dan Hodges. In short, Gnasher is a whopper. 

[Jack the Sipper]

13 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I was talking about the cunt Gnasher was quoting, mate. Funny really, because Gnasher was banging on about how James O'B is a cunt for voting for Johnson for Mayor 15 years ago, but is happy to cite Dan Hodges. In short, Gnasher is a whopper. 

 

Hodges? Join the cult. A few years ago he retweeted some right-wing wanker, think it was Philip Davies MP, who was banging on about (from memory) the "Guardian-reading, smashed avocado-eating, north London liberal elite". I posted underneath "Dan, you do realise he's talking about your mum?" Didn't last long after that.

[Skidfingers McGonical]

4 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

Can I see your workings out? 

Might want to ask the leading economists rather than Anubis.

[Gnasher]

16 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

Hodges? Join the cult. A few years ago he retweeted some right-wing wanker, think it was Philip Davies MP, who was banging on about (from memory) the "Guardian-reading, smashed avocado-eating, north London liberal elite". I posted underneath "Dan, you do realise he's talking about your mum?" Didn't last long after that.

God you're an insufferable cunt.

[Gnasher]

30 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I was talking about the cunt Gnasher was quoting, mate. Funny really, because Gnasher was banging on about how James O'B is a cunt for voting for Johnson for Mayor 15 years ago, but is happy to cite Dan Hodges. In short, Gnasher is a whopper. 

God you're another insufferable cunt.

[Gnasher]

Its strange how people who know things that should belong to us complain when people say can we have these things that belong to us back. 

 

Unless of course they've got shares on the other side, skin in the game as they might say.

[Gnasher]

Spot on. Time to end this nonsense.

 

 

[Numero Veinticinco]

15 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Spot on. Time to end this nonsense.

 

 

Can’t you just reply to him on Twitter? Yeah, we know we should but it’s not going to happen with it being *cough* slid in the back door. And we ain’t getting it for nothing either. 

[Gnasher]

4 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Can’t you just reply to him on Twitter? Yeah, we know we should but it’s not going to happen with it being *cough* slid in the back door. And we ain’t getting it for nothing either. 

Why the fuvk shouldn't the opinions of someone like Maguire be shown on here? 

 

Because his opinions do not match yours so you not only attack the messenger but attack the platform. I'll post what I see fit. If you don't like it fuck off or put me on ignore. 

[Gnasher]

They're all out tonight.

[Numero Veinticinco]

2 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Why the fuvk shouldn't the opinions of someone like Maguire be shown on here? 

 

Because his opinions do not match yours so you not only attack the messenger but attack the platform. I'll post what I see fit. If you don't like it fuck off or put me on ignore. 

I agree with him. It’s nothing to do with whether or not his opinion matches mine, it’s that you’re replying to him on here. We know your opinion on it, you spam it over and over and over. It’s tedious. People quote you so putting you on ignore doesn’t work because you’re constantly in a slagging match. It’s just fucking spam. Inescapable spam. 

[Rico1304]

1 hour ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

Might want to ask the leading economists rather than Anubis.

They are two different things. He said renationalising energy would cost £60bn.  It’d cost a damn sight more than that.  Although no one ever answers what exactly they’d be nationalising.  Is it production or distribution or energy retailers, does it include MAPS MOP/MAMs 

[Jose Jones]

4 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

They are two different things. He said renationalising energy would cost £60bn.  It’d cost a damn sight more than that.  Although no one ever answers what exactly they’d be nationalising.  Is it production or distribution or energy retailers, does it include MAPS MOP/MAMs 

Basically the plan is just to nationalise @Rico1304.  Should be able to get you for about £45bn I'd have thought. 

[TheSire]

17 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

You realise the Tories are the ones who'll have to decide whether to go with it or not, yeah? If you think they're going to nationalise energy without paying fair wedge, then you're out of your mind. He could indeed say 'I back Gnasher', and then the Tories will laugh, fire up their media outlet friends, and go to fuckin' town. 

 

You can put ideology ahead of reality all you want, fuck all difference will be made. This at least has some chance and is fully budgeted and can actually help people. If it's not picked up by the government, yes, some people will die. You know this, surely, because it's a classic left-wing arguing point; nationalise and subsidise those are risk because they're dying of the cold. 

 

Anyway, I've spend more time on this than I should. 

You're wasting your time. He's a miserable crank and probably just enjoys complaining about anything and everything. 

[Numero Veinticinco]

6 minutes ago, TheSire said:

You're wasting your time. He's a miserable crank and probably just enjoys complaining about anything and everything. 

Ah, you've just inducted yourself into the cult mate. He'll be after you. 

[TheSire]

14 hours ago, Gnasher said:

What audience you aiming at here with that post?

 

The cunt crowd.

Which would be yourself 

[Gnasher]

4 minutes ago, TheSire said:

You're wasting your time. He's a miserable crank and probably just enjoys complaining about anything and everything. 

Fucking hell another one. 

 

"enjoys complaining" ...energy companies are making massive profits whilst thousands will die of starvation and hypothermia this winter.

[Numero Veinticinco]

1 minute ago, Gnasher said:

Fucking hell another one. 

 

"enjoys complaining" ...energy companies are making massive profits whilst thousands will die of starvation and hypothermia this winter.

And if you link enough Tweets on TLW forum, it'll definitely fix it.