*Shakes head* Everton again.

[Anubis]

PaddyPower trolling them again…

 

https://news.paddypower.com/football-news/2024/01/15/everton-charges-ffp-itv-post-office-show-satire-january-2024/

[dave u]

48 minutes ago, Anubis said:

Is Walters still trying to make up beef with Liverpool fans to try and keep himself relative?

 

Maybe I should tell him I'm a former football club owner and that he doesn't know what he's talking about.

[johnsusername]

1 hour ago, Scott_M said:

Because we all need protection from a club who hasn’t won a trophy since 1995 and got to 1 final since…

 

 

Everton have spent about £600m since 2016. Is that not top table spending?

 

I'm confused - are they still the Mersey Millionaires or are they The People's Club?

 

The thing is, they would LOVE to be at the top table and neither the club nor the fans would give a flying fuck about anyone below them.

[Rushies tash]

3 minutes ago, dave u said:

 

Maybe I should tell him I'm a former football club owner and that he doesn't know what he's talking about.

 

Carra will back you up

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

The PL will lose some credibility the longer the City charges drag on unresolved. 
 

But, the comparisons between City’s case and Everton’s are lazy and fail to acknowledge that the cases are totally different in nature. 
 

Everton have submitted two sets of financial statements which have breached the PL Profit & Sustainability Rules. That’s all that’s needed for the breach to be established. Then it’s for Everton to put forward a case as to why some of their losses shouldn’t count. 
 

But, City have not once submitted financial statements which have, on the face of it, breached the PSRs. The charges for City centre around the accuracy of the income and expenditure figures they’ve provided to show that they’re within the acceptable losses thresholds. 
 

It’s to be expected that a clear, admitted breach of the rules will be dealt with much quicker than a case which may involve the investigation of all sorts of fraudulent filings and falsified figures. 
 

I still have faith that City will get what’s coming to them. But it’ll take time. The PL and domestic football will become a ridiculous, obscene spectacle if nothing happens to City. And, the PL know this and I think they’ll do everything within their power to stop this from happening. 
 

 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 hour ago, Creator Supreme said:

That Tory bell can fuck right off.

Hahaha. I didn't spot who wrote that flapdoodle.

 

What a shit player he was.

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

One thing that amuses me about all this is the bloooos complaining that the big clubs are getting away with it, which is an implicit acknowledgement that they’re not a big club. 

[Anubis]

8 minutes ago, dave u said:

 

Maybe I should tell him I'm a former football club owner and that he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Change your Twitter name to Simon Jorden (Walters is too thick to spot the spelling of the surname) and we’ll club together for a blue tick for a few months while you troll him.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

37 minutes ago, Barnesey said:

1. Yes

2.a. Expensive lawyers

2.b. Yes, they were changed this season 

2.c.  City at least pretended that they hadn't broken the rules; Everton published the incriminating evidence in their accounts.

[Wezza]

Is other teams taking them to court still a thing? This will hardly help their cause. 

[dave u]

21 minutes ago, Nelly-Szoboszlai said:

The PL will lose some credibility the longer the City charges drag on unresolved. 
 

But, the comparisons between City’s case and Everton’s are lazy and fail to acknowledge that the cases are totally different in nature. 
 

Everton have submitted two sets of financial statements which have breached the PL Profit & Sustainability Rules. That’s all that’s needed for the breach to be established. Then it’s for Everton to put forward a case as to why some of their losses shouldn’t count. 
 

But, City have not once submitted financial statements which have, on the face of it, breached the PSRs. The charges for City centre around the accuracy of the income and expenditure figures they’ve provided to show that they’re within the acceptable losses thresholds. 
 

It’s to be expected that a clear, admitted breach of the rules will be dealt with much quicker than a case which may involve the investigation of all sorts of fraudulent filings and falsified figures. 
 

I still have faith that City will get what’s coming to them. But it’ll take time. The PL and domestic football will become a ridiculous, obscene spectacle if nothing happens to City. And, the PL know this and I think they’ll do everything within their power to stop this from happening. 
 

 

 

This is all true, we know the cases are different and one is far more complex than the other, but the reason people are pissed off is because Everton are by far the lesser evil here, yet they're getting done for a second time while we all have to wait ages for the other cunts to get theirs. Plus the rules are being changed in August, which you know will somehow end up massively helping City get a lighter punishment.

 

Everton are the bumbling shoplifter who looked up and waved at the security camera as they were leaving the shop with three packs of Revels in their pocket, whereas City are the Yorkshire Ripper, leaving bodies all over the place but covering their tracks and then just refusing to answer questions.

 

It's much easier to prosecute the shoplifter so they're doing that while the Ripper carries on killing until his trial date in the distant future.

[razor]

8 hours ago, TD_LFC said:

It's the first cost free, day 1 profit generating stadium, with it's very own UEFA Pro license.

 

It's going to wipe debts, give them untold wealth and turn them in to an all conquering team.

 

"Give it BMD til the end of the season..."

[tokyojoe]

1 hour ago, Harry Squatter said:

Clive Thomas?

[Lee909]

9 hours ago, manwiththestick said:

 

It's basically on par with the roman colosseum but accessible by boats.

 

 

The Colosseum is a good point. The Romans flooded it to put on a show of naval warfare to the public. Maybe we could do the same one team could be skippered by TLW own @Captain Turdseye

 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naumachia

[Lee909]

The delusion from them all that the new stadium will generate the funds to make them competitive is just that a illusion. 

 

Latest talk is it's cost 700ml. 

They've got what 15,000 extra seats. Corporate/boxes aren't going to sell that well. It would take them years just to pay off the costs and interest. Look at the second half of Wenger at Arsenal when tbe money was reigned in to pay for the stadium and that was with him working wonders keeping them in the champions league 

[Reckoner]

I must say I’m tremendously excited by all of this.

[Arniepie]

They all seem to think they are getting punished for building a new ground 

 

[manwiththestick]

9 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

They all seem to think they are getting punished for building a new ground 

 

But they can't tell you why that is.

 

Just like they can't tell us why the PL wants them gone.

[sir roger]

18 minutes ago, Lee909 said:

The delusion from them all that the new stadium will generate the funds to make them competitive is just that a illusion. 

 

Latest talk is it's cost 700ml. 

They've got what 15,000 extra seats. Corporate/boxes aren't going to sell that well. It would take them years just to pay off the costs and interest. Look at the second half of Wenger at Arsenal when tbe money was reigned in to pay for the stadium and that was with him working wonders keeping them in the champions league 

 

And that is without taking into account that 80% of their crowd are wearing school shorts to get in on under 16 tickets 

[Arniepie]

 

[Arniepie]

6 minutes ago, manwiththestick said:

But they can't tell you why that is.

 

Just like they can't tell us why the PL wants them gone.

I still think they will somehow survive it

[Barrington Womble]

1 hour ago, dave u said:

 

This is all true, we know the cases are different and one is far more complex than the other, but the reason people are pissed off is because Everton are by far the lesser evil here, yet they're getting done for a second time while we all have to wait ages for the other cunts to get theirs. Plus the rules are being changed in August, which you know will somehow end up massively helping City get a lighter punishment.

 

Everton are the bumbling shoplifter who looked up and waved at the security camera as they were leaving the shop with three packs of Revels in their pocket, whereas City are the Yorkshire Ripper, leaving bodies all over the place but covering their tracks and then just refusing to answer questions.

 

It's much easier to prosecute the shoplifter so they're doing that while the Ripper carries on killing until his trial date in the distant future.

 

 

What are these new PL PS rules? I knew the uefa model has changed (or changes this coming season) but I didn't realise the PL had changed too. Are the new PL rules in line with UEFA (salary and amortisation as a percentage of turnover). 

 

3 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

 

What the fuck is Everton spaces?

[Lee909]

6 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

 

 

 

Let me guess the opinion they took exception to is that they have admitted guilt

[Arniepie]

1 minute ago, Barrington Womble said:

 

 

What are these new PL PS rules? I knew the uefa model has changed (or changes this coming season) but I didn't realise the PL had changed too. Are the new PL rules in line with UEFA (salary and amortisation as a percentage of turnover). 

 

What the fuck is Everton spaces?

https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1vOxwjDYjLdJB

[johnsusername]

Part of me doesn't want them relegated - if they ended up winning the Championship you'd never hear the fucking end of it.