Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should the UK remain a member of the EU


Anny Road
 Share

  

317 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK remain a member of the EU

    • Yes
      259
    • No
      58


Recommended Posts

Interesting piece on R4 this morning about the EU. Apparently it has a higher approval rating over here than in France and Germany.

They have more sense than to give cunts like Farage and Johnson a platform to further their ambitions disguised as a referendum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting piece on R4 this morning about the EU. Apparently it has a higher approval rating over here than in France and Germany.

Generally because their governments,on occasion,do things for the benefit of their citizens rather than do almost everything to make their lives more miserable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had a pound for every person claiming to care about how undemocratic the EU is that didn't vote for their MEP I'd be on a fucking beach in the Bahamas.

In balance I don't think that many people actually vote FOR politicians/political parties, they don't vote governments in they vote them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In balance I don't think that many people actually vote FOR politicians/political parties, they don't vote governments in they vote them out.

Well they won't have tried to vote anyone out either.

 

Because they aren't really arsed about it being undemocratic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they won't have tried to vote anyone out either.

 

Because they aren't really arsed about it being undemocratic.

They are arsed about the loss of the right to have an influence. Some people don't vote because they are satisfoed with the status quo (amongst many other reasons obviously), but that doesn't mean they would happily give away their chance to ever have a say again.

 

After much consideration I am voting out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would they be losing the right to have an influence?

Because of the sheer volume of people, countries, cultures involved in the United States of Europe. 

 

The flip side of this is the argument that leaving the Tories to run the UK unrestrained by the powers that be in Europe is a scary scenario. I agree it is, but we would soon see them voted out of power if their policies became as extreme as people fear. 

 

In general terms, the more I have read and the more people I have spoken to, I can't see a reason to stay within the EU. Most arguments tend to be that to vote leave you need to be some kind of neoliberal, racist right winger, That's just rhetoric. This isn't a left wing - right wing issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because of the sheer volume of people, countries, cultures involved in the United States of Europe.

 

The flip side of this is the argument that leaving the Tories to run the UK unrestrained by the powers that be in Europe is a scary scenario. I agree it is, but we would soon see them voted out of power if their policies became as extreme as people fear.

 

In general terms, the more I have read and the more people I have spoken to, I can't see a reason to stay within the EU. Most arguments tend to be that to vote leave you need to be some kind of neoliberal, racist right winger, That's just rhetoric. This isn't a left wing - right wing issue.

Seems bizarre that you'd be arsed about your one vote mattering very little because there are a lot of people in Europe.

 

You elect an MEP in the same way you elect an MP. To represent your area.

 

Ironically voting out will quickly lead to Scottish independence meaning your parliamentary vote will mean absolutely fuck all in a hugely Tory new landscape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems bizarre that you'd be arsed about your one vote mattering very little because there are a lot of people in Europe.

 

You elect an MEP in the same way you elect an MP. To represent your area.

 

Ironically voting out will quickly lead to Scottish independence meaning your parliamentary vote will mean absolutely fuck all in a hugely Tory new landscape.

 

I don't see why a dilution of influence being a concern is bizarre. This is why Microsoft and loads of other Blue Chip Organisations want us to remain in Europe. They can centralise (and so reduce) their lobbying spend and gain yet more influence.

 

I live in Wales mate, we'd be next in line.

 

This is all speculation though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why a dilution of influence being a concern is bizarre. This is why Microsoft and loads of other Blue Chip Organisations want us to remain in Europe. They can centralise (and so reduce) their lobbying spend and gain yet more influence.

 

I live in Wales mate, we'd be next in line.

 

This is all speculation though.

But how is it any less democratic?

 

It isn't diluting your influence is it? You still get one vote, and as such have an equally infinitesimal influence either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because of the sheer volume of people, countries, cultures involved in the United States of Europe. 

 

The flip side of this is the argument that leaving the Tories to run the UK unrestrained by the powers that be in Europe is a scary scenario. I agree it is, but we would soon see them voted out of power if their policies became as extreme as people fear. 

 

In general terms, the more I have read and the more people I have spoken to, I can't see a reason to stay within the EU. Most arguments tend to be that to vote leave you need to be some kind of neoliberal, racist right winger, That's just rhetoric. This isn't a left wing - right wing issue.

 

You are obviously very lucky that you or your family don't need to rely on the NHS,are in Education or are out of work. It's already happening and has been for some time,and yet who is in power with less than a quarter of the vote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are obviously very lucky that you or your family don't need to rely on the NHS,are in Education or are out of work. It's already happening and has been for some time,and yet who is in power with less than a quarter of the vote?

I'm not saying this system is perfect, but the option is there for people to have an influence. I'd much prefer some form of proportional representation, but that's not what we are talking about here. I don't know why you presume to know things about me or my family?

 

Stu, why don't we just have a new world order then with one government? We could still have votes and we'd all still get a voice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying this system is perfect, but the option is there for people to have an influence. I'd much prefer some form of proportional representation, but that's not what we are talking about here. I don't know why you presume to know things about me or my family?

 

Stu, why don't we just have a new world order then with one government? We could still have votes and we'd all still get a voice.

The point I am making re family is that if you have a family and need to rely on those services then I am quite amazed that you would want to withdraw from an organisation that seems to care more about them than our own government. These services are on their knees at present and have been for a while under a government who are pandering to a small amount of powerful people to leave the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying this system is perfect, but the option is there for people to have an influence. I'd much prefer some form of proportional representation, but that's not what we are talking about here. I don't know why you presume to know things about me or my family?

 

Stu, why don't we just have a new world order then with one government? We could still have votes and we'd all still get a voice.

 

Well you can choose to have that system or not, it doesn't really change the fact that any claim about having your own personal influence diluted is just ridiculous.

 

You get one vote. It is almost entirely without influence (unless your MP is elected by one vote). That is not going to change based on the size of the chamber you are sending your representative to. It also doesn't make that representative any less accountable. 

 

I'd venture most people moaning about unaccountable and undemocratic representatives do not know who is on their local council either. The area where their vote theoretically is statistically most powerful. Again, this is because democratic accountability is not something they care about.

 

The option is there for people to have the almost exactly the same influence on their local council, MP and MEP. The "I want to have a say in what happens" argument just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point I am making re family is that if you have a family and need to rely on those services then I am quite amazed that you would want to withdraw from an organisation that seems to care more about them than our own government. These services are on their knees at present and have been for a while under a government who are pandering to a small amount of powerful people to leave the EU.

These services being on their knees has nothing to do with the EU. They have not been able to protect them, or they wouldn't be in such a mess.

 

Stu, the EU hasn't signed off accounts for twenty years and don't seem to be held to account by anybody. You can argue about the mathematics of the situation, but there is a deomcratic deficit and a lack of accountability. My personal belief is that we can have more influence over policy in a smaller state. This might be a matter of debate, but I feel more comfortable knowing we can vote out a government without having to get agreement with a large majority of Europe, and I'm not on my own, many other more qualified people have voiced these concerns. Not read all this yet, but it's along the lines of my thoughts https://www.socialeurope.eu/2015/04/understanding-the-european-unions-facade-democracy/

 

I know this referendum is not about a United States of Europe, but look how far we've come since we agreed to a financial union, and the direction of things is clear.

 

As I mentioned before, I think it plays into the hands of corporations influencing policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do wonder what the 'engine' for the EU is. Is it just Merkel? The French are rioting all the time and voting for right wing loons, the Scandos don't seem that fussed on the EU either - who actually is pushing this union forward? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do wonder what the 'engine' for the EU is. Is it just Merkel? The French are rioting all the time and voting for right wing loons, the Scandos don't seem that fussed on the EU either - who actually is pushing this union forward? 

Corporates and highly paid civil servants to name two parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...