Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

TLW picks the team v Sunderland


Paco
 Share

TLW picks the team v Sunderland  

30 members have voted

  1. 1. Who starts?

  2. 2. what formation?



Recommended Posts

Rodgers wanted to build around Sturridge which was a daft idea because he's always injured. Balotelli-Sturridge would have been ace and we've seen it for ~70mins, we bought Mario to play him alongside Sturridge, he's never been a lone striker, that's foreign to him and Rodgers does't make himself any favours by not playing him in a two. He has Borini for that, he can play Sterling and Markovic as strikers, yet he refufes to and all the blame is on the young players because "they don't deliver'. The players are out there, the system is there but Rodgers is too stubborn or arrogant to admit he's been wrong, his lineups are dreadful.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players that we should have aren't there for what we have spent, but I agree with you Brigant that Rodgers could make much more use of what he does have at his disposal. Pick your two fastest and play them up top. Even if it's a poor imitation of last season it would have been the same style. En este momento the players just seem lost and wander around in a daze. Coutinho has no-one making runs for him. No options. It's static and cumbersome. Very predictable and easy to defend against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now it looks like BR favors HIS signings/players over the committee signings because of the reasons... Lallana does fuck all and can't last full game, Lambert is just not good enough and it's cringeworthy watching him for so many games in a row in starting XI, Lovren is just a disgrace. Can can't get a game, Markovic needs a run of games like today NOT out of position, Moreno is ace, Manquillo is our best FB. Rodgers wants to prove something, not fucking sure what though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

Now it looks like BR favors HIS signings/players over the committee signings because of the reasons... Lallana does fuck all and can't last full game, Lambert is just not good enough and it's cringeworthy watching him for so many games in a row in starting XI, Lovren is just a disgrace. Can can't get a game, Markovic needs a run of games like today NOT out of position, Moreno is ace, Manquillo is our best FB. Rodgers wants to prove something, not fucking sure what though.

Fuck off....he can't last a full game because our manager deems it so, i'm fucking sure he could given the chance. When played he offers a damn sight more than other players and puts a shift in! To say he offers fuck all makes your knowledge of the game limited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's definitely some evidence that there could be politics going on behind the team selection. There's no way that what we are seeing right now is our best team and formation.

 

He finally brought Lucas in to shore the midfield up a bit and protect the back four, moving Gerrard further up the pitch where he can impact the game. Only after Carragher told him to on Sky though after the abortion of a performance at Palace. I don't think he can actually figure things out himself unless it's by chance. 

 

Some things appear strange though. Why aren't Sakho and Borini even making the squad? Is Balotelli really injured? Why has Can been bombed out of the side after two very adequate performances against top drawer Madrid and Chelsea teams? Not like we've played 5 shit teams since and had to watch Henderson play most of them instead when his confidence is shot and clearly jaded. That's without even getting into discussing the logic of transfer strategy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodgers wanted to build around Sturridge which was a daft idea because he's always injured. Balotelli-Sturridge would have been ace and we've seen it for ~70mins, we bought Mario to play him alongside Sturridge, he's never been a lone striker, that's foreign to him and Rodgers does't make himself any favours by not playing him in a two. He has Borini for that, he can play Sterling and Markovic as strikers, yet he refufes to and all the blame is on the young players because "they don't deliver'. The players are out there, the system is there but Rodgers is too stubborn or arrogant to admit he's been wrong, his lineups are dreadful.

And you diss my suggestions on the other thread. You're hilarious mate.

All the reasons ypu shold want someone else in.

He doesnt know what hes doing. Spent nearly a thrd of the season with our best player in the wrong position.

Rodgers is out of his depth, has signed a load of shyte, and only got 2nd because we had the best player and the world, and his mate playing next to him.

Cant build a side,

Cant recruit well.

Can't make telling substitutes.

 

And you call it drivel?

Fuck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you diss my suggestions on the other thread. You're hilarious mate.

All the reasons ypu shold want someone else in.

He doesnt know what hes doing. Spent nearly a thrd of the season with our best player in the wrong position.

Rodgers is out of his depth, has signed a load of shyte, and only got 2nd because we had the best player and the world, and his mate playing next to him.

Cant build a side,

Cant recruit well.

Can't make telling substitutes.

 

And you call it drivel?

Fuck off.

 

what question/suggestion/drivel? sorry, might have missed it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, Lambert is more like a nine and a half, a player who drops off the main striker but can also score goals. As an option, he's not a problem. The problem is we didn't sign someone who could replace Sturridge like for like

 

Why would the man who wanted Carroll out the door at all costs, want to sign Ricky Lambert at all?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you diss my suggestions on the other thread. You're hilarious mate.

All the reasons ypu shold want someone else in.

He doesnt know what hes doing. Spent nearly a thrd of the season with our best player in the wrong position.

Rodgers is out of his depth, has signed a load of shyte, and only got 2nd because we had the best player and the world, and his mate playing next to him.

Cant build a side,

Cant recruit well.

Can't make telling substitutes.

 

And you call it drivel?

Fuck off.

 

what question/suggestion/drivel? sorry, might have missed it

 

x2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

but he offers fuck all. Too much turns, too much flicks, too much poor crosses, too much time on MTV or whateva

Much? Do you mean "many?" Plus it is not his job to cross and being as he plays predominantly through the middle he hardly gets into a position to cross and rightly so. In other words, you are a prick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...