McKenzie vs Channel 4 reporter

[stringvest]

I haven't only thought about it ive done it, when they use'd to have the cunt on question time every couple of weeks. I used to be treated with a snobby fuck off disdain by the worlds so called greatest broadcaster.

 

After the hillsbourgh report i felt vindicated to complain for all them years of complaing and being fobbed of like im a cunt, and I'm not a busy body cunt with nothing better to do. Now they choose to employ a man like that with my money.

 

Make.no mistake these BBC cunts will be hearing my feelings on rent a gob mcenzie appearing on the nations national broadcaster, spouting shit and taking my money. They won't listen to a no mark like me, as they didnt before, but i don't give a fuck about the back slapping jimmy saville loving cunts.

 

To cut it short I'm not paying cunts to put cunts on my tv.

 

Well, it is by some distance the worlds best broadcaster.  But that doesn't excuse them having that shitstain on, I agree with you on that point.  If you write to them, perhaps go easy on the language if you want a reply.  

[Anubis]

Horrible oily shit with a face you wouldn't tire of twating. That smug gobshite Paxman is way too fond of the sound of his own voice too     

 

Bit harsh on Stringvest, that.

[stringvest]

I'm used to it.

[magicrat]

Bit harsh on Stringvest, that.

He's used to it

[stringvest]

See

[Gnasher]

Well, it is by some distance the worlds best broadcaster.  But that doesn't excuse them having that shitstain on, I agree with you on that point.  If you write to them, perhaps go easy on the language if you want a reply.

 

Would I dare upset the good old world of the jimmy saville loving British Broadcast Company by using a few choice swear words? Good god no.

[stringvest]

I don't think they love Jimmy Saville now, Rupert.

[dennis tooth]

Here's the cunt on news night for those with strong stomachs. The lady from sky gives the clown a good kicking. Why are the public funded bbc lining this cunts pockets? His point of views is irrelevant.

 

http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/4605147

 

Because he helps divide the poor for the rich's pleasure, why else does anyone appear in the mainstream news media?

[stringvest]

Dunno, ask Jon Snow.

[Gnasher]

I don't think they love Jimmy Saville now, Rupert.

The hairy cornflake?

[stringvest]

The Lairy Cornflake.  He's a cereal offender.

 

I've used it before, but it's worth a second airing.

[Gnasher]

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NduqttXVKmA

 

Tom Waits classic drunk on the moon

[Gnasher]

Good old British Journalism. And this is the country's most liberal newspaper,

 

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/apr/05/guardian-decision-run-opinion-piece-kelvin-mackenzie

[bouncebrigade]

A half arsed apology to finish.

[Curly]

Good old British Journalism. And this is the country's most liberal newspaper,

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/apr/05/guardian-decision-run-opinion-piece-kelvin-mackenzie

  

A half arsed apology to finish.

The fact they are so liberal in their approach would explain allowing cretins to air points that they may or may not disagree with, but that article was pretty much the most patronising apology I have ever witnessed.

[Jairzinho]

You get the odd decent article in the Guardian, but it is in the main a fucking dreadful newspaper.

[JohnnyH]

At least the piece acknowledges he's a scrott. It also confirms his paper under his leadership was a bigoted disgrace. And finally, I think it'll put off a few more editors from employing him. Not all sadly though.

[Tony Moanero]

You get the odd decent article in the Guardian, but it is in the main a fucking dreadful newspaper.

Why?

[magicrat]

 I just don't understand why his comments on anything are considered worth broadcasting or publishing , I wouldn't give the fucking oxygen thief house-room even if hadn't maligned the 96

[Iceman]

You get the odd decent article in the Guardian, but it is in the main a fucking dreadful newspaper.

 

 

Why?

 

Sometimes they have guest writers. 

[deiseach]

I had the pleasure of talking to a professional journalist about her job a few years back. In short, she brought home to me that to get on in that profession, you have to leave your humanity at the door. If you have qualms about rooting through people's garbage, whether that be metaphorically or literally, you will never get on. She had been doing it for 20 years and she had loved the rollercoaster ride of always being switched on looking for the main chance, but admitted that there was many a night she had cried herself to sleep over the way she had exploited the trust of people in service of The Story and had finally burned herself out (having a bun in the oven probably helped bring things to a head). The people who made the decision to publish MacKenzie fancy themselves as Woodward and Bernstein striking a blow for truth, yet they have far more in common with MacKenzie and his eagerness to look to the Führer than they would ever be able to admit, even to themselves.

[JohnnyH]

 I just don't understand why his comments on anything are considered worth broadcasting or publishing , I wouldn't give the fucking oxygen thief house-room even if hadn't maligned the 96

 

Because he was editor of the Sun when it was at it's biggest.  Keep in mind that the Sun is the biggest selling newspaper in the UK. So to answer your question, the country is, in the main, full of fuckwits who form their opinion on current affairs from what is basically "Zoo" magazine with an agenda to spread hate and fear coupled with their main selling feature being to shows a barely legal girls naked breasts in every issue. Regardless of the Hillsborough lies, that's quite a worry for the UK.

[magicrat]

Because he was editor of the Sun when it was at it's biggest.  Keep in mind that the Sun is the biggest selling newspaper in the UK. So to answer your question, the country is, in the main, full of fuckwits who form their opinion on current affairs from what is basically "Zoo" magazine with an agenda to spread hate and fear coupled with their main selling feature being to shows a barely legal girls naked breasts in every issue. Regardless of the Hillsborough lies, that's quite a worry for the UK.

I agree as to where where most of the Nation gets their opinions from but even so McKenzie left the S*n 20 years ago . He's 70 odd and hardly cutting edge . Anyway I mainly popped in to say he's a cunt again.  

[Furmedge]

I had the pleasure of talking to a professional journalist about her job a few years back. In short, she brought home to me that to get on in that profession, you have to leave your humanity at the door. If you have qualms about rooting through people's garbage, whether that be metaphorically or literally, you will never get on. She had been doing it for 20 years and she had loved the rollercoaster ride of always being switched on looking for the main chance, but admitted that there was many a night she had cried herself to sleep over the way she had exploited the trust of people in service of The Story and had finally burned herself out (having a bun in the oven probably helped bring things to a head). The people who made the decision to publish MacKenzie fancy themselves as Woodward and Bernstein striking a blow for truth, yet they have far more in common with MacKenzie and his eagerness to look to the Führer than they would ever be able to admit, even to themselves.

A friend of mine was recently approached by a reporter of the s*n to talk about a very high profile story to which the contents are still very raw to her. I say approached but it could be described as stalking or harrassment. She didn't want to talk to them for many reasons, H'boro connection included but also because she's still grieving and some of the stuff the Cunt was saying to her was either to provoke a reaction or bring her to her knees in tears and open up.

 

I understand there's a need to really push to get on, but in some cases it's a bit too much.

[magicrat]

A friend of mine was recently approached by a reporter of the s*n to talk about a very high profile story to which the contents are still very raw to her. I say approached but it could be described as stalking or harrassment. She didn't want to talk to them for many reasons, H'boro connection included but also because she's still grieving and some of the stuff the Cunt was saying to her was either to provoke a reaction or bring her to her knees in tears and open up.

 

I understand there's a need to really push to get on, but in some cases it's a bit too much.

I don't think S*n hacks have a monopoly on cuntishness . Grubby profession playing on the weak and vulnerable to peddle their rags.