Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Keir Starmer


rb14
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

He knows full we’ll, I told him here. He’s just repeating his own made-up nonsense now. 
 

 

Im not getting into the anti semitism, it's been done to death.

 

Reeves is nonchalant (at best) over the loss of 200,000 members. Its a ridiculous strategy when you need every vote you can get and imo its a main reason why Labour didn't pull up many trees in the recent council elections . 

 

Anyway enjoy Rachael I'm off out for tea 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

Have labour got any policies. I'm not being glib I've absolutely no fucking idea what labour stand for and speaking to people I know they feel the same. If there's some kind of message it's getting lost because the general consensus among people I know is the tories are fucking horrific but what are labour other than useless.

 

The popular policy of taking back the country's assets is not going to be a Labour party policy for some strange reason.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour have got to re-take Wakefield, haven't they? A Labour seat from the 1930s to 2019, when a child sexual abuser won with a 2.3% majority. The Tories disgraced themselves there and any far right voters have got a smorgasbord of cunts to split their votes.

 

IMG_20220609_204011.jpg

IMG_20220609_204036.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A smaller field in the Tiverton Tractor-Wanker's old seat (although there are still too many creepy right-wing weirdos). I don't really know what to expect there - although if UKIP, Reform, For Britain and the Heritage Party get into a fight with knives and bottles, that would be hilarious.

 

Screenshot_2022-06-09-20-46-38-62_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Labour have got to re-take Wakefield, haven't they? A Labour seat from the 1930s to 2019, when a child sexual abuser won with a 2.3% majority. The Tories disgraced themselves there and any far right voters have got a smorgasbord of cunts to split their votes.

 

IMG_20220609_204011.jpg

IMG_20220609_204036.jpg

So far ahead in the polls you’d think they’re definitely going to win it. I mean, if he can’t get a sim there then he can’t get a win anywhere. If he loses, he should go. If he does really well, maybe some can give him time and space. Probably not, that’s politics I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sir roger said:

Put yourself forward, Turdsy and then nut the bastard on election night live on tv as he comes looking for a patronising handshake.


That is pretty much the reason I didn’t go to the count last time. Couldn’t be arsed looking at his smug face again. My mate nearly smacked him in a pub but missed his chance and just ended up in a mini scuffle with his bodyguard. 
 

He says he’s not gonna miss next time. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

The popular policy of taking back the country's assets is not going to be a Labour party policy for some strange reason.

 

Presumably they feel the £200bn it would cost would be better spent on improving people's lives rather than grand ideologically-driven gestures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

So far ahead in the polls you’d think they’re definitely going to win it. I mean, if he can’t get a sim there then he can’t get a win anywhere. If he loses, he should go. If he does really well, maybe some can give him time and space. Probably not, that’s politics I guess. 

I think Labour will make alot of gains over the next couple of years by virtue of not being Tories. I think it's a deliberate strategy given how fucking anonymous they've been over the state these cunts have got the country in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keir Stramer is the opposite to Boris Johnson, says all the right things but has no charisma/personality, whereas Johnson says and does all the wrong things but has the charisma to pull it off and gets away with things like a slippery pig. There's something about Stramer as soon as he starts talking I immediately switch off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rushies tash said:

I think Labour will make alot of gains over the next couple of years by virtue of not being Tories. I think it's a deliberate strategy given how fucking anonymous they've been over the state these cunts have got the country in.

It definitely was a strategy to let them hang themselves, it’s the one I said they needed to adopt when Starmer got in. But that can’t go on forever, they need to pick the right time so that when the attacks land, they stick in the minds of the voters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rushies tash said:

I think Labour will make alot of gains over the next couple of years by virtue of not being Tories. I think it's a deliberate strategy given how fucking anonymous they've been over the state these cunts have got the country in.

It definitely was a strategy to let them hang themselves, it’s the one I said they needed to adopt when Starmer got in. But that can’t go on forever, they need to pick the right time so that when the attacks land, they stick in the minds of the voters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

It definitely was a strategy to let them hang themselves, it’s the one I said they needed to adopt when Starmer got in. But that can’t go on forever, they need to pick the right time so that when the attacks land, they stick in the minds of the voters. 

They really need one of their more straight talking MPs to say something along the lines of "these cunts always claim to be the party of fiscal responsibility, but the reality is the opposite. They borrow billions to fund tax cuts before fucking off to let Labour pick up the pieces". Or words to that effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Rushies tash said:

They really need one of their more straight talking MPs to say something along the lines of "these cunts always claim to be the party of fiscal responsibility, but the reality is the opposite. They borrow billions to fund tax cuts before fucking off to let Labour pick up the pieces". Or words to that effect.

They actually have. Quite a lot, quite loudly, and quite widely covered. Nandy has been taking no prisoners. I still think it’s too early to go full on, because it doesn’t count if the voters forget it. But it’s ratcheting up, for sure. What I don’t want is them to come off like petulant children having a slagging match. That’ll turn voters off, at least the ones who want serious people running the country. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...