Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

I think there was some Scottish disillusion with Blair's leagacy, but what really fucked Labour in Scotland was the Scottish independence referendum. Seeing Milliband share a platform with Cameron telling the Scots to reject independence planted a seed in Scottish minds that Labour were "red Tories". It was a catestrophic misjudgement by Milliband to campaign with Cameron.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jairzinho said:

It's also about timing. It's why, in my opinion, it's very difficult to look at the success of a politician in an era where the political and economic circumstances were different generally and conclude that it could be replicated in the current era. These things tend to have a shelf life.

 

In order to get centrism, in my opinion, you need the working class to be doing okay. Yeah, there is creeping privatisation, and the rich are getting richer, but we're doing okay. Blair's vote dropped steadily over his tenure, but there was no great clamour for socialism or anything on the right. Because people were still doing okay, especially in comparison with the Thatcher years. That isn't the case now. The breaking point, to some extent, has been reached. There are fewer and fewer sections of society, or job sectors, that are benefiting from the current economic system. And the desire in these situations is rarely to make small changes back to what you had before. It's for change.

 

Dan Carlin calls it the revenge of the gangrenous finger. When the government turns it's back on certain elements of society, society at large will still function, but it creates a deep seated resentment within that specific isolated group. When enough sections of society feel that way, that's when the pendulum swings and the system gets brought to it's knees by the people.

 

He coined the phrase talking about the Russian Revolution, but he's actually got an episode devoted to Brexit called "The Revenge of the Gangrenous Finger" and it's all about what you've just described.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

It started way before the Corbyn project, to be honest. It’s an unattractive feature of the left to eat itself, including any leftist progress made by centre-left or centrist politicians. I’ve heard Blair referred to as right wing and far right wing, which is quite clearly just not right. Far from perfect, even outside of the ward, but also far from the devil his demonisers try to make out. I mean, fuck the guy, but Hitler’s lovechild he ain’t. 

Not Hitler’s lovechild, no. Just Thatcher’s wet dream

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would have thought years of calling him a threat to national security would have an effect on the forces ?

 

Just this morning IDS has said Corbyns sole purpose is to do damage to this country.

 

I notice all the right wing nut cases today are unable to say Corbyn without saying Marxist in the same sentence.  

Demonise someone and then express outrage when people react to your message. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Scooby Dudek said:

Just this morning IDS has said Corbyns sole purpose is to do damage to this country.

Perfectly reasonable shout about somebody who has served in the British Parliament for 35 years. You've got to admire his dedication to damaging the country, but really he deserves criticism for just how little he has managed to damage it in that time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On message straight way. 

 

From Nigel Adams' registration letter today;

 

It now seems that you and your cabinet have decided that a deal - cooked up with a Marxist who has never once in his political life, put British interests first - is better than no deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cable:

 

One week he's attacking Corbyn for walking out:

 

Quote

Meanwhile Jeremy Corbyn’s kinder, gentler politics was found wanting this evening as he stomped out of the meeting with the Prime Minister before it began, rather than breathe the same air as Chuka Umunna.

Quote

That is rather a strange way to behave in a national crisis.

 

Two weeks later he's attacking him for walking in:

 

Quote

This is just piling more logs on the log jam. Does the PM seriously think we can have a German style Grand Coalition between her and Jeremy Corbyn to deliver Brexit. May meets Marx?

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...