Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

*Shakes head* Everton again.


Fugitive

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, an tha said:

If they ever got bought ala abu dhabi fc and then won stuff the pivot from all the corinthian bullshit they trot out and the pivot away from their local club for local people shite to we are rich and look at us we have got fans from all over the world, we are massive, would be breathtakingly swift.

 

They've shown signs of doing just that even with very limited stuff like Usmanov investing a tenner in them and James Rodriguez attracting 25 twitter followers from further afield than Conwy.

They can just fuck off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Harry Squatter said:

A founding member of the Premier League. Fucking hell.

 

You were in the top flight the year it changed its name.

But they were very much at the forefront of forming a breakaway league as a member of the greedy 5 or that was only der red shite

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, bizzle10 said:

But they were very much at the forefront of forming a breakaway league as a member of the greedy 5 or that was only der red shite

Yes and their chairman at the time Philip Carter (who was a staunch Tory) tried to push for a British Super League which would have meant several smaller clubs in the First division would have been pushed out to accommodate the Old Firm, Aberdeen and Dundee United. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as news emerged of secret meetings between John W Henry and Joel Glazer regarding Project Big Picture, reports of talks involving the top clubs in 1985 indicated that the idea of a Super League was a real possibility, due to the dissatisfaction of the Division One big-hitters.

A meeting in September 1985 between the Big Five - Arsenal, Tottenham, Everton, Liverpool and Manchester United - along with Manchester City, Newcastle and Southampton, came to a startling conclusion. Unless certain demands were met, the top clubs expressed a desire to form a breakaway league under the Football Association, ending the control of the Football League. 

There were many reasons cited for this outcome. But the bottom line was that the chairman of the top clubs wanted a bigger share of television and sponsorship money, plus greater voting rights, in echoes of the current situation. Yet the alternative plans laid out by the chairman of the eight clubs in 1985 - they were later joined by Aston Villa, West Ham, Watford and Sheffield Wednesday - were radical.

Proposing a top division of 20 clubs (reduced from 22) and an extra two clubs in Division Two (taking the total to 24), the plan went further in that it suggested the bottom two divisions should be regionalised, administered separately to the top two divisions, and have closer links to the Gola League. 

Alex Fynn, a representative of the Saatchi and Saatchi advertising agency representing the league explained the reasoning: "It would be more of an event for say Tranmere to meet Bolton or Preston in a North West division than to travel down to Torquay." But the move would also force many clubs to go part-time, and access to the top two divisions would be limited.

Reports in the Express suggested that promotion out of the bottom "feeder leagues" would be restricted to "clubs of stature", and that the top two divisions would work on a two-up two-down system to reduce the fear factor. Other proposals included switching the FA Cup to midweek, a British Cup to replace the Milk Cup, and clearing more weekends so that national teams would benefit from extra preparation time.

"I am sad that these reports are leaking out, but given the pressures that clubs are facing it is not entirely unexpected," League secretary Graham Kelly revealed, as the murmurings began. With the European club ban, falling attendances, a ban on alcohol in grounds, safety improvements, and no television coverage of football at the start of the 1985/86 season, clubs were feeling the financial strain.

An unnamed source at one of the clubs involved indicated the potential of the plans: "The mind boggles at the marketing possibilities of a small group. We have no option but to do it, and there is no better time. It is not a question of greed. Unless we do it we may all go down." The talk of a revolution increased in volume as the winter progressed.

In essence, the Division One clubs wanted 50% of all sponsorship and television money, two votes per Division One club in Football League ballots, and a reduction in the voting majority needed from the 75% to 60%. Power and money; that's just the way it is, some things will never change. Ultimately, the Super League concept was used as a bargaining chip to ensure that the bigger clubs got what they wanted.

"We cannot allow ourselves to sink for the benefit of all," Everton chairman Philip Carter explained. "If our plan does not go through, the First Division will have to look at the future again." Manchester United chairman Martin Edwards backed up this view. "Make no mistake, the big bang will happen unless the rest of the League give us their backing."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Harry Squatter said:

Just as news emerged of secret meetings between John W Henry and Joel Glazer regarding Project Big Picture, reports of talks involving the top clubs in 1985 indicated that the idea of a Super League was a real possibility, due to the dissatisfaction of the Division One big-hitters.

A meeting in September 1985 between the Big Five - Arsenal, Tottenham, Everton, Liverpool and Manchester United - along with Manchester City, Newcastle and Southampton, came to a startling conclusion. Unless certain demands were met, the top clubs expressed a desire to form a breakaway league under the Football Association, ending the control of the Football League. 

There were many reasons cited for this outcome. But the bottom line was that the chairman of the top clubs wanted a bigger share of television and sponsorship money, plus greater voting rights, in echoes of the current situation. Yet the alternative plans laid out by the chairman of the eight clubs in 1985 - they were later joined by Aston Villa, West Ham, Watford and Sheffield Wednesday - were radical.

Proposing a top division of 20 clubs (reduced from 22) and an extra two clubs in Division Two (taking the total to 24), the plan went further in that it suggested the bottom two divisions should be regionalised, administered separately to the top two divisions, and have closer links to the Gola League. 

Alex Fynn, a representative of the Saatchi and Saatchi advertising agency representing the league explained the reasoning: "It would be more of an event for say Tranmere to meet Bolton or Preston in a North West division than to travel down to Torquay." But the move would also force many clubs to go part-time, and access to the top two divisions would be limited.

Reports in the Express suggested that promotion out of the bottom "feeder leagues" would be restricted to "clubs of stature", and that the top two divisions would work on a two-up two-down system to reduce the fear factor. Other proposals included switching the FA Cup to midweek, a British Cup to replace the Milk Cup, and clearing more weekends so that national teams would benefit from extra preparation time.

"I am sad that these reports are leaking out, but given the pressures that clubs are facing it is not entirely unexpected," League secretary Graham Kelly revealed, as the murmurings began. With the European club ban, falling attendances, a ban on alcohol in grounds, safety improvements, and no television coverage of football at the start of the 1985/86 season, clubs were feeling the financial strain.

An unnamed source at one of the clubs involved indicated the potential of the plans: "The mind boggles at the marketing possibilities of a small group. We have no option but to do it, and there is no better time. It is not a question of greed. Unless we do it we may all go down." The talk of a revolution increased in volume as the winter progressed.

In essence, the Division One clubs wanted 50% of all sponsorship and television money, two votes per Division One club in Football League ballots, and a reduction in the voting majority needed from the 75% to 60%. Power and money; that's just the way it is, some things will never change. Ultimately, the Super League concept was used as a bargaining chip to ensure that the bigger clubs got what they wanted.

"We cannot allow ourselves to sink for the benefit of all," Everton chairman Philip Carter explained. "If our plan does not go through, the First Division will have to look at the future again." Manchester United chairman Martin Edwards backed up this view. "Make no mistake, the big bang will happen unless the rest of the League give us their backing."

 

A British Cup would be a good alternative to the League Cup.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Anubis said:

 

I still can't wrap my head around the outrage of one potential yellow card incident. That was it! Young two yellows no arguments both where yellow plus he got away with one, the handball is as clear a handball as you will ever see. Everton claiming they where robbed... of what you had nothing, showed nothing. Compared to the rest of the seasons games for everyone this was a well reffed game, compared to the spurs game which was easily the worst officiated game I've watched in my entire life it was a masterclass in reffing. Blame Young for being a complete dickhead, blame Keane for stupidity and blame Dyche for having no bollocks.

 

Their managers and players afterwards too, especially Dyche after our spurs game. When they say "it all balances out" they do realise that means some other side has to face injustice for that to happen but that certainly wasn't in this game Everton being a Everton and the media desperate to turn a shit game into something dramatic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It serves Dyche’s interests to take the heat off his shit football and tactics on the day.

 

It serves Everton fans interests to be hard done by and have something else to feed into their ‘everyone is out to get us’ narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Karl_b said:

 

A British Cup would be a good alternative to the League Cup.

It would eliminate lower league clubs and make them have to travel even further afield and incur more costs. This is ok for the PL and some Championship teams but not for most. The regional leagues idea really should make a return though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anubis said:

It serves Dyche’s interests to take the heat off his shit football and tactics on the day.

 

It serves Everton fans interests to be hard done by and have something else to feed into their ‘everyone is out to get us’ narrative.

It serves our interests: if they admit that they deserved to lose, they might try to do something to change it.  As it is, they'll go into the rest of their games believing that you can put in a shithouse display, refusing to even try to attack, and the only thing that can stop you getting a result is corrupt refereeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

I still can't wrap my head around the outrage of one potential yellow card incident. That was it! Young two yellows no arguments both where yellow plus he got away with one, the handball is as clear a handball as you will ever see. Everton claiming they where robbed... of what you had nothing, showed nothing. Compared to the rest of the seasons games for everyone this was a well reffed game, compared to the spurs game which was easily the worst officiated game I've watched in my entire life it was a masterclass in reffing. Blame Young for being a complete dickhead, blame Keane for stupidity and blame Dyche for having no bollocks.

 

Their managers and players afterwards too, especially Dyche after our spurs game. When they say "it all balances out" they do realise that means some other side has to face injustice for that to happen but that certainly wasn't in this game Everton being a Everton and the media desperate to turn a shit game into something dramatic.

 

That's my view, they seem to be getting all mental because of 1 yellow - although obviously as that made a red it's a big decision. But tarkowski got away with one with that free kick on the edge of the box when on a yellow. 

 

But it seems to me they think konate is a massive red, young shouldn't have been sent off and it wasn't a pen. I don't quite know why they think this. 

 

But anyway, fuck them, the mental cunts. They're on a run of games at the moment where it looks hard work for them between now and Christmas. If they set up every week the way they did this week, they won't have many more points now than they will then. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...