Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Ched Evans


Bjornebye
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here's a question....

 

As a currently convicted rapist, he's on the sex offender's register.

In his line of work, he's required to perform in front of spectators (not through windows though), in much the same way as a stage actor might be required to perform before an audience.

 

In the 'audience' (in his case spectators), there will be a number of minors. Some of whom may or may not be accompanied by an adult.

 

I wonder what the actual legal implications of this are. 

 

 

And yet you were allowed on here without the slightest sniff of a petition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a question....

 

As a currently convicted rapist, he's on the sex offender's register.

In his line of work, he's required to perform in front of spectators (not through windows though), in much the same way as a stage actor might be required to perform before an audience.

 

In the 'audience' (in his case spectators), there will be a number of minors. Some of whom may or may not be accompanied by an adult.

 

I wonder what the actual legal implications of this are. 

 

He's a rapist, not a paedophile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you are pretty sure at no time did you make any effort to not consent right?

 

And it was the same girl you went to bed with, not someone who helped themselves right?

I was in my bed passed out. A few people were staying at mine and a load of other people knew the back door of my house at the time was open. I have very little recollection, but this girl let herself into my house and the rest is history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normal people don't just take someone to court over a consensual one night stand Spy. She was getting shagged by multiple men whilst others filmed it outside so they could send it to their mates and show it around town. They could of uploaded that on the internet and ruined that girls life.

 

Your acting like this is just a drunken one night stand with two consensual adults when this was blatantly a girl being taken advantage of by a bunch of sick twats.

How is this relevant to what I posted? I just said her testimony was that she didn't remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is this relevant to what I posted? I just said her testimony was that she didn't remember.

 

My mistake i meant to quote this

 

This is an honest statement, but it might not sit well with some: In the same way as that girl was raped, I have been raped in the last 12 months. I did wake up a bit regretful and I did feel a bit dirty, but luckily I could barely remember any detail at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the bloke fucked some pissed up slut. So what? Shouldn't even be a crime, let alone a sentence to a lifetime of unemployment and incessant faux outrage from a bunch of cunts that have no other interest in football apart from when it comes to moralising to everyone within earshot about it. Hats off to Oldham if they decide to take him on and well done them for not allowing themselves to be dictated to by some shitty local businesses threatening to take their names off the match-day programmes.

 

 

I think Ched Evans is entitled to work and Oldham are entitled to employ him, so I guess we agree on that much. Where we differ is I think people are entitled to protest against his employment, in the same manner as people objected to Luke McCormick and Lee Hughes getting back into football. I think we can respectfully disagree on that, even if you seem to be unaware of the backlash that greeted their situations at the time. Are you one of the types who have been smearing his victim and making her life a misery, such as this? I really don't think 'rape community' is too strong a term for such a revolting point of view.

 

 

I'm not smearing anyone. As in most rape cases it's her word against his. We have a legal system not a justice system, and the legal system found him guilty. That a jury chose to believe her doesn't mean I should, and it certainly doesn't mean that we can call him a rapist on account of the legal system pronouncing him one, but then decide we're not following the legal system when it comes to deciding the extent of his punishment. I the jury have decided he's innocent, which by default makes her a lying slut. That's just logic. It will be interesting to see opinions change if the legal system subsequently changes its mind on appeal.

 

 

An abomination of a post, that. Internet troll at work there.

 

good-way-to-be-alone.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the same way as that girl was raped, I have been raped in the last 12 months. 

 

 

In the sense that I was way to pissed to consent and woke up with someone that I would not have gone to bed with if sober.

 

 

She was getting shagged by multiple men whilst others filmed it outside so they could send it to their mates and show it around town. 

 

 

I was in my bed passed out. 

 

 

How is this relevant to what I posted? I just said her testimony was that she didn't remember.

 

I would imagine what people are taking exception to is the suggestion that it is somehow similar - I know I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His girlfriends father must be crazy or he has something on him.

 

At best, he admitted to cheating on his daughter. Now her dad is funding the appeals/legal fees/PR/website and now for him to join Oldham by funding any losses of sponsorship on top of which he will be paying some of his wages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His girlfriends father must be crazy or he has something on him.

 

At best, he admitted to cheating on his daughter. Now her dad is funding the appeals/legal fees/PR/website and now for him to join Oldham by funding any losses of sponsorship on top of which he will be paying some of his wages.

With that avatar I can't help reading every one of your posts as if you are pissing yourself writing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spy to make it more like the Ched Evans case. It'd be like you waking up with a horrendous hangover from the night before to find someones shit smeared all over your chest. Whats worse is your chained to the bed so it takes you hours to wrestle your hands free. During this time a vague memory hits you of the night before, you were bladdered and took some bird home, you remember something about handcuffs but that's it.

 

When you check your works twitter account you realise SD has posted a video under the title "Cleveland Steamer" to all your clients, on your myspace account and on here. It's also getting heavy rotation on Pornhub. As you pluck up the courage to watch the video you see the scene you remember, you and some bird stumbling into your house in the early hours of the morning.

 

You see the girl carry you into your bedroom and start blindfolding you. She then takes a pair of handcuffs and chains you to the bed. At this point your naked and you've done what any sensible man in that situation would do for a blow job. But then she leaves the room and in creeps a man. As you look closer you realise that man is Strontium Dog. Dog then proceeds to squat over your comatose body and lays a foul elongated log right on the centre of your chest before disappearing into the night like the Scarlett Pimpernel, with the camera in tow. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my knowledge there was no blindfold or handcuffs involved?

 

The fact it's been dragged through the media is vile, but I am just talking about the act itself. As literally stimulating as your comparison is, I wouldn't consider it an accurate analogy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spy to make it more like the Ched Evans case. It'd be like you waking up with a horrendous hangover from the night before to find someones shit smeared all over your chest. Whats worse is your chained to the bed so it takes you hours to wrestle your hands free. During this time a vague memory hits you of the night before, you were bladdered and took some bird home, you remember something about handcuffs but that's it.

 

When you check your works twitter account you realise SD has posted a video under the title "Cleveland Steamer" to all your clients, on your myspace account and on here. It's also getting heavy rotation on Pornhub. As you pluck up the courage to watch the video you see the scene you remember, you and some bird stumbling into your house in the early hours of the morning.

 

You see the girl carry you into your bedroom and start blindfolding you. She then takes a pair of handcuffs and chains you to the bed. At this point your naked and you've done what any sensible man in that situation would do for a blow job. But then she leaves the room and in creeps a man. As you look closer you realise that man is Strontium Dog. Dog then proceeds to squat over your comatose body and lays a foul elongated log right on the centre of your chest before disappearing into the night like the Scarlett Pimpernel, with the camera in tow. 

 

No idea which case you're thinking of but none of that sounds anything like the Ched Evans case. Really.

 

For a start, the girl was nothing like comatose on account of her cheerfully giving consent for Evan's mate to rattle her.  After the point that she did that, she spent about an hour fucking about in a kebab shop, travelled to a hotel and spent more time in the hotel before Evans turned up, during which time she had nothing more to drink.  You can see in the cctv from the hotel that she's not falling around the floor or being carried into the place.

 

Even she doesn't dispute that by the way.  She said she couldn't remember the night the day after, a lot of people seem to have equated that mentally with her being passed out, or on the verge of it.  I kind of get how that happens, but just take a look a the Christmas night out thread on the GF for plenty of examples of people not remembering the previous evening whilst clearly not being passed out and instead actively engaged in such actions as having fights, calling married directors at work milfs in front of their husbands and telling senior colleagues that they're cunts.

 

As I've said before I wasn't there so I don't know what happened either.  That's exactly why I'm very glad I wasn't on that jury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...