Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

The 97


Anubis
 Share

Recommended Posts

The cunt lawyer for one of the cunts was stood on the steps of the court after the collapse, with a gang of smug cunts, saying how the money "wasted" on these trials throughout the process could have been better used to build hospitals "especially in Liverpool".

 

I hope the cunt never reaches a hospital when he needs it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Preston Red said:

The cunt lawyer for one of the cunts was stood on the steps of the court after the collapse, with a gang of smug cunts, saying how the money "wasted" on these trials throughout the process could have been better used to build hospitals "especially in Liverpool".

 

I hope the cunt never reaches a hospital when he needs it. 

Lawyers moaning about wasting public money is like Jimmy Saville moaning about Barry Bennell molesting kids. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bjornebye said:

I've just heard what he said I can't believe that a) he has said it and b) he has been allowed to say it. This fucking country 

is a shit hole. Full of wankers, cunts and arseholes, led by the biggest twat of them all. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm led to believe that the CPS are at least partly to blame for pursuing a charge of "perverting the course of justice" rather than "misconduct in a public office" or similar. 

 

None of us is surprised that there has been an abject failure to hold key people to account, and that many many people will celebrate the "rioting fans" narrative. 

 

Different standards where our city and our club are involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rb14 said:

I'm led to believe that the CPS are to blame for pursuing a charge of "perverting the course of justice" rather than "misconduct in a public office" or similar. 

 

None of us is surprised that there has been an abject failure to hold key people to account, and that many many people will celebrate the "rioting fans" narrative. 

 

Different standards where our city and our club are involved. 

They seem to have charged them with something which, even when the facts of the case are proved, isn't actually an offence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lifetime fan said:

Jongold@btinternet.com

Thanks for this. Just sent the cunt a polite email saying he should retract his comments and apologise.

 

He reckons he was "merely describing the case which in 1989 the police instructed my client who was then their solicitor to put forward."

 

Yeah, that's why the BBC actually apologised for the comments!?

 

He must be getting bombarded with mails because I got an almost instant reply.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, dockers_strike said:

Thanks for this. Just sent the cunt a polite email saying he should retract his comments and apologise.

 

He reckons he was "merely describing the case which in 1989 the police instructed my client who was then their solicitor to put forward."

 

Yeah, that's why the BBC actually apologised for the comments!?

 

He must be getting bombarded with mails because I got an almost instant reply.

 

 

Looking at his profile he seems to be one of these cunt lawyers who gets paid shitloads for representing scumbag murderers and taking great delight in getting them off on legal technicalities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dockers_strike said:

Thanks for this. Just sent the cunt a polite email saying he should retract his comments and apologise.

 

He reckons he was "merely describing the case which in 1989 the police instructed my client who was then their solicitor to put forward."

 

Yeah, that's why the BBC actually apologised for the comments!?

 

He must be getting bombarded with mails because I got an almost instant reply.

 

 


He told me he was quoting court statements from the original court case. 
 

Lying piece of shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...