Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should the UK remain a member of the EU


Anny Road
 Share

  

317 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK remain a member of the EU

    • Yes
      259
    • No
      58


Recommended Posts

About 2/3 of people who voted Labour in the 2015 General Election voted Remain in 2016. That's from the Ashcroft survey, which is still the best assessment of who voted what.

 

I didn't challenge that, because it's correct.

 

(The bit about "70% of Labour constituencies" is a different statistic altogether.)

It's impossible to tell whether the first stat is acurate, it can't be too hard with the second, I'm not sure both can be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's impossible to tell whether the first stat is acurate, it can't be too hard with the second, I'm not sure both can be true.

Why not?

 

If you understand about statistics I'm sure you could contact the Ashcroft organisation to find out their methodology to see whether or not it was sound. In any case it is generally recognised as the most reliable statistics we have.

 

Both statistics can clearly be true. The point about 70% of Labour constituencies is that it also counts non-Labour voters in those constituencies. It's not a particularly useful statistic, because the Referendum wasn't counted that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not?

 

If you understand about statistics I'm sure you could contact the Ashcroft organisation to find out their methodology to see whether or not it was sound. In any case it is generally recognised as the most reliable statistics we have.

 

Both statistics can clearly be true. The point about 70% of Labour constituencies is that it also counts non-Labour voters in those constituencies. It's not a particularly useful statistic, because the Referendum wasn't counted that way.

It's a fair point, but let's not pretend it was all the none Labour voters in the Labour constituencies voting for leave and visa versa.

 

Lets not pretend the thick, unemployed, racist, Northern leave voting stereotype that's done the rounds in here votes Tory either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a fair point, but let's not pretend it was all the none Labour voters in the Labour constituencies voting for leave and visa versa.

 

Lets not pretend the thick, unemployed, racist, Northern leave voting stereotype that's done the rounds in here votes Tory either.

Immigrants make up something like 1% of Sunderland's population and the north east is actually losing its population and needs people to move there to sustain any kind of business model. Yet somehow the EU and immigration has blighted the Mackem's lives. I'd say they are a bit thick at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Immigrants make up something like 1% of Sunderland's population and the north east is actually losing its population and needs people to move there to sustain any kind of business model. Yet somehow the EU and immigration has blighted the Mackem's lives. I'd say they are a bit thick at best.

Yes you're absolutely right to brand 82,394 people as thick for not voting the same way as you, judging the motives for why they ALL voted the way they did.

 

I could imagine the uproar in here now if a Mackem came in here and said he voted the way he did because the 82,394 immigrants that live in the North East are all lazy benefit scroungers.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Education was a much more useful indicator of vote though. The more educated a person the more likely they were to vote remain. It's all in the Ashcroft report.

 

Or to put it more simply for you, thick people were much more likely to vote leave.

Unfortunately most Labour voters are the least educated,academical qualifications of course. Having said this though it doesn't take much to work out how much we have benefited from the EU versus how much we havent from our own governments. You'd have to be a special kind of moron not to see how much Merseyside has been regenerated since the devastation of Thatcherism and not see how EU money has helped in that regeneration. As for Sunderland,I would guess that EU money may have been a big reason as to why Nissan located there and have stayed since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Immigrants make up something like 1% of Sunderland's population and the north east is actually losing its population and needs people to move there to sustain any kind of business model. Yet somehow the EU and immigration has blighted the Mackem's lives. I'd say they are a bit thick at best.

I prefer the word "gulled".

 

I suspect people didn't vote in the Referendum on the basis of what was best for their town; it was a national issue, so I suspect people were motivated by what they believed was best for the country.  People in the UK have, for decades, been routinely lied to about the scale and the negative impacts of both immigration and of EU "interference".

 

Given the consistent noise of anti-EU, xenophobic propaganda over the years, it's quite impressive that almost half the population voted to remain.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

Regarding education and class etc, is it just a coincidence that everybody on the news reports who was brassy, loud, coarse, spouting ill informed, irrelevant shite and who wouldn't look out of place on a Jeremy Kyle line up just so happened to vote leave then?

 

Hmmmmmmm?

 

NJ was knocked back by JK for being to thick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for me it illustrates the sorry position the labour party is in, when the most sense from a labour figure on this subject has had to be a tory war monger.

When Tony Blair is the only person of note in politics making sense and standing up for my political believes it's time to re access my position.

 

Soz to point out the glaringly obvious but no one else seems to be...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Tony Blair is the only person of note in politics making sense and standing up for my political believes it's time to re access my position.

 

Soz to point out the glaringly obvious but know one else seems to be...

You back farage, Johnson and another bunch of fucking scumbags. It wasn't very long ago there was only farage and the likes of combat 18 backing your line. You're in no place to criticise anyone's position.
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You back farage, Johnson and another bunch of fucking scumbags. It wasn't very long ago there was only farage and the likes of combat 18 backing your line. You're in no place to criticise anyone's position.

Yes mate there's now 17million plus of us Combat 18 lot, but we still don't have anywhere near as close as the blood on our hands as your new political poster boy!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Corbyn Tells Tony Blair To Respect The Result

 

Tony Blair's call for a cross-party movement to try to force a change of course on Brexit is "unhelpful", Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said.

 

Mr Corbyn urged the former Labour prime minister to "respect" the referendum result and work on helping to define the UK's future EU relationship.

 

In a speech on Friday, Mr Blair said that a weakened Labour Party was acting as "the facilitator of Brexit".

But Mr Corbyn said: "We are going to be outside the European Union."

Speaking in the City of London, Mr Blair said that the British people had made the referendum decision without knowing on what terms Britain would leave the European Union.

 

He said pro-Europeans needed to build a movement across party lines to challenge Brexit, in the absence of effective opposition in Westminster.

"The debilitation of the Labour Party is the facilitator of Brexit. I hate to say that, but it is true," he said.

 

Mr Corbyn told reporters at the party's conference on local government at Warwick University on Saturday: "Well, it's not helpful.

"The referendum gave a result, gave a very clear decision on this, and we have to respect that decision, that's why we didn't block Article 50.

"But we are going to be part of all this campaigning, all these negotiations about the kind of relationship we have in Europe in the future."

He added: "The referendum happened, let's respect the result. Democracy happened, respect the result."

 

Media captionTony Blair wants the UK to find "a way out from the present rush over the cliff's edge"

Mr Corbyn rejected Mr Blair's suggestion that the party was weak, pointing to its surge in membership to more than 500,000.

"I don't quite know what Tony means there. Our party membership has more than doubled, we had a big campaign to remain and reform the European Union," he said.

"We are now pursuing a policy which will try and protect jobs and conditions across this country but also maintain a good relationship with colleagues across Europe."

 

Mr Corbyn urged Mr Blair to get behind the party's vision of a future outside the European Union with high investment and reduced inequality, rather than a low-tax economy aligned with the US under President Donald Trump.

 

He said: "We are going to be outside the European Union. We are not leaving the continent of Europe, we are still going to work with them.

"I think it would be helpful if people put their energies in the direction of building those good relations and ensuring we have a viable economy, not some offshore tax haven bargain basement, doing deals with Trump's America.

"My job is to take our party forward into an investment-led economy that reduces inequality in this country, that builds houses when people need them, that gets the good jobs people need in the hi-tech industries the National Investment Bank will fund.

"Get on board with that strategy."

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39016392?ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbc_daily_politics_and_sunday_politics&ns_source=facebook&ns_linkname=news_central

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...