Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

The Conflict in Afghanistan


Section_31
 Share

Recommended Posts

Kabul airport is looking like the Jerusalem airport scene in World War Z. Military helicopters chasing people out of the path of military transports. People clambering onto commercial aircraft not realising they’re grounded. Horrible to watch.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just seen Mohammed Alanjee’s tweet. He is, of course, entitled to his opinion. However, he is also a member of The Law Society, an organisation that promotes diversity and equality. His tweet implies tacit support for a regime that doesn’t. Personally, I think he’s bringing the profession into disrepute.

 

Anuone else wanting to lodge complaint can log on to the Law Society website and find details on how to go about it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Fully expecting a new wave of shithouse attacks across Europe in the next 12 months. 

You reckon? It was Bin Laden who was originally holed up there wasn't it that was exporting terror, not the Taliban, who always seemed more concerned with just running Afghanistan and producing heroin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Section_31 said:

You reckon? It was Bin Laden who was originally holed up there wasn't it that was exporting terror, not the Taliban, who always seemed more concerned with just running Afghanistan and producing heroin.

The thousands of prisoners released from government camps in the last few days, many will be Al Qaeda and Islamic State. Them claiming this victory over there could easily fuel radicalism over here. I hope I'm wrong like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Varoufakis is celebrating the end of "liberal-neocon imperialism". Stop The War Coalition is demanding reparations for Afghanistan. There's a lot of time left in the day, but these are some strong opening bids.

 

A new challenger enters the arena

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Families of British soldiers who died on previous tours of Afghanistan have criticised the British and US governments’ handling of the withdrawal from the nation as the Taliban starts to seize control.

Speaking to the PA news agency, Graham Knight, 69, father of 25-year-old RAF Sergeant Ben Knight who was killed when his Nimrod aircraft exploded in Afghanistan in 2006, said the British government should have moved more quickly to get civilians out.

He said:

We’re not surprised that the Taliban have taken over because as soon as the Americans and the British said they were going to leave, we knew this was going to happen. The Taliban made their intent very clear that, as soon as we went out, they would move in.

As for whether people’s lives were lost through a war that wasn’t winnable, I think they were. I think the problem was we were fighting people that were native to the country. We weren’t fighting terrorists, we were fighting people who actually lived there and didn’t like us being there.

Ian Sadler, 71, whose 21-year-old Trooper son Jack died when his Land Rover struck a mine in Afghanistan in 2007, told PA:

I was surprised the Americans and the allies had so much confidence in the Afghan national army.

Why did they think the Afghan national army would be able to keep the Taliban back based on just numbers alone? Why did our Government and allies have so much confidence in them?

It proved to be rubbish, really. Why did the president say Kabul will never fall when, at the same time, he must have been planning his escape?

To pull them out so quickly like that... I would have thought it would have been more of a strategic advantage to reduce the British and American influence. When the Nato forces were pulled out so suddenly, the Afghan National Army were left without any direction.

I don’t think any of the British Governments - Labour, coalition or Conservative - have handled the situation in Afghanistan particularly well... The level of support given to our soldiers in Afghanistan was trivial.

It wasn’t until we were out there for about 10 years that the urgent operational requirements came in. Why weren’t our soldiers equipped with mine-protected vehicles? We would have lost a lot less.”

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Colonel Bumcunt said:

 

Just point a finger at them sternly and say "ok, we see you, your card is marked if we endure terror attacks with you helping them we will carpet bomb you for a month". 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, JagSquared said:

Didn’t work last time so it’s a hollow threat. 

After decades of continuous war, is there even that much left to bomb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...