Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Grenfall Tower Fire


Recommended Posts

I'm not appealing to authority I'm acknowledging his credentials. It's not started yet and you've written it off as a whitewash and citing a report from the 80's.

If you think the Widgery Tribunal took place in the 80's there is no point in engaging with you any further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/grenfell-tower-fire-risk-assessor-carl-stokes-buried-fire-risk-report-kensington-and-chelsea-tenant-a7819386.html

 

Fire consultant Carl Stokes was paid £244,318 over seven years as fire risk assessor for Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO), according to documents seen by Inside Housing.

 

And ​Mr Stokes advised the organisation that they did not have to disclose safety risks and risk being obliged to deploy expensive “additional fire safety measures”, the Mail on Sunday reported.

 

A Fire Risk Assessment for Grenfell Tower submitted by Mr Stokes to KCTMO in November 2012 suggested burying the report because the London Fire Brigade “have the power to undertake an audit of the fire risk assessment to determine if it is suitable and sufficient or not.”

 

Mr Stokes was recommended to KCTMO directors by housing official Janice Wray as “willing to challenge the fire brigade on our behalf if he considered their [safety] requirements to be excessive.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't read in a very balanced way.  It reads like a staunch defence of the appointment of Sir Martin Moore-Bick, with a nod towards increasing legal aid funding to give it a conscionable sheen.

 

Opinions heh? You see what you want to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hmmmmm....

 

llCaVWi.jpg

 

 

Is this the Tories latest attempt at consensus politics? 

What happens if the answers show a wish for better refuse collection than dealing with affordable housing? If it's a draw do they fit out refuse bins and market them as Bijou apartments and offer them to the Grenfell residents before proclaiming they have rehoused them all locally?

How on earth is the amoebic individual who thought of this survey even still in employment? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

Nice gesture mate. Maybe they have been occupied with other things though and not everyone takes the offer of Charity up. These people lost everything, a free holiday is nice but they still need transport to and from, clothes, spending money, the time etc etc. I'm guessing they have been quite busy trying to get their lives back to some sort of normality and getting basic things sorted. 

 

You may still get takers if the offer is an open one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice gesture mate. Maybe they have been occupied with other things though and not everyone takes the offer of Charity up. You may still get takers if the offer is an open one. 

To be fair, they've been through enough without having to contemplate Cornwall in November and February

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...