Remembrance Day

[AngryOfTuebrook]

31 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Not sure the pic accurately reflects the events here.

 

Fucking cunt editors know what they're doing.

[Section_31]

If that's not coked up I don't know what is.

 

 

[ZonkoVille77]

7 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

If that's not coked up I don't know what is.

 

 

 

 

I can't be the only one wishing that bus had flattened the cunt. 

[Kevin D]

 

[TheHowieLama]

 

 

[Gnasher]

It should calm down once they get a few pints of cider and a couple of lines of beak down them.

[Arniepie]

Just now, Gnasher said:

It should calm down once they get a few pints of cider and a couple of lines of beak down them.

Yep

a bag of lemo should calm them down

[Bjornebye]

56 minutes ago, Anubis said:

Ha, my old English teacher him 

[redinblack]

24 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

If that's not coked up I don't know what is.

 

 

Make their way to the Cenotaph where the march isn't going. Silly, silly cunts

[TheHowieLama]

Coppers getting on the front foot of the media blitz

 

The Met Office has posted a video on Twitter showing the “violence and abuse” police have suffered today at the hands of counter protesters, who threw bottles and other missiles.

[Chip Butty]

“England till I die”

 

Really do wish they would. 

[clangers]

3 minutes ago, Chip Butty said:

“England till I die”

 

Really do wish they would. 

Which England are they referring to? A pre-1940's white only England that never really existed?

[Rushies tash]

My lads team's WhatsApp group has been interesting this morning. First reposting a fake audio purporting to be Sadiq Khan calling for armistice day to be moved to accommodate the march - of course calling him a racist cunt, why doesn't he fuck off etc. It went quiet for a bit when I told them it was fake. Then I was treated to little emoji claps of approval for Douglas Murray's interview where he appeared to suggest that if the police won't protect us from those disrespecting our sacred traditions then someone else will have to. I fucking despair.

[Gnasher]

Willard breaks police ranks. 1.38

 

Definitely him.

 

 

[Arniepie]

[redinblack]

2 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

And people cheer this cunt on. He is Donald Trump, but not orange. Fucking Hell

[TheHowieLama]

Taxi looks pretty woke.

[Arniepie]

5 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Willard breaks police ranks. 1.38

 

Definitely him.

 

 

so they assign half the plod in the country to patrol the palestine martch..and leave about 4 to contain those bellends  

[redinblack]

The Met have said the fake video involving Sadiq Khan " doesn't constitute a crime" . The Met, and this country, is absolutely fucked.

 

 

 

 

[Bruce Spanner]

1 minute ago, redinblack said:

The Met have said the fake video involving Sadiq Khan " doesn't constitute a crime" . The Met, and this country, is absolutely fucked.

 

 

 

 

 

It being wrong and it not being criminal are two different things.

 

It doesn't, yet, constitue a crime which is true.

[TheHowieLama]

1 minute ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

It being wrong and it not being criminal are two different things.

 

It doesn't, yet, constitue a crime which is true.

 

Fake/deepfake videos are going to have to come under the umbrella of libel.

[redinblack]

Just now, Bruce Spanner said:

 

It being wrong and it not being criminal are two different things.

 

It doesn't, yet, constitue a crime which is true.

How is attributing something to someone that is patently not true not a crime? Because it is a libel and a civil case rather than criminal? Surely this is incitement to disorder which must be criminal?

[Bruce Spanner]

Just now, TheHowieLama said:

 

Fake/deepfake videos are going to have to come under the umbrella of libel.

 

Yeah, they'll have to be some legislation soon.

 

The can be criminal in sexual harassment cases and that is their only real censure as of now, I think.

 

Facebook are leading the charge and getting ahead of things by ensuring that any digitally doctored image has to be identified if it is sent through political organisations.

[Bruce Spanner]

2 minutes ago, redinblack said:

How is attributing something to someone that is patently not true not a crime? Because it is a libel and a civil case rather than criminal? Surely this is incitement to disorder which must be criminal?

 

Maybe under another law, but there's no law currently against it, except in the case of sexual harassment.

[TheHowieLama]

2 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

Yeah, they'll have to be some legislation soon.

 

The can be criminal in sexual harassment cases and that is their only real censure as of now, I think.

 

Facebook are leading the charge and getting ahead of things by ensuring that any digitally doctored image has to be identified if it is sent through political organisations.

 

It has become a big problem with high school age girls in the US - deepfake nudes and porn.

 

At least thats what I have heard...