Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

The cunting Daily Mail thread.


Chris
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

Classic Littlejohn.  Open with a lie about Muslims - always a reliable warm-up for the bigoted shitheads - before raging against gays and trans people.  Witless fucking shite. 

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4737828/LITTLEJOHN-ll-say-Nelson-gender-fluid.html#newcomment

 

All you need to know about the brainless, soulless cunts who lap this shite up is that two of the highest rated comments are "You couldn't make it up" and "This country is FINISHED".

 

He either writes purely for reaction and doesn't believe it or he is quite possibly the most closeted man on the planet.

 

Everything he ever writes seems to end up with him shoehorning a reference to people being gay or trans, for someone who is so against it he spends an inordinate amount of time keeping an eye on them.

 

I got banned from the Daily Mail website for suggesting he wasn't fooling anyone by constantly criticising gays. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh they're wonderful aren't they? Bless the Fail!

Absolutely disgraceful rag that hasn't improved since persecuting poor Jewish immigrants fleeing the Nazis in the thirties. I love the excuses you get from people you catch reading this shite. With the scum in the old days it always seemed to be 'I only get it for the racing page' but the Mail excuse seems to be 'I get it for the Missus.'

 

Back in the day, if I ever caught anybody buying the scum in the supermarket I would berate them in the queue and this after religiously putting all copies of the rag beneath other papers. Can't bring myself to do that with the Mail but still hate the bastards that buy it.

 

Many moons ago I was travelling home from town on a bus when I spotted a fella behind me reading the scum and being very drunk at the time set fire to it with my lighter causing a scene which looked like the start of Bonanza. The Mail deserves the same treatment. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely disgraceful rag that hasn't improved since persecuting poor Jewish immigrants fleeing the Nazis in the thirties. I love the excuses you get from people you catch reading this shite. With the scum in the old days it always seemed to be 'I only get it for the racing page' but the Mail excuse seems to be 'I get it for the Missus.'

 

Back in the day, if I ever caught anybody buying the scum in the supermarket I would berate them in the queue and this after religiously putting all copies of the rag beneath other papers. Can't bring myself to do that with the Mail but still hate the bastards that buy it.

 

Many moons ago I was travelling home from town on a bus when I spotted a fella behind me reading the scum and being very drunk at the time set fire to it with my lighter causing a scene which looked like the start of Bonanza. The Mail deserves the same treatment.

I'd vote for that!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I see Tony Parsole is bigging up the Mail on his tweets...

 

tony_bigger.jpeg  Tony ParsonsVerified account @TonyParsonsUK

If the Daily Mail is truly the Great Satan, and the wicked font of all bigotry and evil, then remind me what national newspaper went after the murderers of Stephen Lawrence. Here's a clue - it wasn't the Guardian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Tony Parsole is bigging up the Mail on his tweets...

 

tony_bigger.jpegTony Parsons‏Verified account @TonyParsonsUK

If the Daily Mail is truly the Great Satan, and the wicked font of all bigotry and evil, then remind me what national newspaper went after the murderers of Stephen Lawrence. Here's a clue - it wasn't the Guardian.

In fairness, they did do the right thing that time. Once. Twenty years ago.

 

The rest of the time, they devote their energies to fomenting the kind of hatred that got Stephen Lawrence (and so many others) killed.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fairness, they did do the right thing that time. Once. Twenty years ago.

The rest of the time, they devote their energies to fomenting the kind of hatred that got Stephen Lawrence (and so many others) killed.

 

 

The Mail were originally quite hostile and took a pop at the anti-racist campaigners. It was only when the reporter realised Neville Lawrence did a bit of graft on Dacres house the reporting changed apparently following a direct conversation.

 

THE Daily Mail, the newspaper which last week named as ‘murderers’ the five white youths linked to the killing of black teenager Stephen Lawrence, was originally hostile to the campaign to bring his killers to justice…

the reporter dispatched to cover the story last night told the Observer that the Mail changed its editorial line to support the close family of Stephen Lawrence when it emerged that Stephen’s father had once worked as a plasterer and decorator for Paul Dacre, the paper’s editor.

When the newspaper first covered the story in 1993, Hal Austin said he was ‘detailed’ to write a ‘knocking’ story about the Lawrence campaign, which it believed was orchestrated by a ‘rent-a-mob’, did not have the family’s approval and which it condemned in a fierce leader…

In May 1993, shortly after Stephen’s murder at a bus stop in Eltham, south-east London, the paper sent Mr Austin, a black reporter, to interview his parents, Neville and Doreen.

Stephen’s murder had ignited passions in the area. On the previous Saturday, 19 people, including five policemen, had been injured in street protests. Several rival political and anti-racist groups had contacted the Lawrences to offer their support.

The initial Mail approach was to treat the ‘campaign’ with hostility. Mr Austin, who no longer works for the Mail, said yesterday: ‘I was detailed to write a story knocking the campaign.’

During the interview with the family, Mr Lawrence asked what would appear and made inquiries about the Mail editor. He asked if he was a tall, balding man with a house in Islington. It emerged he had worked for Mr Dacre some 10 years previously. Mr Austin advised the dead boy’s father to contact Mr Dacre directly. It is understood that there was a phone call to Mr Dacre at about this time.

‘The following day my instructions were suddenly changed,’ Mr Austin said. ‘I was told by the news desk to forget the previous instructions and that they now wanted a positive story.’ Mr Austin felt the original approach undermined the family’s case because it implied that their grievances were not to be taken seriously.

https://www.butireaditinthepaper.co.uk/2012/01/05/the_daily_mails_initial_coverage_of_the_stephen_lawrence_murder/index.html

 

This from Nick Davies Flat Earth News.

 

Bw15fx_HCEAA2_UXA.jpg

 

Bw15fv_QCMAA82_Av.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Wouldn't say the majority at all and thete are obvious issues with underfunding but too many people do go to hospital when the shouldn't. Most due to no access to a doctor or being told its 2 weeks to see one.

 

The other issue with beds too many people holding up beds due to lack of careers at home or care home places (not thete fault and more issues with tory underfunding)

 

 

Littlejohn still a wanker mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VT brand, yeh yeh.

 

 

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/virgin-trains-stop-selling-on-board-copies-of-daily-mail-after-staff-complaints-on-papers-immigration-stance/

 

Virgin Trains has stopped stocking copies of the Daily Mail in its on-board shops after staff complained about the paper’s stance on immigration, gay rights and unemployment.

 

Richard Branson’s company also said the newspaper was “not compatible” with the company’s brand and beliefs. Branson has previously been critical of the vote to leave the EU and Donald Trump’s “Muslim” migration ban.

 

A Virgin Trains spokesperson told Press Gazette: “We regularly review the products we have on sale for customers on-board our trains, and after listening to feedback from our people we have decided that we will no longer stock copies of the Daily Mail on services on our west coast route.”

 

In an internal memo, seen by PR Week, Virgin Trains staff were told: “Thousands of people choose to read the Daily Mail every day. But they will no longer be reading it courtesy of VT [Virgin Trains].

 

 

“There’s been considerable concern raised by colleagues about the Mail’s editorial position on issues such as immigration, LGBT rights, and unemployment.

 

“We’ve decided that this paper is not compatible with the VT brand and our beliefs. We won’t be stocking the Daily Mail for sale or as a giveaway.”

 

The Daily Mail and other right-wing newspapers are the target of a campaign by Stop Funding Hate to persuade companies not to advertise or run promotions with them.

 

Stationery company Paperchase were criticised after they apologised for advertising in the Daily Mail last November. Lego and The Body Shop have also announced that they will no longer run promotions in the paper.

 

A Daily Mail spokesperson said: “It is disgraceful that, at a time of massive customer dissatisfaction over ever-increasing rail fares, and after the taxpayer was forced to bail out Virgin’s East Coast mainline franchise – a decision strongly criticised by the Mail – that Virgin Trains should now announce that for political reasons it is censoring the choice of newspapers it offers to passengers.

 

“It is equally rich that Virgin chose to launch this attack on free speech in the ASLEF trade union journal.

 

“For the record Virgin used to sell only 70 Daily Mails a day. They informed us last November that to save space, they were restricting sales to just three newspapers: the Mirror, FT and Times.

 

“They gave no other reason, but it may be no coincidence that all those titles, like Virgin owner Sir Richard Branson, are pro-Remain.”

 

A tweet by a reporter at the Mail,

 

Paul Bentley

@PaulyBentley

At the Mail, gay journalists have senior positions across news, politics, features. The Mail had the first gay sports editor. Banning the Mail - and content written by many proud gay people - is a political decision that has nothing to do with journalism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...