Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Hank Moody said:

I can assure you he is not.

 

I think he is on this. For a while I've thought he was cool, and he has touched on some real issues that I've been surprised at, but I'm not having the latest shit he's been going on about whilst ignoring so many key things. I think he's a fraud when it comes to this subject and he'll often be a divisive figure as time passes on other key subjects, maybe before backtracking later on if things don't go his way.

 

I'm done with believing he's just out to help Labour and that's all he's doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I accept that there's a chance I'm being too "conspiratorial" and Jones is just amazingly ignorant on parts of this problem. Maybe he'd even think I was being an anti-Semite if he knew of my views on this subject, so maybe we'd both be mistaken about each other. But he seems like such an intelligent guy that it baffles me how he's not seen some of the over the top crap going on. If nothing else he's highly ignorant of some of the aspects of what's happening here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, moof said:

He’s a bright lad so he’ll know exactly what he’s doing. I don’t like it either. He is definitely guilty of spinning shit to suit his agenda on occasion. He’s certainly not great on Israel/Palestine 

Aye, he's just playing the game. Possibly a little too accepting of the rules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Babb'sBurstNad said:

Or maybe he just holds an opinion contrary to your own?

 

For someone of his intelligence going on about anti-Semitism regularly like he does, to not give a fair share of acceptance of the other side of this is just ignorant for me. All of the other side are just dismissed and probably in his eyes anti-Semites themselves.

 

And he's still a cunt too for that all conspiracism = anti-Semitism comment. How fucking stupid you have to be on that subject to believe that I can't get my head around. Maybe that's why I got a bit kneejerk, it's crazily wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's apparently been suspended for being provocative towards (aka disagreeing with) the Jewish community (apart from the "wrong kind of/self-hating Jews")

 

He was a bit of a troll and his comment could've been better worded. But, he's essentially been suspended for not agreeing with the lie that Labour is "institutionally antisemitic." 

 

It sets a very dangerous precedent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

Chris Williamson has been suspended. 

 

Can anybody tell me which bit of the IHRA definition he's breached? Or has he just upset people for not agreeing with the narrative they're trying to push? 

*sigh* 

 

Appeasement never works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

Of course you have.

 

Feel free to address the argument rather than the man, any time you want.

What is the argument? That he isn’t a gaping chasm of a vagina of a man? Well, he is. Consider the argument forensically addressed, dickwad. 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have had the parliament station on in the background this afternoon. all a bit groundhog day with brexit. not for the 1st time though, i thought david lammy was bang on. i don't know too much about him - but why isn't he in the shadow cabinet? he's about the only one on the labour benches who absolutely nails the tories every time. that is what we need from the opposition. maybe i just see/read specific bits he's good on, but he seems head and shoulders above nearly all the labour front bench. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...