Halsey: Referee standards have dropped to alarming levels

[Barrington Womble]

2 hours ago, Pete said:

I thought Webb said Hooper wouldn't be involved in any of our games for the rest of this season or was that the VAR bod who fucked up?  Either way, what a shit show it all is. 

That was the VAR I think. 

[Baresi]

Hooper reffed us against Sheff Utd away. 

[DaveT]

1 hour ago, Baresi said:

Hooper reffed us against Sheff Utd away. 

You mean the game where Mac Allister was trodden on so badly he was cut nearly to the bone…. without even a yellow card being shown?

[Barrington Womble]

8 hours ago, Baresi said:

Hooper reffed us against Sheff Utd away. 

Did he? There were loads of reports this was his first game. 

[ZonkoVille77]

These cunts are going to decide the title, not goals scored. Shithouse, corrupt cunts. 

[Tj hooker]

Was it the bent cunt Tierney on Var because if it was it would explain a lot 

[ZonkoVille77]

3 minutes ago, Tj hooker said:

Was it the bent cunt Tierney on Var because if it was it would explain a lot 

 

Yep, it was. 

[Tj hooker]

8 minutes ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

 

Yep, it was. 

Enough said disgraceful performance by a corrupt cunt , that foul on Diaz if that's the other way round he's calling Madley over to the screen for it no doubt in my mind 

[Kevin D]

There were some strange decisions in that West Ham/Sheffield Utd game.

[Barrington Womble]

That explains everything. 

[Bobby Hundreds]

57 minutes ago, Tj hooker said:

Enough said disgraceful performance by a corrupt cunt , that foul on Diaz if that's the other way round he's calling Madley over to the screen for it no doubt in my mind 

100 percent. He shouldn't be officiating our games, he's either letting bias cloud his judgement or he's completely corrupt.

[Tj hooker]

 

 

 

[an tha]

2 hours ago, Tj hooker said:

Enough said disgraceful performance by a corrupt cunt , that foul on Diaz if that's the other way round he's calling Madley over to the screen for it no doubt in my mind 

 

Without a shadow of a doubt.

 

It is silly now.

[an tha]

1 hour ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

100 percent. He shouldn't be officiating our games, he's either letting bias cloud his judgement or he's completely corrupt.

I don't believe it is corruption as such - he just has a problem with us and every chance he gets to grind his axe via an action or inaction that he can, he takes.

 

 

[Tj hooker]

3 minutes ago, an tha said:

I don't believe it is corruption as such - he just has a problem with us and every chance he gets to grind his axe via an action or inaction that he can, he takes.

 

 

Is blatant cheating Corruption then ?  ,  because he obviously has an agenda against us and while he has his bent fucking mate Webb standing his corner he knows full well he can keep on doing it .

[Paulie Dangerously]

[No2]

Could be that the commentator just made a mistake but he said they were still looking at a possible handball in our box. The ball had been cleared and the throw-in already taken by Bournemouth. If he was right then that's solid proof that baldy cunt has an agenda.

[Tj hooker]

7 minutes ago, No2 said:

Could be that the commentator just made a mistake but he said they were still looking at a possible handball in our box. The ball had been cleared and the throw-in already taken by Bournemouth. If he was right then that's solid proof that baldy cunt has an agenda.

I remember them saying they were checking for a possible handball against Joe Gomez but obviously nothing came from it 

[an tha]

1 hour ago, Tj hooker said:

Is blatant cheating Corruption then ?  ,  because he obviously has an agenda against us and while he has his bent fucking mate Webb standing his corner he knows full well he can keep on doing it .

Yeah can deffo argue it is corruption - i suppose bias and an agenda from officials who are supposed to be impartial and apply the laws of the game consistently and fairly not doing so is corruption.

[Barrington Womble]

6 hours ago, an tha said:

Yeah can deffo argue it is corruption - i suppose bias and an agenda from officials who are supposed to be impartial and apply the laws of the game consistently and fairly not doing so is corruption.

The thing is, corruption does not have to involve money or anything like that. It often does, because mostly in life, that's why people would choose to be dishonest. But dishonest conduct alone without payment, is corruption.

 

If anyone doubts Paul Tierney's corrupt behaviour, it's because they do not wish to think of people who enforce the rules of our game as dishonest. In just the same way much of our population doesn't believe/want to believe members of the police force can be dishonest. But it's a reality of human nature some will. In the same way, it's the reality of human nature some referees will be corrupt. 

 

How do we protect against such behaviour? In the same way as you would in any walk of life. Use evidence (very easy in football) to assess behaviour and performance and if that person is a significant outlier to the norm, act, even if initially all that would be is take opportunity away. If PGMOL worked as hard as that bore Paul Tomkins, Paul Tierney wouldn't have be around Liverpool or Manchester games quite some time ago. 

[Barrington Womble]

8 hours ago, Tj hooker said:

 

 

 

 

Hackett is spot on there. I understand the argument challenges like that should not be red, but as we've seen often (and not just the Curtis incident) that those tackles are red. It's quite remarkable the same referee when on VAR supported the red card against Mac Allister this season, but yet could not find a way to ask the referee to look at this incident again. 

 

 

[NoelM]

This shit really pisses me off too, an article saying that clubs shouldn't be writing to the PGMOL to complain about decisions - guess what, he doesn't mention Arteta or Arsenal - he mentions us after the Spurs game.

Also that c*nt Neville mentioned us too when referencing Forests complaint. You cannot compare the incident in our game with the other ones?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/jan/22/premier-league-nottingham-forest-brentford-jonathan-wilson

 

 

[Lario]

https://twitter.com/benjaminlfc/status/1749413589411139709

[Lee909]

So they are saying the Kluivert tackle was deemed reckless and a yellow card worthy so VAR can't get involved. Honestly like Curtis red I agree both are yellow cards, it's unintentional but a foul and you've caught the player. VAR should be able to get involved imo. Because potentially it's a big incident if the player is on a yellow already or later gets a yellow. If your going to have VAR limiting it's use is stupid. You don't need to take time reviewing the incident. Either, it's a quick, next time the ball goes out book Kluivert over the coms

[Tj hooker]

Only a yellow fuck off