Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Boss said:

It wasn't speculation that drove the mortgage market up, it was cheap credit and the banks relaxing their policies on borrowing to include people with a poor credit rating.

 

That's not true at all. Speculation was a major contributor to the housing bubble that precipitated the financial crisis. Both in terms of housing speculation by buyers, and investor speculation on mortgage-backed securities.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

 

That's not true at all. Speculation was a major contributor to the housing bubble that precipitated the financial crisis. Both in terms of housing speculation by buyers, and investor speculation on mortgage-backed securities.

 

It definitely had a component of speculation, no doubt about it - like any bubble. It was equally caused by the low interest rates and the greed of the banks abandoning strict lending requirements to take advantage of it. There were multiple factors at play. It wasn't purely speculative, but yeah speculation certainly played it's part on both sides (buyer and investor).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Boss said:

 

It definitely had a component of speculation, no doubt about it - like any bubble. It was equally caused by the low interest rates and the greed of the banks abandoning strict lending requirements to take advantage of it. There were multiple factors at play. It wasn't purely speculative, but yeah speculation certainly played it's part on both sides (buyer and investor).

I think the main factor was foreigners der terk er jerbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buying a house for your primary residence is not speculation -- it is investment. 

 

Buying a house (or a few) with the goal of flipping them in a few months is speculation.

 

Safe to say, most on here believe Corbyn (that was after all how the discussion began) invested in his home correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheHowieLama said:

Buying a house for your primary residence is not speculation -- it is investment. 

 

Buying a house (or a few) with the goal of flipping them in a few months is speculation.

 

Safe to say, most on here believe Corbyn (that was after all how the discussion began) invested in his home correct?

Yes, I think that just about ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

You buy a house because you need a place to live, not because you're speculating on price increases (unless you're a cunt).

I missed this, are you a cunt for buying a house in order to make money from it from its increase in value or as a holiday letting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

Buying a house for your primary residence is not speculation -- it is investment. 

 

Buying a house (or a few) with the goal of flipping them in a few months is speculation.

 

Safe to say, most on here believe Corbyn (that was after all how the discussion began) invested in his home correct?

I disagree with your definitions.

 

Buying a house for your primary home is just, y'know, buying something you need. It's a purchase, like when you buy your dinner or your clothes. 

 

Buying a house in need of renovation, working on it (adding value to it) and selling it on is an investment. It is a productive activity. 

 

Buying a house, doing nothing to it and waiting for the price to increase due to the actions of others (Government economic policy, local investments, etc.) is speculation. It is an unproductive activity. 

 

I have no idea about Corbyn's living arrangements, but I suspect it falls into the first category. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Buying a house for your primary home is just, y'know, buying something you need. It's a purchase, like when you buy your dinner or your clothes. 

No tax

2 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Buying a house in need of renovation, working on it (adding value to it) and selling it on is an investment. It is a productive activity. 

Tax

2 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Buying a house, doing nothing to it and waiting for the price to increase due to the actions of others (Government economic policy, local investments, etc.) is speculation. It is an unproductive activity. 

Tax

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

I disagree with your definitions.

 

Buying a house for your primary home is just, y'know, buying something you need. It's a purchase, like when you buy your dinner or your clothes. 

 

Buying a house in need of renovation, working on it (adding value to it) and selling it on is an investment. It is a productive activity. 

 

Buying a house, doing nothing to it and waiting for the price to increase due to the actions of others (Government economic policy, local investments, etc.) is speculation. It is an unproductive activity. 

 

I have no idea about Corbyn's living arrangements, but I suspect it falls into the first category. 

Well not surprisingly I disagree with yours. Everyone needs a place to live. I know a bunch of people who have bought houses - some well off, others not so well off but choosing to pay more than rent because - well because it is an investment. For most, it is the single biggest investment they will own. And, no, you do not need to buy it, there are plenty for rent.

Not a single person I know has ever purchased a property without thinking of re-sale value. So stuff like build quality and current condition come into play, but as important are the quality of the public schools, roads/access, public services in that area, neighborhood rules on what can be done to the property etc... all are considered.

 

So it really has nothing in common with buying a cheeseburger or a pair of jeans. Nothing. Comparing disposable goods with property seems daft.

Do you own a home?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are far too many taxes as it is. Most of them are a load of fucking bollocks designed to extract more and more money from people. Sugar tax? Fuck off! They should be getting out of the way of peoples lives, not scheming up new ways to interject themselves in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Boss said:

There are far too many taxes as it is. Most of them are a load of fucking bollocks designed to extract more and more money from people. Sugar tax? Fuck off! They should be getting out of the way of peoples lives, not scheming up new ways to interject themselves in.

I know yeah bring back Pound a Pint, 50p Mitsubishi Turbos and Ciggies for 10p a pop! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Boss said:

There are far too many taxes as it is. Most of them are a load of fucking bollocks designed to extract more and more money from people. Sugar tax? Fuck off! They should be getting out of the way of peoples lives, not scheming up new ways to interject themselves in.

And that’s your opinion. Others disagree. That’s why we have elections. Talking about it like it’s a fact rather than a viewpoint isn’t going to convince anyone, though. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

And that’s your opinion. Others disagree. That’s why we have elections. Talking about it like it’s a fact rather than a viewpoint isn’t going to convince anyone, though. 

 

Absolutely. It's not my intention to present myself as if I'm speaking fact, it's simply my subjective opinion - which has no more weight than anyone else. Then again that should be taken as read. We're all speaking candidly here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...