Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Rate the last TV Show you watched


Guest Numero Veinticinco
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Scott_M said:

 

I thought it was ace until the last episode, where nothing gets tied up.

 

I see it's been renewed for a second season though. 

 

Yeah I wonder if they found out it'd been renewed so had to leave a lot dangling. Loved it though,  the Yakuza just look exactly how you'd imagine them, constantly pissed off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Clem H Fandango said:

History of swear words.

 

Hosted by the great Nicholas Cage makes this series side-splittingly funny. A fucking 8 dicks out of 10 pussies.

 

Cage is brilliant in this. The rest of the "comedians" are hit or miss. Mainly miss. 

 

I enjoyed it, it'd have been better if it was a one off and  just Cage ranting for 1 hour.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NoelM said:

It really lacks Raul Julia and Angelica Houston though. Raul Julia was such a brilliant Gomez.


Be tough to get Raul Julia back. 
 

Obviously can’t say how much Gomez and Morticia are involved / missed as only watched the first episode, I’ve forgotten how lovely Zeta-Jones is. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Carvalho Diablo said:

Did anyone see the first episode of the new series of 24 Hours In Police Custody the other night?

 

Fucking hell, rarely have I been so angry or outraged, I hope someone tracks those 2 cunts down and guts them.

 

Unreal TV.

Yeah it's good.i watched a couple of episodes on 4od one involving a one punch killer and another were a bloke randomly attacks someone in a lift with a fire extinguisher 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Carvalho Diablo said:

Did anyone see the first episode of the new series of 24 Hours In Police Custody the other night?

 

Fucking hell, rarely have I been so angry or outraged, I hope someone tracks those 2 cunts down and guts them.

 

Unreal TV.

Just watched  it

 

Spoilers

 

You can't help bit feel sorry for him,(I can't believe they got rid of the baby) but it was a stupid thing to do(what was he gonna do if he caught them?)

Saying that he just saw red and really should have just got a slap on the wrist. 

Apparently it's created a right stir on social media and there is a go fund me page.

That Di was an utter cunt.

Great show though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/11/2022 at 22:46, manwiththestick said:

Tulsa King.

 

Watched first episode and its enjoyable enough, shades of LillyHammer with Stallone as a New York mob boss being a fish out of water after being sent to start up business out in Tulsa after 25 years in the slammer.

 

Good start. 

Shades? They’ve heavily lifted the plot line but it’s started well. Enjoying this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Friend of the Family on Peacock. It's got a decent cast (Anna Paquin, Colin Hanks, Jake Lacy) and based on a true story about the Broberg family who's friend kidnaps their daughter. I assume this family is pretty well known in the states ( @TheHowieLama ? ) But I've never heard of them. Episode one was pretty decent - 8/10. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Baresi said:

Slow horses season 2 has started. Episode 1 & 2 both out, but I’ll wait for them all to air before starting it. 

 

Good stuff, I really enjoyed the first series and the books are great too. My sister says the next series of Severance is due soon-ish, so think I'll wait until that's all released and get a free trial to watch both.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mudface said:

 

Good stuff, I really enjoyed the first series and the books are great too. My sister says the next series of Severance is due soon-ish, so think I'll wait until that's all released and get a free trial to watch both.

I loved Severance.  Really looking forward to S2.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The English - not really good, but better than I feared after seeing how much the Guardian liked it. 6/10?

 

It starts very ambitious in the first three episodes but then descends into pretentious in the following three parts. The main problem is poor, inconsistent storytelling which does not deliver on early promises and does not make you care or understand the heroes fully,  colourful characters are being piled on to the screen and killed off before they are fully explored, as if to hide narrative shortcomings (look, a Welsh woman is a gang leader). It would have benefited from some expert script doctoring (judging by jumps and what feels like missing parts, some was done, the script was probably even more "ambitious".

Dialogue is, as is often the case now, always forced, "meaningful", "philosophical", "poetic", which after a while starts to grate. Just say a simple, descriptive sentence every once in a while.

 

Directing is particularly irritating after a while, I don't have a more modern reference, but it looks something like the French neo-baroque directors of the late '80s or early '90s would think a (spaghetti, or in this case more of a fish & chips)  western should look like, every shot is carefully composed to feel amazing (and yes, there is a shot of them walking through a poppy field on the Great Plains I've been waiting for ever since the first few carefully colour coordinated images).

 

Ideologically is not that aggressive as we have almost come to expect nowadays, we have seen it all in the American revisionist western of 50-odd years ago, and the male hero is more a good old colonial "noble savage" character than some "woke" reinterpretation ideological criticism would probably (miss)read into it.

 

Onto 1883 now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SasaS said:

The English - not really good, but better than I feared after seeing how much the Guardian liked it. 6/10?

 

It starts very ambitious in the first three episodes but then descends into pretentious in the following three parts. The main problem is poor, inconsistent storytelling which does not deliver on early promises and does not make you care or understand the heroes fully,  colourful characters are being piled on to the screen and killed off before they are fully explored, as if to hide narrative shortcomings (look, a Welsh woman is a gang leader). It would have benefited from some expert script doctoring (judging by jumps and what feels like missing parts, some was done, the script was probably even more "ambitious".

Dialogue is, as is often the case now, always forced, "meaningful", "philosophical", "poetic", which after a while starts to grate. Just say a simple, descriptive sentence every once in a while.

 

Directing is particularly irritating after a while, I don't have a more modern reference, but it looks something like the French neo-baroque directors of the late '80s or early '90s would think a (spaghetti, or in this case more of a fish & chips)  western should look like, every shot is carefully composed to feel amazing (and yes, there is a shot of them walking through a poppy field on the Great Plains I've been waiting for ever since the first few carefully colour coordinated images).

 

Ideologically is not that aggressive as we have almost come to expect nowadays, we have seen it all in the American revisionist western of 50-odd years ago, and the male hero is more a good old colonial "noble savage" character than some "woke" reinterpretation ideological criticism would probably (miss)read into it.

 

Onto 1883 now.

1883 is magnificent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...