Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Boss said:

I can 100% guarantee if there's a Donald Trump blimp portraying him in a good light - as a counter protest to the baby blimp - Khan will not authorise it to be flown. There in lies the rub. 

 

Khan couldn't care less about free speech. He's cares about himself and those sympathetic to his beliefs only. 

No you can’t. You absolutely can’t.  That’s just fucking nonsense and a pathetic argument.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

No you can’t. You absolutely can’t.  That’s just fucking nonsense and a pathetic argument.  

You don't think there's going to be counter protesters on the streets of London going against the anti-Trump crowd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheHowieLama said:

Boss -- you are struggling here mate -- this is a fella that "sorted" a balloon of himself.

In a bikini.

He allowed it because it was after the Trump baby blimp and he knew if he rejected it he'd be exposed as a hypocrite. 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Boss said:

I can 100% guarantee if there's a Donald Trump blimp portraying him in a good light - as a counter protest to the baby blimp - Khan will not authorise it to be flown. Therein lies the rub. 

 

Khan couldn't care less about free speech. He's cares about himself and those sympathetic to his beliefs only. 

 

Why do pro-Trumpers need a blimp? They're already supporting a bag of hot air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boss said:

He allowed it because it was after the Trump baby blimp and he knew if he rejected it he'd be exposed as a hypocrite. 

This is absolute bollocks. Complete fucking nonsense!  You are ascribing things to him you couldn’t possibly know to support your narrative. Complete nonsense. Like RP or DT. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boss said:

I just find it odd that the baby blimp will get it's second outing and nobody has organised a counter protest. 

Maybe because crying that they wouldn’t be allowed and bitching about unfairness would be completely undone if they applied for, and received, permission to fly a blimp of trump and the messiah. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Boss said:

I can 100% guarantee if there's a Donald Trump blimp portraying him in a good light - as a counter protest to the baby blimp - Khan will not authorise it to be flown. Therein lies the rub. 

 

Khan couldn't care less about free speech. He's cares about himself and those sympathetic to his beliefs only. 

Not sure about blimps but there's loads of blerts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Boss said:

I don't see what attacking our biggest ally offers us when we are on the cusp of a no deal Brexit and need to secure trade arrangements with countries outside the EU. 

We need to secure trade deals with the EU, more than anything.  The EU will still be, by far, our biggest trading partner, regardless of what terms we leave on.

 

The USA (especially under the Trump Administration) isn't looking for a partner in the UK: they're looking for a vassal state. It's baffling that there's an overlap between people who support Brexit on the grounds of sovereignty and people who support close ties with Trump. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Boss said:

He sorted it out by authorising it. Self explanatory. His refusal would've stopped it from happening. Hence he had an active role.

If you witnessed a granny getting mugged and you didn't intervene to stop it, do you agree that you should be charged as the criminal mastermind who "sorted out" the mugging?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baffled with the argument about how we should be placating him because there's trade deals to be struck and all that. This is Donald Trump, he can do 360 degree turnarounds in the space of one Tweet. 

 

It's also mad to think any trade deal, under any circumstances, would be anything other than weighted completely in his and their favour. The guy has spent his career not paying suppliers and laughing about it down the phone. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...