Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Boss said:

I don't see what attacking our biggest ally offers us when we are on the cusp of a no deal Brexit and need to secure trade arrangements with countries outside the EU. 

We need to secure trade deals with the EU, more than anything.  The EU will still be, by far, our biggest trading partner, regardless of what terms we leave on.

 

The USA (especially under the Trump Administration) isn't looking for a partner in the UK: they're looking for a vassal state. It's baffling that there's an overlap between people who support Brexit on the grounds of sovereignty and people who support close ties with Trump. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Boss said:

He sorted it out by authorising it. Self explanatory. His refusal would've stopped it from happening. Hence he had an active role.

If you witnessed a granny getting mugged and you didn't intervene to stop it, do you agree that you should be charged as the criminal mastermind who "sorted out" the mugging?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baffled with the argument about how we should be placating him because there's trade deals to be struck and all that. This is Donald Trump, he can do 360 degree turnarounds in the space of one Tweet. 

 

It's also mad to think any trade deal, under any circumstances, would be anything other than weighted completely in his and their favour. The guy has spent his career not paying suppliers and laughing about it down the phone. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, viRdjil said:

@Boss so was he an imbecile in your eyes, because he didn’t use his power to intervene and stop the protest from happening? I’ve given you an out here.

No. He's an imbecile because I generally think he's an imbecile. The crime figures in London during his stewardship have increased across the board and I don't think he did a good job in the wake of the terror attacks either. His comments about the attacks just being part and parcel of living in a major city were in very poor taste.

 

He seems to be one of these people that's more concerned with moralising his virtues and attacking detractors rather than actually doing his job and making sure the city prospers. He takes no ownership of any of the cities problems and instead just chooses to point the finger at the Tories rather than doing anything about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Boss said:

No. He's an imbecile because I generally think he's an imbecile. The crime figures in London during his stewardship have increased across the board and I don't think he did a good job in the wake of the terror attacks either. His comments about the attacks just being part and parcel of living in a major city were in very poor taste.

 

He seems to be one of these people that's more concerned with moralising his virtues and attacking detractors rather than actually doing his job and making sure the city prospers. He takes no ownership of any of the cities problems and instead just chooses to point the finger at the Tories rather than doing anything about it. 

Okay, so nothing to do with the blimp... You should’ve just said that, no? As opposed to making up a lie about him organising the protest?

 

I’m not a big fan of his either. A real centrist, #FBPE type... He also came out in support of Owen Smith. However I don’t think think it’s fair to accuse him of something he didn’t do, only to attack him for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, viRdjil said:

Okay, so nothing to do with the blimp... You should’ve just said that, no? As opposed to making up a lie about him organising the protest?

 

I’m not a big fan of his either. A real centrist, #FBPE type... He also came out in support of Owen Smith. However I don’t think think it’s fair to accuse him of something he didn’t do, only to attack him for it.

Okay, I understand your point of view and accept that my comments might've painted Khan in a false light. Apologies for calling your point of view nonsense on the other page. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boss said:

Okay, I understand your point of view and accept that my comments might've painted Khan in a false light. Apologies for calling your point of view nonsense on the other page. 

Happy to put it behind us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

He also said that the NHS would be in the table for any future trade deal.  Obviously remaining in the EU prevents that so JC will be backing remain now! 

That could have a significant impact on Brexit, the Tory leadership race and any election. The fear that a US trade deal will spell the end of the NHS will cause a lot of people to think twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the difference between the yanks getting their grubby little mits on the NHS and Virgin care?

 

Baffled by this concept that the big bad Americans are about to tear up our socialist paradise.

 

G4S was claiming taxpayers' money for ankle tagging prisoners who'd been dead for months. Its prisons are fucked. Carilian collapsed, Capita is on its arse, the railway network is fucked. 

 

How pretty typical of the British public to allow all this to go on under their noses while berrating Corbyn for something they read somewhere while at the same time feeling sorry for Theresa May's tears or wishing David Miliband was Labour leader, but then share a hashtag from Owen Jones about one comment from this senile old bastard. 

 

Yeah let's mobilise kids, tbose online petitions won't sign themselves.

 

Nation of lazy, stupid Bastards.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

What's the difference between the yanks getting their grubby little mits on the NHS and Virgin care?

 

Baffled by this concept that the big bad Americans are about to tear up our socialist paradise.

 

G4S was claiming taxpayers' money for ankle tagging prisoners who'd been dead for months. Its prisons are fucked. Carilian collapsed, Capita is on its arse, the railway network is fucked. 

 

How pretty typical of the British public to allow all this to go on under their noses while berrating Corbyn for something they read somewhere while at the same time feeling sorry for Theresa May's tears or wishing David Miliband was Labour leader, but then share a hashtag from Owen Jones about one comment from this senile old bastard. 

 

Yeah let's mobilise kids, tbose online petitions won't sign themselves.

 

Nation of lazy, stupid Bastards.

Brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...