Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

*Shakes head* Everton again.


Fugitive

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Chris Sutton is unimpressed by Fatty throwing the players under the bus.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/60829600

 

He's right. Lampard has some nerve questioning players like has when he and his cabal actively worked to get several Chelsea managers sacked.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The context: a memorial service in London, a few years ago, for Eric Sykes (he was a comedian and writer, m'lud). The speaker was Bill Kenwright. All the other speakers had focused on their memories of the man. Good old Bill decided to use his allotted time to make jokes about Liverpool being knocked out of the FA Cup a few days before. Worra wanker. And they hold him up as the 'classy' side of the club!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

Usmanov genuinely looks evil. I'm gutted they had a good start to the season,that's saved them this year the bastards.

He's supposed to be an utter cunt, makes Abramovich look like cuddly in comparison. He's also apparently very litigious, but Craig Murray's managed to get away with some blog articles about him- https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/category/usmanov/

 

Particularly- https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2007/09/alisher_usmanov/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, gkmacca said:

The context: a memorial service in London, a few years ago, for Eric Sykes (he was a comedian and writer, m'lud). The speaker was Bill Kenwright. All the other speakers had focused on their memories of the man. Good old Bill decided to use his allotted time to make jokes about Liverpool being knocked out of the FA Cup a few days before. Worra wanker. And they hold him up as the 'classy' side of the club!

I remember he was on question of sport about 20 years ago roundabout the time Rooney had started in their first team. 

 

He wore an Everton scarf and every time he was asked to answer a question he shoehorned Everton into it. The round where you have to identify the athlete/sportsman there was some black sprinter and he said "oh I don't think it's Wayne rooney is it?".

 

Yet they go into a homicidal rage about Sam Quek supporting Liverpool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mudface said:

He's supposed to be an utter cunt, makes Abramovich look like cuddly in comparison. He's also apparently very litigious, but Craig Murray's managed to get away with some blog articles about him- https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/category/usmanov/

 

Particularly- https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2007/09/alisher_usmanov/

The only way to 'get away with' writing about these guys is to tell the truth. It's only libel when it's not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Chocoholic said:

The only way to 'get away with' writing about these guys is to tell the truth. It's only libel when it's not true.

Trouble is that it costs to defend yourself- one of Trump's main tactics is to tie people up in court cases that they can't afford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Chocoholic said:

The only way to 'get away with' writing about these guys is to tell the truth. It's only libel when it's not true.

Some years ago, whilst working on a local paper, I wrote a story on a certain local MP and a businessman he has a close relationship with.

It all stood up. It was all true. They complained. And my boss had to take me to one side and say she’d been told by her boss that the company, who were broke, had cancelled their insurance for legal cases*. 
So my boss’s boss immediately caved, without even asking if the story was true, and agreed to pay them a wad of cash to drop the case. 
Just because something is true doesn’t mean it’ll get published. 
*Its vaguely more complicated than that, but I can’t go into the details for obvious reasons. 
 

(A few years later an almost identical story appeared in The Times about the same MP and his pal. Hey Ho!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...