Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Keir Starmer


rb14
 Share

Recommended Posts

Pretty appalling this. I understand he feels he needs to ape Blair and New Labour but simply choosing to rollover every nasty Tory policy for fear of offending the core Tory vote and the media will just result in Labour becoming the Tory party in government. What next from Starmer? He'll be outlining a new Labour policy of locating gunboats in the channel and firing on those pesky immigrants?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Starmers core support in the media are turning against him, as Peter Oborne alludes to in his tweet.

 

Both Steve Richards and John Harris are/were center left Starmer supporters. The article by Harris in tomorrows Guardian is the third article critical of Starmer by former supporters in as many days. Its an excellent piece of writing and it's bang on the button.

 

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/16/labour-changes-little-power-social-forces-councillors-climate?s=09

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Report in the Financial Times says 1.5 million kids affected by the 2 child cap. Capital gains, Corperation and top rate of income tax will remain untouched so Labour will continue to protect the wealthiest. 

 

 

 

 

 

Caroline Lucas is right.

 

Starmers thrown 1.5 million kids under the bus to protect the wealth of the super rich. Its a cunts trick.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that suggesting rich people have a little less so that people can afford food and shelter is seen as politic suicide shows you how much influence these self serving cunts and their media lackeys have.

 

 

It's the same with inheritance tax, the Tories are going to abolish it, it will get excessive media coverage which will all be negative, yet it effects less than 4% of the population. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lovely Susie Reid is taking no prisoners on Labour's shelving of the two child benefit pledge this morning. Yvette Cooper didn't know whether she was coming or going (and Coopers one of Labours better performers). Reid explains (Cooper didn't have the figures) that out of the 1 5 million kids affected half a million are to parents in work. Then asks Cooper to remind us of Starmers five so called missions  (Cooper struggled) then Reid remarked they are like a kite in the wind anyway.  Brutal.

 

Labour are now to the right of former Conservative centrist ministers on the issue. Here's Amber Rudd from a few years ago.

 

https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/amber-rudd-scraps-extension-of-twochild-benefit-cap-after-winning-cash-battle-with-chancellor

 

 

Here's economist Richard Murphy on Starmers fiscal plans announced yesterday. Fair to say he was not impressed.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Anubis said:

On the praiseworthy side for Labour, Khan is introducing free school meals for primary school kids in London in September. Hats off to him for that.

 

Yeah good on Khan. Welsh Labour have dropped free out of school meals this summer. Not good by Drakeford. Not good at all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can they not get on the front foot over the economy?

"Poverty is through the roof in a rich country. Even people in work are struggling to pay the rent, pay the bills, feed their kids and heat their homes. That's because 13 years of these cunts have fucked everything up. Vote for us and we'll do something different."

 

Come out swinging, you shithouse!

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

starmer is being given a lot of leeway because most sensible people know that the alternative, another 5 years of these monstrous cunts,is almost unthinkable.

 

He wasn't being given a lot of leeway from Susie Reed this morning. Their have been three negative articles on him by previous supporters these past few days. If Starmer is not prepared to offer help or hope to the people the Labour were created to represent and only take advice from the Murdochs/Spectator/Davos types he's going to be left with no leeway at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

How can they not get on the front foot over the economy?

"Poverty is through the roof in a rich country. Even people in work are struggling to pay the rent, pay the bills, feed their kids and heat their homes. That's because 13 years of these cunts have fucked everything up. Vote for us and we'll do something different."

 

Come out swinging, you shithouse!

 

It's the same spiel as Cameron and truss came out with. 

 

We can't fix our problems without growing the economy.

 

The economy doesn't need growing it needs rebalancing. 

 

It's all going very Hilary Clinton this shit. They're leaving a gaping hole once again for the far right.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

 

It's the same spiel as Cameron and truss came out with. 

 

We can't fix our problems without growing the economy.

 

The economy doesn't need growing it needs rebalancing. 

 

It's all going very Hilary Clinton this shit. They're leaving a gaping hole once again for the far right.

 

Your last sentence is my main worry (although I agree with the others) we've seen it across Europe. If people feel they have no-one to speak for them it can turn toxic very quickly.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

He wasn't being given a lot of leeway from Susie Reed this morning. Their have been three negative articles on him by previous supporters these past few days. If Starmer is not prepared to offer help or hope to the people the Labour were created to represent and only take advice from the Murdochs/Spectator/Davos types he's going to be left with no leeway at all.

more in the sense that he knows most labour supporters,will still vote labour,even if they are not particually impressed,because the alternative is much worse.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a bit of Reeds interview with Yvette Cooper this morning. Unfortunately for Cooper it didn't get any easier, Reed was just warming up. 

 

 

 

As for Starmer, it's every weekend he takes a lurch to the right and ditches another pledge. Last week it was the environment the week before something else. This 'i kissed a tory and we're all Tories now' speil is relentless. He was praising Margaret Thatcher the week before that. Between him Reeves and Streeting it's non stop. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

more in the sense that he knows most labour supporters,will still vote labour,even if they are not particually impressed,because the alternative is much worse.  

 

The alternative is begining to look very much the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the families affected more than half are in work. So the rhetoric of being on the side of hard working families doesn't stand here.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/apr/06/more-than-1m-children-growing-up-in-poverty-under-two-child-benefits-limit?s=09

 

 

Here's Starmer a few years ago. "Shocking". Jonathan Ashworth called it "heinous" only last month.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...