Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Keir Starmer


rb14
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Because the Labour friends of Israel, who many believe are linked and funded by the Israeli government are imo having a negative impact on the Labour Party.

 

Oh well, if many people believe it, it must be true.

 

Looking forward to this logic being applied universally in future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

Oh well, if many people believe it, it must be true.

 

Looking forward to this logic being applied universally in future.

 

Nothing against him personally but Israel or any other country shouldn't have such a big influence in our political parties and Israel are all over the Labour Party. Look at the state of American politics. Its not healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

How is his husband's nationality of any relevance, unless you're a massive racist?

The only relevance here is that his husband is associated with the IDF and, by association, enjoys seeing the deaths of innocent children. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always a point to liberalism, not least because Lib Dems can beat the Tories in places where Labour can't, like Somerton and Frome last year, a by-election where Labour lost its deposit, which I of course didn't crow about at the time, because that's just what happens when voters unite behind one anti-Tory candidate, and I'm not a pathetic trolling piece of excrement that should be flushed down the nearest bog.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Strontium said:

Always a point to liberalism, not least because Lib Dems can beat the Tories in places where Labour can't, like Somerton and Frome last year, a by-election where Labour lost its deposit, which I of course didn't crow about at the time, because that's just what happens when voters unite behind one anti-Tory candidate, and I'm not a pathetic trolling piece of excrement that should be flushed down the nearest bog.

 

Do you genuinely believe this? Seriously? No, seriously? 

 

a4dc8725b58b992673e1c9430e346ed9.gif

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Strontium said:

Always a point to liberalism, not least because Lib Dems can beat the Tories in places where Labour can't, like Somerton and Frome last year, a by-election where Labour lost its deposit, which I of course didn't crow about at the time, because that's just what happens when voters unite behind one anti-Tory candidate, and I'm not a pathetic trolling piece of excrement that should be flushed down the nearest bog.


no, you’re just a horrible genocide advocating rat.

 

 

  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Do you genuinely believe this? Seriously? No, seriously?

 

It is a matter of fact that I didn't once mention Labour losing its deposit last year in the by-election that the Lib Dems won. A person who was intent on trolling Labour supporters would have done so, without question.

 

On the other hand, Nelly "Jew-hating piece of vermin" Freeloader has already mentioned the Lib Dems losing theirs in identical circumstances three times today.

 

You either don't know what a troll is, or you're just too oblivious to notice.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Strontium said:

 

It is a matter of fact that I didn't once mention Labour losing its deposit last year in the by-election that the Lib Dems won. A person who was intent on trolling Labour supporters would have done so, without question.

 

On the other hand, Nelly "Jew-hating piece of vermin" Freeloader has already mentioned the Lib Dems losing theirs in identical circumstances three times today.

 

You either don't know what a troll is, or you're just too oblivious to notice.

 

 

Nelly hates Jews because the Lib Dems lost their deposits in two bi-elections? I can't fucking keep up me. 

 

Some might suggest that given your history of posts about Muslims that you're a "Muslim hating piece of vermin"

 

Food for thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Nelly hates Jews because the Lib Dems lost their deposits in two bi-elections? I can't fucking keep up me. 

 

Some might suggest that given your history of posts about Muslims that you're a "Muslim hating piece of vermin"

 

Food for thought. 

 

He's just called me a rat. I'd use the word "trope", but you neg me every time* I do. Yay free speech.

 

Some people can suggest whatever they want, and some people would be talking complete and utter bollocks without any basis in fact.


Still, congratulations on yet again being the useful idiot for the very worst elements of this forum.

 

 

 

 

 

*not every time, just six occasions - so far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Strontium said:

 

He's just called me a rat. I'd use the word "trope", but you neg me every time I do. Yay free speech.

 

Some people can suggest whatever they want, and some people would be talking complete and utter bollocks without any basis in fact.


Still, congratulations on yet again being the useful idiot for the very worst elements of this forum.

 

That's a lie and I've even suggested on the Israel thread that people are better off not using that term in reference to Zionists. But it's not like you to invent stuff eh? 

 

You called him 'vermin' by the way. Just saying. 

 

You most certainly have posted negative things about Muslims you even managed to do so on the India thread in the last 24 hours although I'm sure you'll pretend that you weren't having a dig at them. 

 

I'm not defending Nelly here, that's for you two to sort out but you suggesting you're not a troll is fucking hilarious. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Arniepie said:

thought they had a pact in certain seats?.

 

that gone out the window?

 

There's no formal pact, nothing like it. There is an unspoken understanding that each party will soft pedal in by-elections where the other has a much better chance of beating the Tories.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

You most certainly have posted negative things about Muslims you even managed to do so on the India thread in the last 24 hours although I'm sure you'll pretend that you weren't having a dig at them. 

 

I'm not defending Nelly here, that's for you two to sort out but you suggesting you're not a troll is fucking hilarious. 

 

I freely admit to having posted negative things about SOME Muslims. Chiefly the ones who fly planes into buildings, bomb trains, rape and murder people at peace festivals, and that sort of thing. This doesn't make a person an anti-Muslim bigot. Anyone decent would be appalled by such acts of depravity.

 

You're "not defending Nelly" but you did rep 2/3 of his posts crowing about Lib Dems losing their deposits. Well okay then.

 

If I post something which is deliberately intended to wind people up, then you can call me a troll. Until then...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Strontium said:

If I post something which is deliberately intended to wind people up, then you can call me a troll. Until then...

 

Quote

I think you're forgetting Rule 1 of historical revisionism - nothing is ever the fault of Muslims.

 

This was you yesterday, no?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

I freely admit to having posted negative things about SOME Muslims. Chiefly the ones who fly planes into buildings, bomb trains, rape and murder people at peace festivals, and that sort of thing. This doesn't make a person an anti-Muslim bigot. Anyone decent would be appalled by such acts of depravity.

 

You're "not defending Nelly" but you did rep 2/3 of his posts crowing about Lib Dems losing their deposits. Well okay then.

 

If I post something which is deliberately intended to wind people up, then you can call me a troll. Until then...


Ill rep whoever I want. So you’ve never said things like “religion of peace” ? 
 

Ok. Must have dreamt all that. 
 

Has anyone condemned Jews as a whole? Or just the ones slaughtering or justifying the slaughter? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

This was you yesterday, no?

 

Yes, and?

 

There's a difference between having a view people might disagree with, and posting things with the specific purpose of winding other people up.

 

In the future I'll more than likely post a lot more things you disagree with. I can assure you that me having an opinion on something is not intended as a provocation.

 

Before what is (hopefully) the last post I have to make about this, let me appreciate the irony that I am regularly copping abuse for not expressing an opinion on certain things.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Ill rep whoever I want. So you’ve never said things like “religion of peace” ? 
 

Ok. Must have dreamt all that. 

 

You can indeed rep whoever you want, and I can interpret that as support if I want.

 

Apparently I used the term "religion of peace" in November 2015, in the wake of the Bataclan massacre. Not sure what the contention is here though, I've never professed to be a fan of religions as a general rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

Yes, and?

 

There's a difference between having a view people might disagree with, and posting things with the specific purpose of winding other people up.

 

In the future I'll more than likely post a lot more things you disagree with. I can assure you that me having an opinion on something is not intended as a provocation.

 

Before what is (hopefully) the last post I have to make about this, let me appreciate the irony that I am regularly copping abuse for not expressing an opinion on certain things.

 

Yet you still continue to make sly negs and sly comments on other threads..... Grow up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...