Keir Starmer

[Numero Veinticinco]

38 minutes ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

Didn’t she get called out for being a fraud?

 

Those like her, are all self proclaimed political commentators/analysts. When reality they are all chancers. 

 

 

Yeah, she’s not a journalist or anything, just a grifter with a Twitter handle. Spewing nonsense. The sorts of stuff you see get parroted on here sometimes, usually parroted by others first. 

[Bjornebye]

20 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Yeah, she’s not a journalist or anything, just a grifter with a Twitter handle. Spewing nonsense. The sorts of stuff you see get parroted on here sometimes, usually parroted by others first. 

Often by you....

[Trumo]

6 hours ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

Don’t we need to change the thread title to “Should Stermer remain as the Labour Leader?”

 

 

Starmer can go in the Stermer.

[Numero Veinticinco]

25 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Often by you....

Any examples? 

[Bjornebye]

Just now, Numero Veinticinco said:

Any examples? 

I was half joking mate but don't go making out like everyone else is a parrot and you're always spot on. 

[Numero Veinticinco]

Just now, Bjornebye said:

I was half joking mate but don't go making out like everyone else is a parrot and you're always spot on. 

I’m not making out as if everyone else is a parrot, I’m saying there’s some on here that copy it practically verbatim then pass it off as their view. At least some, like Gnasher, don’t even put that much effort in now and just post the tweet in place of their own opinion. Though I am actually quite often spot on; avoiding topics you know nothing about (for me, that’s most things) instead of having an opinion on every *clap* fucking *clap* thing has that benefit. 
 

For example, you’ll notice that my lack of saying anything of note on the medical side of the pandemic. You’ll see that I didn’t become an overnight expert. Why? I know fuck all about any of that, I didn’t spend years getting a doctorate in those subjects, and I don’t have years of professional experience in those areas, so I didn’t comment much outside of questions. It didn’t stop a few, very loud, very silly twunts screaming through all the threads. Just in the same way it doesn’t stop some going through political threads dribbling all over the place with stuff that I read elsewhere or in a linked tweet earlier on. 

 

Me criticising that isn’t placing myself as the fount of all knowledge on everything, I’m not and stay away from pretending I am, it’s criticising those few on here that ‘sometimes’ do it. Anyway, where is TK? 

[Bjornebye]

9 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I’m not making out as if everyone else is a parrot, I’m saying there’s some on here that copy it practically verbatim then pass it off as their view. At least some, like Gnasher, don’t even put that much effort in now and just post the tweet in place of their own opinion. Though I am actually quite often spot on; avoiding topics you know nothing about (for me, that’s most things) instead of having an opinion on every *clap* fucking *clap* thing has that benefit. 
 

For example, you’ll notice that my lack of saying anything of note on the medical side of the pandemic. You’ll see that I didn’t become an overnight expert. Why? I know fuck all about any of that, I didn’t spend years getting a doctorate in those subjects, and I don’t have years of professional experience in those areas, so I didn’t comment much outside of questions. It didn’t stop a few, very loud, very silly twunts screaming through all the threads. Just in the same way it doesn’t stop some going through political threads dribbling all over the place with stuff that I read elsewhere or in a linked tweet earlier on. 

 

Me criticising that isn’t placing myself as the fount of all knowledge on everything, I’m not and stay away from pretending I am, it’s criticising those few on here that ‘sometimes’ do it. Anyway, where is TK? 

Glad we cleared that up Dr. 

[Jairzinho]

[Numero Veinticinco]

2 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

I actually can't believe he once said that same thing and now I've parroted it. I've been caught out. 

[Jairzinho]

Just now, Numero Veinticinco said:

I actually can't believe he once said that same thing and now I've parroted it. Now I've been caught out. 

You're too kind. The cunt has clearly copied you.

[Numero Veinticinco]

15 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

You're too kind. The cunt has clearly copied you.

I mean, I didn't want to say anything...

[Anubis]

The beard on that statue is too much. I’ve never seen Derek Jacobi with a beard that thick.

[Gnasher]

2 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I’m not making out as if everyone else is a parrot, I’m saying there’s some on here that copy it practically verbatim then pass it off as their view. At least some, like Gnasher, don’t even put that much effort in now and just post the tweet in place of their own opinion. Though I am actually quite often spot on; avoiding topics you know nothing about (for me, that’s most things) instead of having an opinion on every *clap* fucking *clap* thing has that benefit. 
 

For example, you’ll notice that my lack of saying anything of note on the medical side of the pandemic. You’ll see that I didn’t become an overnight expert. Why? I know fuck all about any of that, I didn’t spend years getting a doctorate in those subjects, and I don’t have years of professional experience in those areas, so I didn’t comment much outside of questions. It didn’t stop a few, very loud, very silly twunts screaming through all the threads. Just in the same way it doesn’t stop some going through political threads dribbling all over the place with stuff that I read elsewhere or in a linked tweet earlier on. 

 

Me criticising that isn’t placing myself as the fount of all knowledge on everything, I’m not and stay away from pretending I am, it’s criticising those few on here that ‘sometimes’ do it. Anyway, where is TK? 

 

Bollocks. The conversation was on Dan Hodges (whos a very well paid columist for the mail) talking nonsense about Starmer and you drew comparisons with someone from the left (suprise suprise) who no cunt has heard of never mind parroted because she doesn't share your strange little obsession with Keir Starmer.

 

As for her asking for money, A, I'd think giving is not compulsory and B; she possibly needs to ask because she is not as wealthy and privileged as Dan fucking Hodges.

 

Edit; just had a look at her twitter page; this is a very recent post. Anyone annoyed by this?

 

 

[Gnasher]

1 hour ago, Jairzinho said:

You're too kind. The cunt has clearly copied you.

You can fuck off as well.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

That Rachael Swindon is just a grifter with a Twitter handle, spewing nonsense.

[Gnasher]

Just now, AngryOfTuebrook said:

That Rachael Swindon is just a grifter with a Twitter handle, spewing nonsense.

I'd never heard of her. I've heard of Dan Hodges, unfortunately.

[Numero Veinticinco]

1 minute ago, Gnasher said:

 

Bollocks. The conversation was on Dan Hodges (whos a very well paid columist for the mail) talking nonsense about Starmer and you drew comparisons with someone from the left (suprise suprise) who no cunt has heard of never mind parroted because she doesn't share your strange little obsession with Keir Starmer.

 

As for her asking for money, A, I'd think giving is not compulsory and B; she possibly needs to ask because she is not as wealthy and privileged as Dan fucking Hodges.

Interesting defence of somebody you’ve never heard of. Just like when I mentioned her before and it set you off, calling me right wing. Again. Are you a donator? 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Just now, Gnasher said:

I'd never heard of her. I've heard of Dan Hodges, unfortunately.

I'd never really heard of her until a few years ago, when right-wing weirdos (rather than arguing with the substance of what she was tweeting or even pointing out, as NV says, that she's a re-tweeter who doesn't even claim to be a journalist) bizarrely started pretending that she was just a front for her husband - presumably because re-tweeting is too strenuous for her feeble lady-brain.

[Numero Veinticinco]

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I'd never really heard of her until a few years ago, when right-wing weirdos (rather than arguing with the substance of what she was tweeting or even pointing out, as NV says, that she's a re-tweeter who doesn't even claim to be a journalist) bizarrely started pretending that she was just a front for her husband - presumably because re-tweeting is too strenuous for her feeble lady-brain.

I’d missed all that. If some guy was going to make a parody account ‘Rachael *from* Swindon’ would have been perfect though. 

[Gnasher]

Just now, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I'd never really heard of her until a few years ago, when right-wing weirdos (rather than arguing with the substance of what she was tweeting or even pointing out, as NV says, that she's a re-tweeter who doesn't even claim to be a journalist) bizarrely started pretending that she was just a front for her husband - presumably because re-tweeting is too strenuous for her feeble lady-brain.

I honestly don't know Angry. I just went on her twitter page and it seemed OKish, a lot of campaigning type stuff like the tweet about the governments treatment of the disabled, followed by some rubbish about Starmer or Keith as she childishly calls him. I can only guess why someone would get annoyed over it tbh.

[Gnasher]

9 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Interesting defence of somebody you’ve never heard of. Just like when I mentioned her before and it set you off, calling me right wing. Again. Are you a donator? 

No but now you've brought her to my attention I might retweet some of the random shit she posts about your Guru just for the sake off it.

[Numero Veinticinco]

Just now, Gnasher said:

No but now you've brought her to my attention I might retweet some of the random shit she posts about your Guru just for the sake off it.

You’ve posted directly under posts about her more than once, the idea you’ve never heard of her is hilarious. You’re her target audience, so I’m sure she’ll be thankful for another one to add to her tens of thousands of people who have never heard of her. 

[Gnasher]

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

You’ve posted directly under posts about her more than once, the idea you’ve never heard of her is hilarious. You’re her target audience, so I’m sure she’ll be thankful for another one to add to her tens of thousands of people who have never heard of her. 

Why would I deny hearing of her? She's obviously left wing hence your fume. 

[Numero Veinticinco]

3 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Why would I deny hearing of her? She's obviously left wing hence your fume. 

Yeah, that’s why. Because I’m a right winger, right? I’ve no idea why you’re pretending you don’t know her, having replied to posts on here about her, but it doesn’t really matter; she’s a grifter and has been called out on here as such before Starmer was ever my ‘guru’. 

 

 

[Gnasher]

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Yeah, that’s why. Because I’m a right winger, right? I’ve no idea why you’re pretending you don’t know her, having replied to posts on here about her, but it doesn’t really matter; she’s a grifter and has been called out on here as such before Starmer was ever my ‘guru’. 

 

 

I've just looked at her feed and see little reason to even discuss her. Some fair links but the rest is a mishmash.