Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

 

 

Far right thugs attack TUC backed socialist bookshop

————————————————————————————-

 

Bookmarks in central London, a socialist bookshop and also the TUC’s official bookseller, was attacked on Saturday (4 August) by around a dozen far right supporters.

 

Some carried placards reading “British Bolshevik Cult” and one of them wore a Trump Mask. Books and magazines were ripped and torn, with displays wrecked.

 

A Bookmarks staff member said,

 

“Books on Islamophobia were ridiculed and thrown around. They chanted about Muslims and paedophilia, and called us traitors. While not mentioning Tommy Robinson the links are there to see.”

 

The far right activists also shouted about Corbyn and anti-semitism and then took Abram Leon’s “The Jewish Question” off the shelf holding it aloft as proof of the anti-semitism of the left.

 

The attackers also make threats to return and “show what they can do”.

 

Michael Bradley from Stand up to Racism said:

 

“Luckily no one was hurt this time, but this is a sinister development that indicates the growing confidence of the far right who feel they can attack a bookshop in central London in broad daylight. Attacking a bookshop also exposes their claims to be defenders of free speech as hollow.”

 

 

http://www.standuptoracism.org.uk/press-release-far-right-thugs-attack-tuc-backed-socialist-bookshop/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

A far-right protest against censorship of the conspiracy theory website Infowars took place in central London on Saturday at which protesters were seen with the same placards. Others wore “Make Britain Great Again” caps

 

https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/05/far-right-protesters-ransack-socialist-bookshop-bookmarks-in-london?CMP=share_btn_tw&__twitter_impression=true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All they'd have to do is prove it because if he said that, he'd probably be done. You can't refer to a Jewish MP as 'The Member for Tel-Aviv' and expect to get away with it.

It's close to the knuckle. But, I wouldn't say that it's automatically antisemitic to imply that an MP who is a high up in LFI could have their loyalty scrutinised because of that membership, rather than their religion/ethnicity.

 

Either way, as there appears to be no evidence of this whatsoever, I'd imagine it'll be abandoned quickly and they'll move onto the next tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's close to the knuckle. But, I wouldn't say that it's automatically antisemitic to imply that an MP who is a high up in LFI could have their loyalty scrutinised because of that membership, rather than their religion/ethnicity.

 

Either way, as there appears to be no evidence of this whatsoever, I'd imagine it'll be abandoned quickly and they'll move onto the next tactic.

There's two things in there. One is an accusation of dual loyalties - more serious than it sounds, and precedent calls for his dismissal - and the very dicey use of terms in a period that is very tense would be fucking idiotic. I think he'd rightly have to step down if it were true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Chris Morris needs to do an equivalent of Four Lions for some of the defending free speech hating the Muslim mob.

 

They only went and posted a video on YouTube of their day out but quickly removed it. There is a video of the same divs a longer one of them outside the BBC earlier that is still online *if it's them*

 

 

 

Dj2_Ut_Er_Ww_AEt2_Uy.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Netanyahu is antisemitic, according to IHRA definitions

Posted on 05/08/2018

World leaders have been criticised for sharing a platform with known antisemite, Benjamin Netanyahu.

 

Donald Trump, Angela Merkel and Theresa May have all come under fire for meeting the notorious Jew-hater and prime minister of Israel.

 

The Israeli Prime Minister, self-styled as ‘Bibi’ has become notorious worldwide for Jew-baiting, racist stereotyping and Holocaust minimisation.

 

In her most scathing teshuva yet, Rabbi Geoffrey Cohen denounced Netanyahu as a racist. “Several times in the last year, Bibi has egregiously flouted the IHRA examples of antisemitism. Any world leader who meets with this man is guilty of racism by association.”

 

Among the definitions given by International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance is “denying the facts of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of Nazi Germany and its supporters.” In 2015, Netanyahu famously claimed that Hitler didn’t really want to murder the Jews, but only did it because the Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem told him to, contradicting the facts of the Shoah and minimising the Nazis’ guilt.

 

Only last month, the Yad VaShem condemned Netanyahu after he absolved Poland of any guilt as part of a trade and recognition deal. In a statement, Netanyahu gave support to Poland with their law that made it illegal to talk about Polish concentration camps or Polish complicity in the Holocaust, punishable by three years in jail. He denied Polish complicity and even minimised their pogroms, in a statement so egregiously untrue that even Naftali Bennett condemned it.

 

Because of Netanyahu’s record for Holocaust denial, every world leader who has met with him has been deemed to share his unconscionable views. “When will Theresa May resign?” asked Rabbi Geoffrey, in a statement backed by religious leaders from Slough, Milton Keynes and Inverness.

 

Another of the IHRA definitions that Netanyahu has serially flouted has been “accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel than to their own nations.” Indeed, Netanyahu has repeatedly insisted that Jews have no place in Europe. After the Charlie Hebdo attacks in 2015, Bibi told French Jews to “come to their real home” in Israel. In the same year, after a sickening attack on a synagogue in Denmark, Netanyahu repeated his claim that Jews really belonged in Israel.

 

At the time, religious leaders on the continent criticised Netanyahu for playing games in the build-up to an election. Rabbi Geoffrey was among them, having said “it is now asur for anyone to look Netanyahu in the eye without spitting on him.” Since then, Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron and Theresa May have all met with Bibi and none of them spat on his face. This has prompted serious questions in the community about whether these premiers really hate Jews.

 

Netanyahu has hit back at these accusations. “OK I may have broken a couple of the IHRA examples, but they’re only guidelines and I didn’t break all of them. For example, I never called for the killing of Jews in the name of an extremist view of religion,” Netanyahu said at an IDF recruitment drive in the south Hebron hills.

 

“Also, I never suggested that Israel was a racist endeavour. I wouldn’t say that we would maintain a Jewish majority even if it meant abusing human rights. That wasn’t me. That was my justice minister, Ayelet Shaked. So there.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's close to the knuckle. But, I wouldn't say that it's automatically antisemitic to imply that an MP who is a high up in LFI could have their loyalty scrutinised because of that membership, rather than their religion/ethnicity.

 

Either way, as there appears to be no evidence of this whatsoever, I'd imagine it'll be abandoned quickly and they'll move onto the next tactic.

Nah, just a joke. FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if her loyalties are actually split? I mean, it’s hardly an outrageous accusation.

 

But, yeah - unsourced, daily mail - I’ll write this one off as ‘complete and utter bollocks’

It's a fair point. We argue that Tories don't act in the interests of the electorate because of their memberships and vested interests outside of the party political system.

 

But when you make an entirely possible suggestion that a fervently pro-Israel LFI high-up who has made sickening comments about Palestinians might have one eye elsewhere when carrying out her political work.....ANTISEMITE!

 

Horrendous crying wolf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one hand it's claimed that opposition to Israel has nothing to do with the Jews, on the other hand a person is claimed to have loyalties to Israel simply because they are Jewish.

 

Make your minds up, anti-semites.

It has fuck all to do with her being Jewish, you snivelling gobshite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...