Keir Starmer

[sir roger]

The red wall morons have gone, with Johnson, every one of the Tory mps in those areas is already planning for new jobs.

 

I reckon the vast majority of the population of the UK will be watching pictures from Israel and Gaza with horror and will be baffled why exactly politicians would not want to champion a ceasefire. A few Tory newspaper headlines won't change that ( I note the Express front page today is far more conciliatory about Gaza than previously )

[Scooby Dudek]

8 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

 

 

He might change his mind now the focus group have spoken.

7 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

I think at this any stage, any murmur of support for Palestine will see him getting both barrels from the Tories and their lackeys in the media.

Not to mention those red wall morons. 

 

Or then again, best wait for Murdoch to tell him what he should think.

[Arniepie]

The thousands calling for a ceasefire and peace deserve better than abuse and belittlement | Aditya Chakrabortty | The Guardian

[Jairzinho]

1 hour ago, Arniepie said:

I think at this any stage, any murmur of support for Palestine will see him getting both barrels from the Tories and their lackeys in the media.

Not to mention those red wall morons. 

 

 

Then I hope he's done his sums because young people, public sector workers, muslims, and anyone else to the left of Peter Mandelson who can't stomach this constant stream of wet shit from him on a range of topics, won't be voting for him.

[Arniepie]

25 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

 

Then I hope he's done his sums because young people, public sector workers, muslims, and anyone else to the left of Peter Mandelson who can't stomach this constant stream of wet shit from him on a range of topics, won't be voting for him.

I actually thought he spoke quite well on Monday. He stressed the importance of not breaking international law (unlike sunak) and about protecting the poor sods caught in palestine.

Ill be voting for him because these cunts need volleying out but he is in danger on being on the wrong side of history.

I just think the tories are desperate to start throwing out the terrorist sympathiser argument and we saw how that went last time.

[Anubis]

2 hours ago, Gnasher said:

I think you need to treat that poll with caution as it was open to anyone registering with an email address.

[Gnasher]

 

 

 

 

First paragraph of her book looks a little bit er..embarrassing. Especially the last sentence. Oh dear.

 

 

 

Reeves said it was all a mistake. When asked if she was going to amend the book she said 'no, you turn if you want to, this lady's not for turning, before saying she had a dream last night, a dream that all gods children will grow up to be judged not by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character.

[Jairzinho]

14 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

 

Reeves said it was all a mistake. When asked if she was going to amend the book she said 'no, you turn if you want to, this lady's not for turning, before saying she had a dream last night, a dream that all gods children will grow up to be judged not by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character wallet.

 

[Section_31]

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

 

[Gnasher]

1 minute ago, Section_31 said:

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

 

 

Cunt should be reported for that.

[Arniepie]

3 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

 

isnt that cunt in the mud yet?

[Creator Supreme]

3 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

 

I really hope he catches a severe strain of gonorrhoea the fucking big waste of skin.

 

As HMHB said

"In a Suffolk ditch.....Kelvin Mackenzie.

In a second hand hessian sack"!

[Section_31]

This is the narrative they'll spin though, that's why I keep saying it's not as simple as people are making out. It's all to lose for Labour at the moment, if we get another five years' of these cunts I'm going to eat a shotgun. 

[Gnasher]

4 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

This is the narrative they'll spin though, that's why I keep saying it's not as simple as people are making out. It's all to lose for Labour at the moment, if we get another five years' of these cunts I'm going to eat a shotgun. 

 

Yeah I understand. It's always a difficult balancing act where these cunts will jump down your throat. 

[Jairzinho]

First act of his government should be to shove that vile cunt through a wood chipper though. 

 

On telly. 

[Gnasher]

Burham joins Khan in breaking Labour' ranks. A little bit of me wonders if its political payback for Starmer blaming Uxbridge on Khan's Ulez scheme and forcing out Jamie Driscoll up the North East. 

 

 

 

 

[Gnasher]

 

 

 

[Jairzinho]

Starmer might have to stand for something here even if computer says no. It's not going to look great if numbers of councillors are sufficiently appalled by his shithousery to resign.

 

No-one in the red wall gives a fuck really. I don't think him wanting an end to Israel's child murder campaign is actually going to be some big vote loser.

[Arniepie]

1 hour ago, Jairzinho said:

Starmer might have to stand for something here even if computer says no. It's not going to look great if numbers of councillors are sufficiently appalled by his shithousery to resign.

 

No-one in the red wall gives a fuck really. I don't think him wanting an end to Israel's child murder campaign is actually going to be some big vote loser.

I think the Tories and the media will fully weaponise that anti asylum/immigrant feeling that's out there but yeah he has to take a stand somewhere. 

[Dicko]

Starmer is just reaping what he's sowed.

Rule the party like an authoritarian shithouse, then don't be surprised when the alienated fuck you off.

[Bruce Spanner]

[gkmacca]

'Don't vote for that paint drying. This paint is drying. Vote for this paint!' About 1.25 years, ish, of formal British socialism, of a particularly vapid, limp and incoherent nature, and, after all those years, they end up with merely 'well at least they're not the other lot'. 

 

[Strontium]

I think most people are not hugely ideological and just want someone competent running things. Starmer has given no indication that he'll be anything except more competent than the clown show in charge at the moment.

[Strontium]

 

[Dicko]

7 hours ago, Strontium said:

I think most people are not hugely ideological and just want someone competent running things. Starmer has given no indication that he'll be anything except more competent than the clown show in charge at the moment.

It's not a high bar is it?

If you replaced the cabinet with all 20 Premier League managers, you'd still get an improvement.

Apart from Hodgson obviously.