Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Transgender stuff - what's going on?


Gym Beglin
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 05/06/2022 at 17:05, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Nope.

 

You're a fundamentalist about Q.1, so it's not worth trying to engage with you on anything to do with the subject of trans rights. I've long since learned that; it's why I don't come into this thread very often. But the last couple of times I've been here, it's clear that you're becoming increasingly unhinged - even to the point of throwing snide allegations of child sexual abuse at some celebrity drag queen and pretending that paedos are putting frocks on to avoid prison.

Research. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/06/2022 at 14:41, Rico1304 said:

Hes a scientist specialising in ethics is sports.  After the Forstater case his views are protected so if he does get fired the OU is in trouble.  He knows what he’s doing.  I think he was also part of the panel that led to world rugby banning TW from womens rugby. They concluded you could have fairness and safety or inclusion. Not all three. And yet still…

Research 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/06/2022 at 20:22, Section_31 said:

I'm always struck by agression often shown from the pro transgender movement. 

 

Most of the 'anti trans' voices aren't killing people, getting them excluded from pubs or setting fire to houses it would seem, they're retweeting things by Margaret Atwood, doing a stand up routine or saying they'd like to be able to take a shit in a train station in peace.

 

The reaction to it then seems to go straight to Defcon 1 with the spamming of publishing houses/universities, demands for job losses, demands for sponsorship cancellations, claims that their tweets are 'literally' killing people, that people are threatening suicide and so forth. If said target is punished in some way, it's then subject to a second phase of celebratory flaming.

 

The LGB alliance are currently getting an earful because they've been given a lottery grant for a helpline. The lottery is of course being flamed too. Owen Jones of course leading the charge.

 

Always seems a bit, I dunno, disproportionate. Almost like a sizeable chunk of these people are absolutely mental.

 

The idea that it's some kind of modern social justice movement is bonkers IMO and cheapens the fights which have gone before. Black people were and are being killed for being black, gay people were given electric shock therapy. Meanwhile, a hairy biker is fighting the good fight to be allowed to have a piss next to a little girl.

What changed?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Babb'sBurstNad said:

Oi, stop conversing and out this rape-monger!

Ha - I’m on it.  It’s as I described.

 

1)  Men shouldn’t be in prisons.  

2) Stats on American women being raped by wardens.  

3) Inference they are already being raped. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/01/2023 at 18:18, Rico1304 said:

Giving a child a drug that will impact on brain development, hugely impact their bone density and put them on a pathway to a life of medication is never the correct decision.  There is no evidence that PBs have any positive outcomes and the one flawed study cited to offer a

positive spin has been discredited and the protocol withdrawn.  

This kid knew his stuff 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the take away for all the people who ignored science and common sense on this issue is that you did it because you thought you were ‘right’.   You were willing to see children be castrated on that basis.  
 

Moment of reflection for all those nonce enablers. You know who you are…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I think the take away for all the people who ignored science and common sense on this issue is that you did it because you thought you were ‘right’.   You were willing to see children be castrated on that basis.  
 

Moment of reflection for all those nonce enablers. You know who you are…

Gonna take a wild swing and suggest that this report came down on your side of the argument?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Captain Howdy said:

Gonna take a wild swing and suggest that this report came down on your side of the argument?

No more than a report into the fact that say the Covid vaccine was effective.  The evidence has been evaluated and dissected. The quality of evidence on both sides has been exposed and the deliberate obstruction of one side has been clear to see. 
 

Now if we were in the Covid thread how would you react to the evidence being overwhelming?  Unless your view was ideological you’d admit you were wrong wouldn’t you? 
 

This review was led by a senior paediatrician, the results backed by the BMJ. 
 

Now, remember the ones who advocated for kids being sterilised and men in womens prisons.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve told you.  He said women were already getting raped (in American) prisons. He even posted the stats. 
 

Hope this helps 
 

1) People are stealing from this shop

2) Some of the people stealing are employees but they’ve not necessarily been caught 

3) We are going to ask a load of convicted shoplifters to to visit our shop but the main focus should be the employees 

4) Perhaps the correct answer is to fuck off the light fingered employees and not invite the shoplifters in. 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I’ve told you.  He said women were already getting raped (in American) prisons. He even posted the stats. 
 

Hope this helps 
 

1) People are stealing from this shop

2) Some of the people stealing are employees but they’ve not necessarily been caught 

3) We are going to ask a load of convicted shoplifters to to visit our shop but the main focus should be the employees 

4) Perhaps the correct answer is to fuck off the light fingered employees and not invite the shoplifters in. 

 

Who said it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...