Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, arthur friedenreich said:

it's the constant jibe though man, it's reaching fucking Rashid levels, plus whether you agree or not, it's on people to choose and according to Dave's demands. we're not one the buses and you're not fucking Blakey.

It’s a constant jibe because they consistently don’t pay. It’s not me who benefits, it’s Dave and therefore all of us. Surely that’s socialism. These people can pay -

but chose not to.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, arthur friedenreich said:

that is his choice, every poster contributes via their time spent on here- not cloggy the belgian cunt, which helps keep the site alive.

I block all of the adverts via the browsers I use, this hurts Dave's bottom line probably 0.001%, i am in effect doing him out of some wedge, but I  don't expect to be hounded for doing it.

We all know RICO PAYS HIS SUBS OTHERS DO NOT, put it in yer ficking sig if you want, but for fucks sakes don't keep going round in circles.

Oh do fuck off. If my protestations about free loading cunts annoy you just block me. 

 

If the members didn’t pay the site would die. Don’t deny anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Oh do fuck off. If my protestations about free loading cunts annoy you just block me. 

 

If the members didn’t pay the site would die. Don’t deny anything else. 

 Nah, it’s bollocks man and annoying as hell. Dave has set it up that you pay for his reports and diary (and well worth it they are too).

There are no “subs” for using the forum.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jose Jones said:

 Nah, it’s bollocks man and annoying as hell. Dave has set it up that you pay for his reports and diary (and well worth it they are too).

There are no “subs” for using the forum.

Fine - you can ignore me and never hear it again 

 

without the members the site ends. 

 

You pay, why shouldn’t others?  I fail

to see the difficulty with thsi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Fine - you can ignore me and never hear it again 

 

without the members the site ends. 

 

You pay, why shouldn’t others?  I fail

to see the difficulty with thsi. 

No, the site would die if everyone was forced to become members.

I choose to pay for Dave’s writing, others don’t, who cares? Dave doesn’t.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, cloggypop said:

Mad how Rico still doesn't get capitalist choice.

 

Dave should introduce a paid option where ignored blerts don't show up on quotes. 

You aren’t paying - you are very unlikely to stump up for Dave’s other delights. 

 

Look, I’d be embarrassed. You aren’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

You aren’t paying - you are very unlikely to stump up for Dave’s other delights. 

 

Look, I’d be embarrassed. You aren’t. 

Listen if their is a secret dick pick society within this forum and I'm being left out then I want to know. Mines not bad at all. I think Lizzie Birdsworth and Stringvest have seen it actually. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fucking hell. Two pages of Rico dominating shit again. It’s really getting old. I agree with his general principle that people who use the site loads and clearly have the money to do so should help keep the site running, but the last thing we need is for the barrage of constant shit. Firstly, it’s annoying to keep reading it; and secondly, Dave has come out and said he doesn’t want that to keep happening. 

 

Sort yourself out Rico. Although I used to disagree with you on stuff, you’d always engage and be serious about subjects, but you’re just plain cunty all the time now. On every subject. Your posts are now reduced to 1) Anti-religious/Muslim/Corbyn/Trans links 2) ‘pay your subs’ 3) Callers my those who don’t agree with you ‘smart kids’ and ‘woke’. 

 

Just reset yourself and your attitude and start posting in a more a more positive way. At least approach your conversations with people in a different way. You’re not an idiot, but just have a look through your recent posting history and imagine it was somebody else. 

 

Those who consider yourselves mates of Rico, you need to have a friendly word via PM. That’s what mates do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bjornebye said:

Listen if their is a secret dick pick society within this forum and I'm being left out then I want to know. Mines not bad at all. I think Lizzie Birdsworth and Stringvest have seen it actually. 

#metoo

 

(although only a pic) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wondering whether it might be worth Corbyn asking this Human rights shower to make sure they do an investigation, and promise to implement any extra recommendations made as surely even the LFI arseholes would struggle to suggest they are not independent and I would be amazed if any massively damaging criticisms would be made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair play to Rico for reminding us that there are long term freeloaders in our midst.

 

The problem is, because they have been called out for the leeches that they are, by their arch enemy, their egos cant allow them be seen to give in by paying. More palatable to suck it up or ignore it than do the decent thing. 

 

Anyway, thats enough of that, what about Corbyns position on Trident?

 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Wondering whether it might be worth Corbyn asking this Human rights shower to make sure they do an investigation, and promise to implement any extra recommendations made as surely even the LFI arseholes would struggle to suggest they are not independent and I would be amazed if any massively damaging criticisms would be made.

Thought the same myself. Get them to sign off on the Labour Party being free of anti-semitism, or at least that the party has the right processes in place. Then everyone can move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...